Pre-implementation adaptation of primary care cancer prevention clinical decision support in a predominantly rural healthcare system

被引:15
作者
Harry, Melissa L. [1 ]
Saman, Daniel M. [1 ]
Truitt, Anjali R. [2 ]
Allen, Clayton I. [1 ]
Walton, Kayla M. [1 ]
O'Connor, Patrick J. [2 ]
Ekstrom, Heidi L. [2 ]
Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M. [2 ]
Bianco, Joseph A. [3 ]
Elliott, Thomas E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Essentia Inst Rural Hlth, Essentia Hlth, 6AV-2,502 East Second St, Duluth, MN 55805 USA
[2] HealthPartners Inst, 3311 E Old Shakopee Rd, Bloomington, MN 55425 USA
[3] Essentia Hlth Ely Clin, 300 W Conan St, Ely, MN 55731 USA
关键词
Cancer prevention and screening; Clinical decision support; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Pre-implementation adaptation; Primary care; Shared decision-making tools; MEDICAL ASSISTANTS; BREAST-CANCER; PROSTATE; BENEFITS; COLON;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-020-01136-8
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cancer is a leading cause of death in the United States. Primary care providers (PCPs) juggle patient cancer prevention and screening along with managing acute and chronic health problems. However, clinical decision support (CDS) may assist PCPs in addressing patients' cancer prevention and screening needs during short clinic visits. In this paper, we describe pre-implementation study design and cancer screening and prevention CDS changes made to maximize utilization and better fit a healthcare system's goals and culture. We employed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), useful for evaluating the implementation of CDS interventions in primary care settings, in understanding barriers and facilitators that led to those changes. Methods: In a three-arm, pragmatic, 36 clinic cluster-randomized control trial, we integrated cancer screening and prevention CDS and shared decision-making tools (SDMT) into an existing electronic medical record-linked cardiovascular risk management CDS system. The integrated CDS is currently being tested within a predominately rural upper Midwestern healthcare system. Prior to CDS implementation, we catalogued pre-implementation changes made from 2016 to 2018 based on: pre-implementation site engagement; key informant interviews with healthcare system rooming staff, providers, and leadership; and pilot testing. We identified influential barriers, facilitators, and changes made in response through qualitative content analysis of meeting minutes and supportive documents. We then coded pre-implementation changes made and associated barriers and facilitators using the CFIR. Results: Based on our findings from system-wide pre-implementation engagement, pilot testing, and key informant interviews, we made changes to accommodate the needs of the healthcare system based on barriers and facilitators that fell within the Intervention Characteristics, Inner Setting, and Outer Setting CFIR domains. Changes included replacing the expansion of medical assistant roles in one intervention arm with targeted SDMT, as well as altering cancer prevention CDS and study design elements. Conclusions: Pre-implementation changes to CDS may help meet healthcare systems' evolving needs and optimize the intervention by being responsive to real-world implementation barriers and facilitators. Frameworks like the CFIR are useful tools for identifying areas where pre-implementation barriers and facilitators may result in design changes, both to research studies and CDS systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An implementation framework and a feasibility evaluation of a clinical decision support system for diabetes management in secondary mental healthcare using CogStack
    Dipen Patel
    Yamiko J Msosa
    Tao Wang
    Omar G Mustafa
    Siobhan Gee
    Julie Williams
    Angus Roberts
    Richard JB Dobson
    Fiona Gaughran
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22
  • [32] Primary care physician experiences utilizing a family health history tool with electronic health record–integrated clinical decision support: an implementation process assessment
    Amy A. Lemke
    Jennifer Thompson
    Peter J. Hulick
    Annette W. Sereika
    Christian Johnson
    Lauren Oshman
    Henry M. Dunnenberger
    Journal of Community Genetics, 2020, 11 : 339 - 350
  • [33] Factors shaping the implementation and use of Clinical Cancer Decision Tools by GPs in primary care: a qualitative framework synthesis
    Bradley, Paula Theresa
    Hall, Nicola
    Maniatopoulos, Gregory
    Neal, Richard D.
    Paleri, Vinidh
    Wilkes, Scott
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [34] Ontology-based Modeling of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Clinical Decision Support System for Breast Cancer Follow-up Interventions at Primary Care Settings
    Abidi, Samina R.
    Abidi, Syed S. R.
    Hussain, Sajjad
    Shepherd, Mike
    MEDINFO 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH WORLD CONGRESS ON HEALTH (MEDICAL) INFORMATICS, PTS 1 AND 2: BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2007, 129 : 845 - +
  • [35] Adoption of a clinical decision support system to promote judicious use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care
    Litvin, Cara B.
    Ornstein, Steven M.
    Wessell, Andrea M.
    Nemeth, Lynne S.
    Nietert, Paul J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 81 (08) : 521 - 526
  • [36] Primary care physician experiences utilizing a family health history tool with electronic health record-integrated clinical decision support: an implementation process assessment
    Lemke, Amy A.
    Thompson, Jennifer
    Hulick, Peter J.
    Sereika, Annette W.
    Johnson, Christian
    Oshman, Lauren
    Dunnenberger, Henry M.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2020, 11 (03) : 339 - 350
  • [37] Pilot study of decision support tools on breast cancer chemoprevention for high-risk women and healthcare providers in the primary care setting
    Rita Kukafka
    Jiaqi Fang
    Alejandro Vanegas
    Thomas Silverman
    Katherine D. Crew
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18
  • [38] Pilot study of decision support tools on breast cancer chemoprevention for high-risk women and healthcare providers in the primary care setting
    Kukafka, Rita
    Fang, Jiaqi
    Vanegas, Alejandro
    Silverman, Thomas
    Crew, Katherine D.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 18
  • [39] Understanding User Acceptance of Clinical Decision Support Systems to Promote Increased Cancer Screening Rates in a Primary Care Practice
    Kelsey, Elizabeth A.
    Njeru, Jane W.
    Chaudhry, Rajeev
    Fischer, Karen M.
    Schroeder, Darrell R.
    Croghan, Ivana T.
    JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2020, 11
  • [40] An Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for the Assessment and Management of Suicidality in Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study
    Horrocks, Matthew
    Michail, Maria
    Aubeeluck, Aimee
    Wright, Nicola
    Morriss, Richard
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2018, 7 (12):