The quality of life and cost utility of home nocturnal and conventional in-center hemodialysis

被引:136
|
作者
McFarlane, PA
Bayoumi, AM
Pierratos, A
Redelmeier, DA
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med,Inner City Hlth Res Unit, Home Dialysis Clin, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2, Canada
[2] Humber River Reg Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
economic analysis; hemodialysis; home; prospective studies; resource allocation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00157.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is an intensive form of hemodialysis, where patients perform their treatments at home for about 7 hours approximately 6 nights a week. Compared with in-center conventional hemodialysis, home nocturnal hemodialysis has been shown to improve physiologic parameters and reduce health care costs; however, the effects on quality of life and cost utility are less clear. We hypothesized that individuals performing home nocturnal hemodialysis would have a higher quality of life and superior cost utility than in-center hemodialysis patients. Methods. Home nocturnal hemodialysis patients and a demographically similar group of in-center hemodialysis patients from a hospital without a home hemodialysis program underwent computer-assisted interviews to assess their utility score for current health by the standard gamble method. Results. Nineteen in-center hemodialysis and 24 home nocturnal hemodialysis patients were interviewed. Mean annual costs for home nocturnal hemodialysis were about $10,000 lower for home nocturnal hemodialysis ($55,139 +/-$7651 for home nocturnal hemodialysis vs. $66,367 +/-$17,502 for in-center hemodialysis, P = 0.03). Home nocturnal hemodialysis was associated with a higher utility score than in-center hemodialysis (0.77 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.53 +/- 0.35, P = 0.03). The cost utility for home nocturnal hemodialysis was $71,443/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), while for in-center hemodialysis it was $125,845/QALY. Home nocturnal hemodialysis was the dominant strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$45,932. The 95% CI for the ICER, and 2500 bootstrap iterations of the ICER all fell below the cost-effectiveness ceiling of $50,000. The net monetary benefit of home nocturnal hemodialysis ranged from $11,227 to $35,669. Conclusion. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is associated with a higher quality of life and a superior cost utility when compared to in-center hemodialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1011
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Association between conversion to in-center nocturnal hemodialysis and right ventricular remodeling
    Karur, Gauri R.
    Wald, Ron
    Goldstein, Marc B.
    Wald, Rachel
    Jimenez-Juan, Laura
    Kiaii, Mercedeh
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    Kirpalani, Anish
    Bello, Olugbenga
    Barthur, Ashita
    Ng, Ming-Yen
    Deva, Djeven P.
    Yan, Andrew T.
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 33 (06) : 1010 - 1016
  • [32] Nocturnal hemodialysis does not improve overall measures of quality of life compared to conventional hemodialysis
    Manns, Braden J.
    Walsh, Michael W.
    Culleton, Bruce F.
    Hemmelgam, Brenda
    Tonelli, Marcello
    Schorr, Melissa
    Klarenbach, Scott
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 75 (05) : 542 - 549
  • [33] In-center Nocturnal Hemodialysis: Another Option in the Management of Chronic Kidney Disease
    Bugeja, Ann
    Dacouris, Niki
    Thomas, Alison
    Marticorena, Rosa
    McFarlane, Philip
    Donnelly, Sandra
    Goldstein, Marc
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 4 (04): : 778 - 783
  • [34] Outcomes Associated with In-Center Nocturnal Hemodialysis from a Large Multicenter Program
    Lacson, Eduardo, Jr.
    Wang, Weiling
    Ofsthun, Norma
    Lazarus, J. Michael
    Hakim, Raymond M.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 5 (02): : 220 - 226
  • [35] In-center thrice-weekly nocturnal hemodialysis reduces blood pressure and pulse pressure more effectively than conventional hemodialysis.
    Campbell, R
    Gambara, V
    Dimitrov, BD
    Ruggenenti, P
    Mingardi, G
    Remuzzi, G
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 232A - 232A
  • [36] Serum Phosphorus Levels Improve After Transition to In-Center Nocturnal Hemodialysis
    Lynn, Robert I.
    Francisco, Linda
    Simon, Shane
    Volz, Abbe
    Spach, Karen
    Levine, Ronald
    Provenzano, Robert
    BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2010, 30 (03) : 234 - 234
  • [37] The carbon footprints of home and in-center maintenance hemodialysis in the United Kingdom
    Connor, Andrew
    Lillywhite, Robert
    Cooke, Matthew W.
    HEMODIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 15 (01) : 39 - 51
  • [38] Long-Term In-Center Nocturnal Hemodialysis Improves Renal Anemia and Malnutrition and Life Quality of Older Patients with Chronic Renal Failure
    Gong, Yu
    Xie, Liangyu
    Yu, Shengqiang
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2022, 17 : 915 - 923
  • [39] The In-Center Hemodialysis Unit, Yet Another Obstacle to Home Dialysis
    Lynch, Matthew R.
    Shah, Ankur D.
    KIDNEY360, 2021, 2 (12): : 1871 - 1872
  • [40] PATIENT INVOLVEMENT WITH THE TASKS OF IN-CENTER HEMODIALYSIS AND HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE DOPPS
    Wilkie, Martin
    Karaboyas, Angelo
    Rayner, Hugh
    Fluck, Richard
    Morgenstern, Hal
    Li, Yun
    Kerr, Peter
    Mendelssohn, David
    Wikstroem, Bjoern
    Tentori, Francesca
    Pisoni, Ronald
    Robinson, Bruce
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 28 : 473 - 474