The quality of life and cost utility of home nocturnal and conventional in-center hemodialysis

被引:136
作者
McFarlane, PA
Bayoumi, AM
Pierratos, A
Redelmeier, DA
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med,Inner City Hlth Res Unit, Home Dialysis Clin, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2, Canada
[2] Humber River Reg Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
economic analysis; hemodialysis; home; prospective studies; resource allocation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00157.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is an intensive form of hemodialysis, where patients perform their treatments at home for about 7 hours approximately 6 nights a week. Compared with in-center conventional hemodialysis, home nocturnal hemodialysis has been shown to improve physiologic parameters and reduce health care costs; however, the effects on quality of life and cost utility are less clear. We hypothesized that individuals performing home nocturnal hemodialysis would have a higher quality of life and superior cost utility than in-center hemodialysis patients. Methods. Home nocturnal hemodialysis patients and a demographically similar group of in-center hemodialysis patients from a hospital without a home hemodialysis program underwent computer-assisted interviews to assess their utility score for current health by the standard gamble method. Results. Nineteen in-center hemodialysis and 24 home nocturnal hemodialysis patients were interviewed. Mean annual costs for home nocturnal hemodialysis were about $10,000 lower for home nocturnal hemodialysis ($55,139 +/-$7651 for home nocturnal hemodialysis vs. $66,367 +/-$17,502 for in-center hemodialysis, P = 0.03). Home nocturnal hemodialysis was associated with a higher utility score than in-center hemodialysis (0.77 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.53 +/- 0.35, P = 0.03). The cost utility for home nocturnal hemodialysis was $71,443/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), while for in-center hemodialysis it was $125,845/QALY. Home nocturnal hemodialysis was the dominant strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$45,932. The 95% CI for the ICER, and 2500 bootstrap iterations of the ICER all fell below the cost-effectiveness ceiling of $50,000. The net monetary benefit of home nocturnal hemodialysis ranged from $11,227 to $35,669. Conclusion. Home nocturnal hemodialysis is associated with a higher quality of life and a superior cost utility when compared to in-center hemodialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1011
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   An off-the-shelf help list: A comprehensive catalog of preference scores from published cost-utility analyses [J].
Bell, CM ;
Chapman, RH ;
Stone, PW ;
Sandberg, EA ;
Neumann, PJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2001, 21 (04) :288-294
[2]  
Blagg C R, 1996, Adv Ren Replace Ther, V3, P99
[3]   A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities [J].
Bleichrodt, H .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 11 (05) :447-456
[4]   Economics notes - Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation [J].
Briggs, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7202) :120-120
[5]  
Briggs A, 1998, HEALTH ECON, V7, P723, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199812)7:8<723::AID-HEC392>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-F
[7]   Thinking outside the box: Recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies [J].
Briggs, AH ;
O'Brien, BJ ;
Blackhouse, G .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 23 :377-401
[8]  
Bruns FJ, 1998, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V9, P884
[9]   SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC COSTS OF END-STAGE RENAL-DISEASE - PATIENTS PERSPECTIVE [J].
CAMPBELL, JD ;
CAMPBELL, AR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (08) :386-392
[10]  
*CAN ORG REPL REG, 1996, 2001 ANN REP