Expander/Implant Removal After Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of Risk Factors and Timeline

被引:31
|
作者
Ozturk, Cemile Nurdan [1 ]
Ozturk, Can [1 ]
Soucise, Allison [1 ]
Platek, Mary [1 ,2 ]
Ahsan, Nabiha [3 ]
Lohman, Robert [1 ]
Moon, Wong [1 ]
Djohan, Risal [4 ]
机构
[1] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Head Neck & Plast Surg, Elm & Carlton St, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[2] Buffalo State Coll, Dept Hlth Nutr & Dietet, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Jacobs Sch Med, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Plast Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Tissue expander; Implant; Explantation; Infection; Breast; Removal; Prosthetic; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; TISSUE EXPANDER; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; IMPLANT; COMPLICATIONS; SURGEONS; OUTCOMES; SALVAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-017-1031-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Removal of tissue expanders (TE) or implants is a dire consequence of breast reconstruction, and has the potential to halt the reconstructive efforts. Our goals were to characterize a cohort of patients with TE/implant removal, to perform a time-based analysis, and to review the bacteriology associated with explanted devices. Review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent TE/implant removal. Patient characteristics, surgical technique, adjuvant therapies, indications, complications, culture results were obtained. Data were analyzed according to timing of explantation. A total of 55 TE and implants were removed in 43 patients. Reasons for explantation were infection (58%), patient request (22%), and wound-related complications (20%). The majority of explantations occurred after 30 days (62%), and after Stage I (81%). Median days to explantation was 62. Patients of older age (p = 0.01) and higher BMI (p = 0.02) were more likely to undergo explantation after Stage I. The most commonly cultured organisms were S. epidermidis (10.9%), S. aureus (10.9%) and P. aeruginosa (10.9%). Antibiotic resistance was commonly encountered for ampicillin, cefazolin, penicillin, and erythromycin. Infection is the most common reason for explantation after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Patients should be carefully monitored for a prolonged period of time after Stage I, as the majority of explantations occur in this stage but beyond 30 days. For oral treatment, fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and for IV treatment a combination of vancomycin or daptomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam or imipenems/carbapenems appear to be appropriate choices according to our culture results. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 72
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of Perioperative Versus Extended Courses of Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Zhang, Casey
    Moroni, Elizabeth A.
    Bustos, Samyd S.
    de la Cruz, Carolyn
    Gimbel, Michael L.
    Nguyen, Vu T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (6S) : S593 - S597
  • [22] The Timing of Breast Irradiation in Two-Stage Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Yan, Chen
    Fischer, John P.
    Freedman, Gary M.
    Basta, Marten N.
    Kovach, Stephen J.
    Serletti, Joseph M.
    Lin, Lilie
    Wu, Liza C.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (03) : 322 - 329
  • [23] Complications After Immediate 2-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction A Deeper Look at the Second Stage
    Park, Jin-Woo
    Jung, Jae Hoon
    Jeon, Byung-Joon
    Mun, Goo-Hyun
    Bang, Sa Ik
    Pyon, Jai-Kyong
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (06) : 638 - 643
  • [24] A Comparative Analysis of Cryopreserved Versus Prehydrated Human Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction
    Seth, Akhil K.
    Persing, Scott
    Connor, Caitlin M.
    Davila, Armando
    Hirsch, Elliot
    Fine, Neil A.
    Kim, John Y. S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 70 (06) : 632 - 635
  • [25] Risk Factors for Unplanned Reoperation during the Expansion Phase in Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction in the Dutch Breast Implant Registry
    Vrolijk, J. Juliet
    Bargon, Claudia A.
    Becherer, Babette E.
    Wilschut, Janneke A.
    van Bommel, Annelotte C. M.
    Hommes, Juliette E.
    Keuter, Xavier H. A.
    Young-Afat, Danny A.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    van der Hulst, Rene R. J. W.
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Rakhorst, Hinne A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (01) : 33e - 43e
  • [26] Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: failure rate when radiating the tissue expander or the permanent implant-a meta-analysis
    Fuertes, Victor
    Frances, Monica
    Casarrubios, Jose M.
    Fernandez-Palacios, Javier
    Maria Gonzalez, Jesus
    Francisco Loro-Ferrer, Juan
    GLAND SURGERY, 2020, 9 (02) : 209 - 218
  • [27] Invited Discussion on: Management of Expander and Implant Associated Infections in Breast Reconstruction
    Luís Ricardo Martinhão Souto
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2020, 44 : 2083 - 2088
  • [28] Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Resistance in Surgical Site Infection After Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction of the Breast
    McCullough, Meghan C.
    Chu, Carrie K.
    Duggal, Claire S.
    Losken, Albert
    Carlson, Grant W.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 77 (05) : 501 - 505
  • [29] Expander/implant breast reconstruction before radiotherapy. Outcomes in a single-institute cohort
    Aristei, C.
    Falcinelli, L.
    Bini, V.
    Palumbo, I.
    Farneti, A.
    Petitto, R. P.
    Gori, S.
    Perrucci, E.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (12) : 1074 - 1079
  • [30] Short-term outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction using an implant or tissue expander after mastectomy in breast cancer patients
    Se Won Kim
    Hae Kyung Lee
    Sun Mi Kang
    Tae Ho Kang
    Chan Seok Yoon
    Seung Sang Ko
    Min Hee Hur
    Sung Soo Kang
    Chul Hwan Seul
    Ja Sung Gu
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 279 - 285