The quality of life and cost utility of home nocturnal and conventional in-center hemodialysis

被引:136
作者
McFarlane, PA
Bayoumi, AM
Pierratos, A
Redelmeier, DA
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med,Inner City Hlth Res Unit, Home Dialysis Clin, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2, Canada
[2] Humber River Reg Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
economic analysis; hemodialysis; home; prospective studies; resource allocation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00157.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is an intensive form of hemodialysis, where patients perform their treatments at home for about 7 hours approximately 6 nights a week. Compared with in-center conventional hemodialysis, home nocturnal hemodialysis has been shown to improve physiologic parameters and reduce health care costs; however, the effects on quality of life and cost utility are less clear. We hypothesized that individuals performing home nocturnal hemodialysis would have a higher quality of life and superior cost utility than in-center hemodialysis patients. Methods. Home nocturnal hemodialysis patients and a demographically similar group of in-center hemodialysis patients from a hospital without a home hemodialysis program underwent computer-assisted interviews to assess their utility score for current health by the standard gamble method. Results. Nineteen in-center hemodialysis and 24 home nocturnal hemodialysis patients were interviewed. Mean annual costs for home nocturnal hemodialysis were about $10,000 lower for home nocturnal hemodialysis ($55,139 +/-$7651 for home nocturnal hemodialysis vs. $66,367 +/-$17,502 for in-center hemodialysis, P = 0.03). Home nocturnal hemodialysis was associated with a higher utility score than in-center hemodialysis (0.77 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.53 +/- 0.35, P = 0.03). The cost utility for home nocturnal hemodialysis was $71,443/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), while for in-center hemodialysis it was $125,845/QALY. Home nocturnal hemodialysis was the dominant strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$45,932. The 95% CI for the ICER, and 2500 bootstrap iterations of the ICER all fell below the cost-effectiveness ceiling of $50,000. The net monetary benefit of home nocturnal hemodialysis ranged from $11,227 to $35,669. Conclusion. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is associated with a higher quality of life and a superior cost utility when compared to in-center hemodialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1011
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[41]  
Prichard SS, 1997, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V12, P22
[42]  
RodriguezCarmona A, 1996, ADV PERIT D, V12, P93
[43]   THE QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
RUSSELL, JD ;
BEECROFT, ML ;
LUDWIN, D ;
CHURCHILL, DN .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1992, 54 (04) :656-660
[44]  
SEEDAT YK, 1987, S AFR MED J, V71, P500
[45]  
Stinnett AA, 1998, MED DECIS MAKING, V18, pS68, DOI 10.1177/0272989X98018002S09
[46]  
Uldall R, 1996, Adv Ren Replace Ther, V3, P133
[47]   COSTS, EFFECTS AND C/E-RATIOS ALONGSIDE A CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
VANHOUT, BA ;
AL, MJ ;
GORDON, GS ;
RUTEN, FFH .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1994, 3 (05) :309-319
[48]  
Weinstein M C, 1981, Med Decis Making, V1, P309, DOI 10.1177/0272989X8100100403
[49]   FOUNDATIONS OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS FOR HEALTH AND MEDICAL PRACTICES [J].
WEINSTEIN, MC ;
STASON, WB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1977, 296 (13) :716-721