Breeding for yield in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

被引:88
|
作者
Kelly, JD [1 ]
Judith, MK [1 ]
Schneider, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
breeding pyramid; combining ability; gene pools; ideotype; partitioning; wild species;
D O I
10.1023/A:1018392901978
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Strategies employed by dry bean breeders to improve yield include early generation testing, ideotype breeding, selection for physiological efficiency, and selection based on genotypic performance and combining ability across gene pools of Phaseolus vulgaris. Ideotype breeding has been successfully deployed to improve yield in navy, pinto and great northern seed types. The ideotype method is based on an ideal plant architecture to which breeders target their selection. Breeding for physiological efficiency is important in combining increased biomass, high growth rates and efficient partitioning. Genotypic performance and combining ability are also critical for yield improvement, since crosses between gene pools can exhibit negative combining ability and problems with lethality, whereas interracial crosses within the same gene pool exhibit the greatest potential. Breeders must work within specific constraints for growth habit, maturity, seed quality and disease resistance. A three-tiered pyramidal breeding strategy is proposed to facilitate yield improvement in dry bean. Breeding of elite, agronomically acceptable germplasm within the same market class is restricted to the apex of the pyramid. The intermediate level has fewer constraints and greater access to diverse germplasm. Interracial crosses within the same gene pool are utilized to exploit genetic differences within adapted material. Extracting genetic diversity from unadapted sources, including wild germplasm and other Phaseolus species, is conducted at the base of the pyramid. The objective of this breeding strategy is the movement of improved germplasm towards the apex, using different breeding procedures to optimize improvement at each tier of the breeding pyramid.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 356
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breeding for yield in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    James D. Kelly
    Judith M. Kolkman
    Kristin Schneider
    Euphytica, 1998, 102 : 343 - 356
  • [2] Correlations in Leaf Chlorophyll and Yield Related Traits of Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Gueler, Semiha
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2009, 21 (03) : 1792 - 1796
  • [3] Biotechnology approaches in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) breeding
    Saglam, Sevil
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 231 : S17 - S17
  • [4] Breeding for bean fly resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): a review
    Nkhata, Wilson
    Shimelis, Hussein
    Melis, Rob
    Chirwa, Rowland
    Mzengeza, Tenyson
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 69 (03): : 275 - 285
  • [5] Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Mekbib, F
    EUPHYTICA, 2003, 130 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [6] The effect of deficit irrigation on the grain yield of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in semiarid regions
    Ucar, Y.
    Kadayifci, A.
    Yilmaz, H. I.
    Tuylu, G. I.
    Yardimci, N.
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2009, 7 (02) : 474 - 485
  • [7] Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Frew Mekbib
    Euphytica, 2003, 130 : 147 - 153
  • [8] Yield Stability of Heirloom Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars in Midwest Organic Production
    Swegarden, Hannah R.
    Sheaffer, Craig C.
    Michaels, Thomas E.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2016, 51 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [9] Breeding for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) rust resistance in Brazil
    Souza, Thiago Livio P. O.
    Faleiro, Fabio G.
    Dessaune, Suelen N.
    de Paula-Junior, Trazilbo J.
    Moreira, Maurilio A.
    de Barros, Everaldo G.
    TROPICAL PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2013, 38 (05): : 361 - 374
  • [10] Effect of imazamox plus bentazon on dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Hekmat, Sharareh
    Soltani, Nader
    Shropshire, Christy
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2008, 27 (12) : 1491 - 1494