Combining GIS Applications and Method of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (AHP) for Landfill Siting in Al-Hashimiyah Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq

被引:41
|
作者
Chabuk, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Al-Ansari, Nadhir [1 ]
Hussain, Hussain Musa [3 ]
Knutsson, Sven [1 ]
Pusch, Roland [1 ]
Laue, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Univ Babylon, Coll Engn, Dept Environm Engn, Babylon 51001, Iraq
[3] Univ Kufa, Fac Sci, Dept Geol, Kufa 32003, Iraq
关键词
AHP method; GIS software; landfill site; solid waste; SITE SELECTION; SUITABILITY; CITIES; TURKEY; ISLAND; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su9111932
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Landfill siting is a complex process. It is one of the major problems in waste management, where many factors should be taken into consideration when selecting a suitable site for landfill in any given area. At the present time, there are many random waste disposal sites distributed throughout Al-Hashimiyah Qadhaa in Iraq. In this study, the Geographic Information System (GIS) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) were used to select the best sites for landfill. The process of selecting sites for landfill in Al-Hashimiyah Qadhaa comprised two steps. First, fifteen different criteria were mapped and incorporated into overlay analyses within GIS software to produce the final suitability index map for the site. The second step comprises the exclusion of unsuitable areas from the final map to simplify identification of the candidate sites for landfill in the study area. The weightings of criteria were identified using AHP, and the weightings of the sub-criteria of each criterion were determined based on multiple factors. In order to accommodate solid waste from 2020 until 2030, two suitable candidate landfill sites were determined which fulfill the required area of 1.013 km(2) with areas of 1.374 km(2) and 1.288 km(2) respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Extended EDAS Method for Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making: An Application to Supplier Selection
    Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Turskis, Zenonas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2016, 11 (03) : 358 - 371
  • [42] The ELECTRE I Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets
    Chen, Na
    Xu, Zeshui
    Xia, Meimei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (03) : 621 - 657
  • [43] A new fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on proximity index value
    Mufazzal, Sameera
    Khan, Noor Zaman
    Muzakkir, S. M.
    Siddiquee, Arshad Noor
    Khan, Zahid
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2022, 39 (01) : 42 - 58
  • [44] Land Suitability Evaluation by Integrating Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), Geographic Information System (GIS) Method, and Augmented Reality-GIS
    Maulana, Hanhan
    Kanai, Hideaki
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES, KES-IDT 2021, 2021, 238 : 309 - 320
  • [45] Investigation of the effects of coal properties, environmental conditions, and costs on coal drying method selection using multi-criteria decision-making method (AHP)
    Demir, Ismail
    Adiguzel, Deniz
    Tuylu, Serkan
    Ozkan, Safak Gokhan
    PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROBLEMS OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2024, 60 (05):
  • [46] A blockchain platform selection method with heterogeneous multi-criteria Decision-Making based on hybrid distance measures and an AHP-EWM weight method
    Liu, Jun
    Zhang, Qi
    Xie, Mingyue
    Lin, Mingwei
    Xu, Zeshui
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 256
  • [47] GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making for ranking potential sites for centralized rainwater harvesting
    Patil D.
    Gupta R.
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 24 (2) : 497 - 506
  • [48] Potential areas for nuclear power plants siting in Saudi Arabia: GIS-based multi-criteria decision making analysis
    Damoom, Mohammed M.
    Hashim, Suhairul
    Aljohani, Mohammed S.
    Saleh, Muneer Aziz
    Xoubi, Ned
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 110 : 110 - 120
  • [50] Evaluation of trustworthy artificial intelligent healthcare applications using multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Alsalem, M. A.
    Alamoodi, A. H.
    Albahri, O. S.
    Albahri, A. S.
    Martinez, Luis
    Yera, R.
    Duhaim, Ali M.
    Sharaf, Iman Mohamad
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 246