The quality of life and cost utility of home nocturnal and conventional in-center hemodialysis

被引:136
作者
McFarlane, PA
Bayoumi, AM
Pierratos, A
Redelmeier, DA
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med,Inner City Hlth Res Unit, Home Dialysis Clin, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2, Canada
[2] Humber River Reg Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
economic analysis; hemodialysis; home; prospective studies; resource allocation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00157.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is an intensive form of hemodialysis, where patients perform their treatments at home for about 7 hours approximately 6 nights a week. Compared with in-center conventional hemodialysis, home nocturnal hemodialysis has been shown to improve physiologic parameters and reduce health care costs; however, the effects on quality of life and cost utility are less clear. We hypothesized that individuals performing home nocturnal hemodialysis would have a higher quality of life and superior cost utility than in-center hemodialysis patients. Methods. Home nocturnal hemodialysis patients and a demographically similar group of in-center hemodialysis patients from a hospital without a home hemodialysis program underwent computer-assisted interviews to assess their utility score for current health by the standard gamble method. Results. Nineteen in-center hemodialysis and 24 home nocturnal hemodialysis patients were interviewed. Mean annual costs for home nocturnal hemodialysis were about $10,000 lower for home nocturnal hemodialysis ($55,139 +/-$7651 for home nocturnal hemodialysis vs. $66,367 +/-$17,502 for in-center hemodialysis, P = 0.03). Home nocturnal hemodialysis was associated with a higher utility score than in-center hemodialysis (0.77 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.53 +/- 0.35, P = 0.03). The cost utility for home nocturnal hemodialysis was $71,443/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), while for in-center hemodialysis it was $125,845/QALY. Home nocturnal hemodialysis was the dominant strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$45,932. The 95% CI for the ICER, and 2500 bootstrap iterations of the ICER all fell below the cost-effectiveness ceiling of $50,000. The net monetary benefit of home nocturnal hemodialysis ranged from $11,227 to $35,669. Conclusion. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is associated with a higher quality of life and a superior cost utility when compared to in-center hemodialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1011
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   Improvement in ejection fraction by nocturnal haemodialysis in end-stage renal failure patients with coexisting heart failure [J].
Chan, C ;
Floras, JS ;
Miller, JA ;
Pierratos, A .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 17 (08) :1518-1521
[12]   Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after conversion to nocturnal hemodialysis [J].
Chan, CT ;
Floras, JS ;
Miller, JA ;
Richardson, RMA ;
Pierratos, A .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 61 (06) :2235-2239
[13]  
Chaudhary MA, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P1447
[14]   An economic evaluation of hospital-based hemodialysis and home-based peritoneal dialysis for pediatric patients [J].
Coyte, PC ;
Young, LG ;
Tipper, BL ;
Mitchell, VM ;
Stoffman, PR ;
Willumsen, J ;
Geary, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1996, 27 (04) :557-565
[15]   Does transplantation produce quality of life benefits? A quantitative analysis of the literature [J].
Dew, MA ;
Switzer, GE ;
Goycoolea, JM ;
Allen, AS ;
DiMartini, A ;
Kormos, RL ;
Griffith, BP .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (09) :1261-1273
[16]   Valuing health states: A comparison of methods [J].
Dolan, P ;
Gudex, C ;
Kind, P ;
Williams, A .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1996, 15 (02) :209-231
[17]  
Effron B, 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP
[18]  
EVANS RW, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P825
[19]  
FERGUSON BM, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P240
[20]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE FOR PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL-FAILURE [J].
FOX, E ;
PEACE, K ;
NEALE, TJ ;
MORRISON, RBI ;
HATFIELD, PJ ;
MELLSOP, G .
RENAL FAILURE, 1991, 13 (01) :31-35