Expander/Implant Removal After Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of Risk Factors and Timeline

被引:31
|
作者
Ozturk, Cemile Nurdan [1 ]
Ozturk, Can [1 ]
Soucise, Allison [1 ]
Platek, Mary [1 ,2 ]
Ahsan, Nabiha [3 ]
Lohman, Robert [1 ]
Moon, Wong [1 ]
Djohan, Risal [4 ]
机构
[1] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Head Neck & Plast Surg, Elm & Carlton St, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[2] Buffalo State Coll, Dept Hlth Nutr & Dietet, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Jacobs Sch Med, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Plast Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Tissue expander; Implant; Explantation; Infection; Breast; Removal; Prosthetic; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; TISSUE EXPANDER; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; IMPLANT; COMPLICATIONS; SURGEONS; OUTCOMES; SALVAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-017-1031-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Removal of tissue expanders (TE) or implants is a dire consequence of breast reconstruction, and has the potential to halt the reconstructive efforts. Our goals were to characterize a cohort of patients with TE/implant removal, to perform a time-based analysis, and to review the bacteriology associated with explanted devices. Review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent TE/implant removal. Patient characteristics, surgical technique, adjuvant therapies, indications, complications, culture results were obtained. Data were analyzed according to timing of explantation. A total of 55 TE and implants were removed in 43 patients. Reasons for explantation were infection (58%), patient request (22%), and wound-related complications (20%). The majority of explantations occurred after 30 days (62%), and after Stage I (81%). Median days to explantation was 62. Patients of older age (p = 0.01) and higher BMI (p = 0.02) were more likely to undergo explantation after Stage I. The most commonly cultured organisms were S. epidermidis (10.9%), S. aureus (10.9%) and P. aeruginosa (10.9%). Antibiotic resistance was commonly encountered for ampicillin, cefazolin, penicillin, and erythromycin. Infection is the most common reason for explantation after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Patients should be carefully monitored for a prolonged period of time after Stage I, as the majority of explantations occur in this stage but beyond 30 days. For oral treatment, fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and for IV treatment a combination of vancomycin or daptomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam or imipenems/carbapenems appear to be appropriate choices according to our culture results. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 72
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Expander/Implant Removal After Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of Risk Factors and Timeline
    Cemile Nurdan Ozturk
    Can Ozturk
    Allison Soucise
    Mary Platek
    Nabiha Ahsan
    Robert Lohman
    Wong Moon
    Risal Djohan
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2018, 42 : 64 - 72
  • [2] Management of Expander- and Implant-Associated Infections in Breast Reconstruction
    Ozturk, Can
    Ozturk, Cemile N.
    Platek, Mary
    Soucise, Allison
    Laub, Peter
    Morin, Nabiha
    Lohman, Robert
    Moon, Wong
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 44 (06) : 2075 - 2082
  • [3] Body Mass Index as a Continuous Predictor of Outcomes After Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Nguyen, Khang T.
    Hanwright, Philip J.
    Smetona, John T.
    Hirsch, Elliot M.
    Seth, Akhil K.
    Kim, John Y. S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 73 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [4] Analysis of Risk Factors for Complications in Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction by Stage of Reconstruction
    Hirsch, Elliot M.
    Seth, Akhil K.
    Kim, John Y. S.
    Dumanian, Gregory A.
    Mustoe, Thomas A.
    Galiano, Robert D.
    Fine, Neil A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (05) : 692E - 699E
  • [5] Analysis of factors that affect drainage volume after expander-based breast reconstruction
    Lim, Yoon Min
    Lew, Dae Hyun
    Roh, Tai Suk
    Song, Seung Yong
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2020, 47 (01): : 33 - 41
  • [6] Risk Factors for Complications Differ Between Stages of Tissue-Expander Breast Reconstruction
    Lovecchio, Francis
    Jordan, Sumanas W.
    Lim, Seokchun
    Fine, Neil A.
    Kim, John Y. S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 75 (03) : 275 - 280
  • [7] Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Using Tissue Expander and Implant Reconstruction
    Huber, Katherine M.
    Zemina, Kristen L.
    Tugertimur, Bugra
    Killebrew, Sequoya R.
    Wilson, Augustine Reid
    DallaRosa, Johnathon V.
    Prabhakaran, Sangeetha
    Dayicioglu, Deniz
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 76 : S316 - S319
  • [8] Complications After Two-Stage Expander Implant Breast Reconstruction Requiring Reoperation A Critical Analysis of Outcomes
    Sue, Gloria R.
    Sun, Beatrice J.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 : S292 - S294
  • [9] Implications of Long-term Indwelling of Tissue Expander in Breast Reconstruction: Risk of Expander Rupturing
    Fujii, Takaaki
    Yajima, Reina
    Kuwano, Hiroyuki
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (08) : 4337 - 4340
  • [10] Invited Discussion on: Management of Expander and Implant Associated Infections in Breast Reconstruction
    Souto, Luis Ricardo Martinhao
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 44 (06) : 2083 - 2088