Viewing objects and planning actions: On the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects

被引:86
作者
Makris, Stergios [1 ]
Hadar, Aviad A. [1 ]
Yarrow, Kielan [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Dept Psychol, London EC1V 0HB, England
关键词
Visual perception; Motor planning; Affordances; Tool-objects; TMS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; NEURAL PROCESSES; AFFORDANCE; PERCEPTION; COMPONENTS; ACTIVATION; SELECTION; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
How do humans interact with tools? Gibson (1979) suggested that humans perceive directly what tools afford in terms of meaningful actions. This "affordances" hypothesis implies that visual objects can potentiate motor responses even in the absence of an intention to act. Here we explore the temporal evolution of motor plans afforded by common objects. We presented objects that have a strong significance for action (pinching and grasping) and objects with no such significance. Two experimental tasks involved participants viewing objects presented on a computer screen. For the first task, they were instructed to respond rapidly to changes in background colour by using an apparatus mimicking precision and power grip responses. For the second task, they received stimulation of their primary motor cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while passively viewing the objects. Muscular responses (motor evoked potentials: MEPs) were recorded from two intrinsic hand muscles (associated with either a precision or power grip). The data showed an interaction between type of response (or muscle) and type of object, with both reaction time and MEP measures implying the generation of a congruent motor plan in the period immediately after object presentation. The results provide further support for the notion that the physical properties of objects automatically activate specific motor codes, but also demonstrate that this influence is rapid and relatively short lived. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Attentional processes link perception and action [J].
Anderson, SJ ;
Yamagishi, N ;
Karavia, V .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 269 (1497) :1225-1232
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization
[3]   Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study [J].
Buccino, Giovanni ;
Sato, Marc ;
Cattaneo, Luigi ;
Roda, Francesca ;
Riggio, Lucia .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (14) :3074-3078
[4]   Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream [J].
Chao, LL ;
Martin, A .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 12 (04) :478-484
[5]   Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis [J].
Cisek, Paul .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 362 (1485) :1585-1599
[6]   Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: A computational model [J].
Cisek, Paul .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (38) :9761-9770
[7]   Action for perception:: A motor-visual attentional effect [J].
Craighero, L ;
Fadiga, L ;
Rizzolatti, G ;
Umiltà, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1999, 25 (06) :1673-1692
[8]   Evidence for visuomotor priming effect [J].
Craighero, L ;
Fadiga, L ;
Umilta, CA ;
Rizzolatti, G .
NEUROREPORT, 1996, 8 (01) :347-349
[9]   Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects [J].
Ellis, R ;
Tucker, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 91 :451-471
[10]  
Gibson J.J., 1971, LEONARDO, V4, P27, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2307/1572228, DOI 10.2307/1572228]