HATCH score in the prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter

被引:54
|
作者
Chen, Ke [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Rong [2 ]
Deng, Wenning [2 ]
Gao, Chuanyu [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Xianqing [1 ]
Wang, Shunbao [1 ]
Fu, Haixia [1 ]
Zhao, Yonghui [1 ]
Zhang, Jiaying [1 ]
Dong, Jianzeng [2 ]
Ma, Changsheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Atrial flutter; Catheter ablation; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; ISTHMUS ABLATION; FOLLOW-UP; PROGRESSION; IMPACT; BLOCK; RISK; COMMON; SIZE; AF;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is not uncommon after ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFL); however, limited data are available for a risk prediction model for the future occurrence of AF in patients with typical AFL undergoing successful catheter ablation. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether the HATCH score (which is based on hypertension, age >= 75 years, transient ischemic attack or stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure) is useful for risk prediction of subsequent AF after ablation of typical AFL. METHODS A total of 216 consecutive patients presenting with typical AFL and no history of AF who underwent successful catheter ablation were enrolled in the study. The clinical endpoint was occurrence of new-onset AF during follow-up after ablation. RESULTS During a follow-up period of 29.1 +/- 18.3 months, 85 patients (39%) experienced at least 1 episode of AF. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the HATCH score (hazard ratio 1.784; 95% confidence interval 1.352-2.324; P < .001) and left atrial diameter (hazard ratio 1.270; 95% confidence interval 1.115-1.426; P < .001) were independently associated with new-onset AF after typical AFL ablation. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve based on the HATCH score for prediction of new-onset AF was 0.743. The HATCH score could be used to stratify the patients into 2 groups with different incidences of new-onset AF (69% vs 27%, P < .001) at a cutoff value of 2. CONCLUSIONS The HATCH score is a useful predictor of new-onset AF after typical AFL ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:1483 / 1489
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation: a long-term follow-up
    Bandini, Alberto
    Golia, Paolo
    Caroli, Elena
    Biancoli, Stefano
    Galvani, Marcello
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (02) : 110 - 115
  • [22] Significance of fragmented QRS complexes for predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation
    Fujimoto, Yuhi
    Yodogawa, Kenji
    Oka, Eiichiro
    Hayashi, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Teppei
    Murata, Hiroshige
    Iwasaki, Yu-ki
    Hayashi, Meiso
    Shimizu, Wataru
    HEART RHYTHM, 2020, 17 (09) : 1493 - 1499
  • [23] Incidence and predictive factors of atrial fibrillation after ablation of typical atrial flutter
    Valérie Laurent
    Laurent Fauchier
    Bertrand Pierre
    Caroline Grimard
    Dominique Babuty
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2009, 24 : 119 - 125
  • [24] Association of typical atrial flutter and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation on clinical recurrence after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Jeong, Joo Hee
    Lee, Hyoung Seok
    Choi, Yun Young
    Kim, Yun Gi
    Choi, Jong-Il
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Lim, Hong Euy
    Oh, Il-Young
    Cha, Myung-Jin
    Lee, So-Ryoung
    Kim, Ju Youn
    Kwon, Chang Hee
    Lee, Sung Ho
    Park, Junbeom
    Kim, Ki-Hun
    Yang, Pil-Sung
    Kim, Jun-Hyung
    Shim, Jaemin
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [25] Incidence and clinical predictors of subsequent atrial fibrillation requiring additional ablation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter
    De Bortoli, Alessandro
    Shi, Li-Bin
    Ohm, Ole-Jorgen
    Hoff, Per Ivar
    Schuster, Peter
    Solheim, Eivind
    Chen, Jian
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2017, 51 (03) : 123 - 128
  • [26] Prediction of Clinical Atrial Fibrillation induced during Typical Atrial Flutter Ablation
    Romero, Jorge
    Estrada, Rodolfo
    Holmes, Anthony
    Goodman, David
    Roth, Norman
    Golive, Anjani
    Doshi, Jay
    Manheimer, Eric
    Fisher, John D.
    Gross, Jay
    Krumerman, Andrew
    Ferrick, Kevin
    Kim, Soo
    Di Biase, Luigi
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [27] Navigating the risk of atrial fibrillation after successful ablation of lone typical atrial flutter
    Dixit, Sanjay
    Raad, Mohamad
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (02):
  • [28] Spontaneous Transition from Atrial Fibrillation to Typical Atrial Flutter during Catheter Ablation of the Pulmonary Vein
    Ming-Hsiung Hsieh
    Ching-Tai Tai
    Paul Chan
    Shih-Ann Chen
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2004, 10 : 289 - 291
  • [29] Cavotricuspid isthmus line in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with or without history of typical atrial flutter: A meta-analysis
    Romero, Jorge
    Patel, Kavisha
    Briceno, David
    Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya
    Gabr, Mohamed
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Alviz, Isabella
    Polanco, Dalvert
    Della Rocca, Domenico G.
    Mohanty, Prasant
    Mohanty, Sanghamitra
    Trivedi, Chintan
    Natale, Andrea
    Di Biase, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (08) : 1987 - 1995
  • [30] Disease progression after ablation for atrial flutter compared with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study
    Skjoth, Flemming
    Vadmann, Henrik
    Hjortshoj, Soren Pihlkjaer
    Riahi, Sam
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 72 (11)