Role of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Screening and Diagnostic Breast Imaging

被引:12
作者
Destounis, Stamatia [1 ]
机构
[1] Elizabeth Wende Breast Care LLC, 170 Sawgrass Dr, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
关键词
CANCER-DETECTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; RECALL; TRIAL; DBT; CALCIFICATIONS; COMBINATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1053/j.sult.2017.08.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Digital breast tomosynthesis is quickly becoming the standard of care in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Since its introduction to the clinical landscape in 2011, radiologists specializing in breast disease diagnosis around the country have made the decision to adopt the technology for both screening and diagnostic applications; with adoption growing substantially in present day. Users of the technology have attested to the benefits the technology affords, both in screening and the diagnostic evaluation of patients, through peer reviewed publications and scientific presentations in recent years. This review article will describe the history of digital breast tomosynthesis and its implementation; from the early days of research, through Food and Drug Administration approval, to integration into the clinical workflow, in the setting of screening and diagnostic evaluation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Cancer facts & fi gures 2017-special section: rare cancers in adults
[2]   Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening [J].
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Tuttobene, Paolina ;
Fanto', Carmine ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Di Michele, Stefano ;
Peterlongo, Paolo ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 133 (01) :267-271
[3]   Can Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Replace Conventional Diagnostic Mammography Views for Screening Recalls Without Calcifications? A Comparison Study in a Simulated Clinical Setting [J].
Brandt, Kathleen R. ;
Craig, Daniel A. ;
Hoskins, Tanya L. ;
Henrichsen, Tara L. ;
Bendel, Emily C. ;
Brandt, Stephanie R. ;
Mandrekar, Jay .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (02) :291-298
[4]   False-negative breast screening assessment. What lessons can we learn? [J].
Burrell, HC ;
Evans, AJ ;
Wilson, ARM ;
Pinder, SE .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 56 (05) :385-388
[5]  
Butler R, 2012, RAD SOC N AM 2012 SC
[6]   Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study [J].
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Caumo, Francesca ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Brunelli, Silvia ;
Tuttobene, Paola ;
Bricolo, Paola ;
Fanto, Carmine ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Montemezzi, Stefania ;
Macaskill, Petra .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07) :583-589
[7]   Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium [J].
Conant, Emily F. ;
Beaber, Elisabeth F. ;
Sprague, Brian L. ;
Herschorn, Sally D. ;
Weaver, Donald L. ;
Onega, Tracy ;
Tosteson, Anna N. A. ;
McCarthy, Anne Marie ;
Poplack, Steven P. ;
Haas, Jennifer S. ;
Armstrong, Katrina ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Barlow, William E. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 156 (01) :109-116
[8]  
Dang P, 2013, COMP LESION DETECTIO
[9]   Addition of Tomosynthesis to Conventional Digital Mammography: Effect on Image Interpretation Time of Screening Examinations [J].
Dang, Pragya A. ;
Freer, Phoebe E. ;
Humphrey, Kathryn L. ;
Halpern, Elkan F. ;
Rafferty, Elizabeth A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (01) :49-56
[10]   Mammographic screening and mammographic patterns [J].
Day, N ;
Warren, R .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2000, 2 (04) :247-251