Patient and healthcare provider reported barriers and enablers to virtual or remote-only follow-up models for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: protocol for a qualitative framework synthesis

被引:1
作者
Kelly, Shannon E. [1 ,2 ]
Clifford, Tammy J. [1 ]
Skidmore, Becky
Birnie, David [2 ]
Parkash, Ratika [3 ]
Wells, George A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Div Cardiol, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Remote monitoring; Virtual care; Model of care; Distance factors; Cardiovascular implantable electronic device; ICD; Pacemaker; CRT; Patient satisfaction; Healthcare provider; Barriers; STATEMENT; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-020-01410-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Virtual care models are used to follow-up patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), including pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy. There is increasing interest in the expansion of virtual, or even remote-only, CIED care models to alleviate resource and economic burden to both patients and specialty device clinics and to maintain or improve equity and access to high-quality cardiovascular care. This qualitative framework synthesis aims to identify barriers and enablers to virtual care models from both the perspective of the patient and device clinics. How setting, context, equity factors or other aspects influence these factors, or satisfaction with care, will also be investigated. Methods: We will perform a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Proquest Dissertations & Theses, other EBM Reviews, and trial registry databases. Screening will be completed by two independent review authors. Original research articles having a qualitative component (i.e., qualitative, mixed-, or multi-method) are eligible. Study populations of interest are (a) individuals with a CIED or (b) healthcare providers involved in any aspect of virtual or remote follow-up of patients with CIEDs. Eligibility will be restricted to studies published after January 1, 2000 in English or French. Data will be captured using standardized templates based on the domains and constructs of the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Warwick Patient Experiences Framework. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research will be applied to all included studies. The GRADE-CERQual approach will be applied to assess and summarize confidence in key findings. Reporting will follow the enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) statement. Detailed descriptive results will be presented, and summary of qualitative findings tables will be produced. Discussion: While a number of trials have captured the clinical effectiveness and safety of virtual follow-up for CIEDs, there has been less attention given to factors affecting use and implementation of remote care by patients and healthcare providers or satisfaction with care. Results from this qualitative framework synthesis will provide important lived experience data from both patients and healthcare providers which will be essential to incorporate in clinical guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Tramadol for osteoarthritis
    April, Karine Toupin
    Bisaillon, Jacinthe
    Welch, Vivian
    Maxwell, Lara J.
    Juni, Peter
    Rutjes, Anne W. S.
    Husni, M. Elaine
    Vincent, Jennifer
    El Hindi, Tania
    Wells, George A.
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (05):
  • [2] Reversing the pipeline? Implementing public health evidence-based guidance in english local government
    Atkins, Lou
    Kelly, Michael P.
    Littleford, Clare
    Leng, Gillian
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [3] Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt
    Atkins, Salla
    Lewin, Simon
    Smith, Helen
    Engel, Mark
    Fretheim, Atle
    Volmink, Jimmy
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [4] Booth A., 2018, BMJ Global Health, V4, pe001107, DOI [10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001107, DOI 10.1136/BMJGH-2018-001107]
  • [5] Taking account of context in systematic reviews and guidelines considering a complexity perspective
    Booth, Andrew
    Moore, Graham
    Flemming, Kate
    Garside, Ruth
    Rollins, Nigel
    Tuncalp, Ozge
    Noyes, Jane
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4
  • [6] Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 7: understanding the potential impacts of dissemination bias
    Booth, Andrew
    Lewin, Simon
    Glenton, Claire
    Munthe-Kaas, Heather
    Toews, Ingrid
    Noyes, Jane
    Rashidian, Arash
    Berg, Rigmor C.
    Nyakang'o, Brenda
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [7] Campbell D, 2019, CAN HEART RHYTH SOC
  • [8] Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research
    Cane, James
    O'Connor, Denise
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
  • [9] Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Cheung, Christopher C.
    Deyell, Marc W.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 34 (07) : 941 - 944
  • [10] Donaldson M, 2001, EXAMPLE THIN THICK D