Effect of malolactic fermentation on the aroma properties of Tannat wine

被引:51
|
作者
Gámbaro, A
Boido, E
Zlotejablko, A
Medina, K
Lloret, A
Dellacassa, E
Carrau, F
机构
[1] Univ Republica, Fac Quim, Secc Enol, Montevideo, Uruguay
[2] Univ Republica, Fac Quim, Secc Evaluac Sensorial, Montevideo, Uruguay
[3] Univ Republica, Fac Quim, Catedra Farmacognosia & Prod Nat, Montevideo, Uruguay
关键词
Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tannat; sensory descriptive analysis; aroma properties; malolactic fermentation; Tannat wine;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-0238.2001.tb00190.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Descriptive sensory profiles of Uruguayan Tannat wines following malolactic fermentation (MLF) with Oenococcus oeni were compared with control wines where MLF was prevented. MLF led to a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in secondary descriptors such as 'berry fruit' and 'fresh vegetative', as well as a decrease in related tertiary descriptors such as 'blackcurrant', 'apricot', 'cut green grass' and 'green pepper'. The main differences in the chemical composition of Tannat wine aromas following MLF were (1) an increase of the lactates (mainly ethyl lactate) over the sensory threshold; (2) a significant decrease in ethyl esters and acetates, depending on the bacteria strain utilised (the most significant change was found in hexyl acetate), and (3) a small increase of 4-vinylguaiacol and 4-vinylphenol with one of the MLF strains (this change was below the threshold of human perception). We also observed an increase of compounds related to alpha -ketoglutarate metabolism, namely: ethyl 4-hidroxibutanoate and gamma -butyrolactone. Differences in chemical composition due to MLF are discussed in relation to variation in sensory profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Instrumental and sensory evaluation of malolactic fermentation in wine
    Keim, H
    de Revel, G
    Bertrand, A
    Flavour Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century, 2003, : 401 - 404
  • [32] Inhibition of malolactic fermentation by wine yeast during alcoholic fermentation
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE, 2004, 55 (03): : 299A - 299A
  • [33] EFFECTS OF CENTRIFUGATION ON MALOLACTIC FERMENTATION IN RED WINE
    Simonato, B.
    Tosi, E.
    Mainente, F.
    Azzolini, M.
    Spinelli, P.
    Cristofoletti, M.
    Zapparoli, G.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2008, 20 (04) : 525 - 531
  • [34] The Effect of Endozym β-split, a Commercial Enzyme Preparation Used for Aroma Release, on Tannat Wine Glycosides
    Cid, A. G.
    Goldner, M. C.
    Daz, M.
    Ellenrieder, G.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE, 2012, 33 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [35] Effects of inoculation timing and mixed fermentation with Pichia fermentans on Oenococcus oeni viability, fermentation duration and aroma production during wine malolactic fermentation
    Zhao, Hongyu
    Li, Yueqi
    Liu, Longxiang
    Zheng, Mengni
    Feng, Zhuojun
    Hu, Kai
    Tao, Yongsheng
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 159
  • [36] The influence of malolactic fermentation and Oenococcus oeni strain on glycosidic aroma precursors and related volatile compounds of red wine
    Ugliano, Maurizio
    Moio, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2006, 86 (14) : 2468 - 2476
  • [37] Non-Saccharomyces in Wine: Effect Upon Oenococcus oeni and Malolactic Fermentation
    Balmaseda, Aitor
    Bordons, Albert
    Reguant, Cristina
    Bautista-Gallego, Joaquin
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [38] Proteomic insight into the beneficial effect of mannoproteins on Oenococcus oeni in wine malolactic fermentation
    Torano, Paloma
    Balmaseda, Aitor
    Bordons, Albert
    Rozes, Nicolas
    Reguant, Cristina
    FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2025, 129
  • [39] Effect of the inoculation strategy of non-Saccharomyces yeasts on wine malolactic fermentation
    Martin-Garcia, Alba
    Balmaseda, Aitor
    Bordons, Albert
    Reguant, Cristina
    OENO ONE, 2020, 54 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [40] Effect of Malolactic Fermentation on Volatile Compounds of Merlot Low Alcohol Rose Wine
    Zhu X.
    Wang S.
    Zhao D.
    Han S.
    Yang X.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51 (11): : 338 - 348