Reexamining the science of marine protected areas: linking knowledge to action

被引:147
|
作者
Fox, Helen E. [1 ]
Mascia, Michael B. [1 ]
Basurto, Xavier [2 ]
Costa, Alice [3 ]
Glew, Louise [1 ]
Heinemann, Dennis [4 ]
Karrer, Leah B. [5 ]
Lester, Sarah E. [6 ]
Lombana, Alfonso V. [1 ]
Pomeroy, Robert S. [7 ]
Recchia, Cheri A. [8 ]
Roberts, Callum M. [9 ]
Sanchirico, James N. [10 ,13 ]
Pet-Soede, Lida [11 ]
White, Alan T. [12 ]
机构
[1] World Wildlife Fund USA, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Marine Lab, Nicholas Sch Environm, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
[3] WWF Mozambique Coordinat Off, Sommerchield, Maputo, Mozambique
[4] Ocean Conservancy, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[5] Conservat Int, Marine Management Area Sci Program, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
[6] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Inst Marine Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[7] Univ Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[8] Calif Ocean Sci Trust, Marine Protected Areas Monitoring Enterprise, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[9] Univ York, Dept Environm, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[10] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[11] WWF Indonesia, Coral Triangle Network Initiat, Umalas, Bali, Indonesia
[12] TNC Asia Pacific Program, Honolulu, HI 96817 USA
[13] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2012年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Marine reserves; marine policy; fisheries; impact evaluation; adaptive management; CORAL-REEFS; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; RESERVES; FISH; FISHERIES; HABITAT; LONG; CONNECTIVITY; PHILIPPINES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00207.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are often implemented to conserve or restore species, fisheries, habitats, ecosystems, and ecological functions and services; buffer against the ecological effects of climate change; and alleviate poverty in coastal communities. Scientific research provides valuable insights into the social and ecological impacts of MPAs, as well as the factors that shape these impacts, providing useful guidance or rules of thumb for science-based MPA policy. Both ecological and social factors foster effective MPAs, including substantial coverage of representative habitats and oceanographic conditions; diverse size and spacing; protection of habitat bottlenecks; participatory decision-making arrangements; bounded and contextually appropriate resource use rights; active and accountable monitoring and enforcement systems; and accessible conflict resolution mechanisms. For MPAs to realize their full potential as a tool for ocean governance, further advances in policy-relevant MPA science are required. These research frontiers include MPA impacts on nontarget and wide-ranging species and habitats; impacts beyond MPA boundaries, on ecosystem services, and on resource-dependent human populations, as well as potential scale mismatches of ecosystem service flows. Explicitly treating MPAs as policy experiments and employing the tools of impact evaluation holds particular promise as a way for policy-relevant science to inform and advance science-based MPA policy.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Marine Protected Areas and Area-Based Management in New Zealand
    Mossop, Joanna
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OCEAN LAW AND POLICY, 2020, 5 (01) : 169 - 185
  • [32] The contribution of very large marine protected areas to marine conservation: Giant leaps or smoke and mirrors?
    Singleton, Rebecca L.
    Roberts, Callum M.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2014, 87 (1-2) : 7 - 10
  • [33] MARINE PROTECTED AREAS IN THE HIGH SEAS AND THEIR IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL FISHING AGREEMENTS
    Punt, Maarten J.
    Weikard, Hans-Peter
    Van Ierland, Ekko C.
    NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2013, 26 (02) : 164 - 193
  • [34] Environmental fluctuations and asymmetrical dispersal: generalized stability theory for studying metapopulation persistence and marine protected areas
    Aiken, Christopher M.
    Navarrete, Sergio A.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2011, 428 : 77 - 88
  • [35] Opportunities to close the gap between science and practice for Marine Protected Areas in Brazil
    Mills, Morena
    Magris, Rafael A.
    Fuentes, Mariana M. P. B.
    Bonaldo, Roberta
    Herbst, Dannieli F.
    Lima, Monique C. S.
    Kerber, Isabela K. G.
    Gerhardinger, Leopoldo C.
    de Moura, Rodrigo L.
    Domit, Camila
    Teixeira, Joao B.
    Pinheiro, Hudson T.
    Vianna, Gabriel
    de Freitas, Rodrigo Rodrigues
    PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 18 (03) : 161 - 168
  • [36] Trophic ecology of the gopher rockfish Sebastes carnatus inside and outside of central California marine protected areas
    Loury, Erin K.
    Bros, Shannon M.
    Starr, Richard M.
    Ebert, David A.
    Cailliet, Gregor M.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2015, 536 : 229 - 241
  • [37] Evaluating marine protected areas for managing marine resource conflict in Hawaii
    Stevenson, Todd C.
    Tissot, Brian N.
    MARINE POLICY, 2013, 39 : 215 - 223
  • [38] Optimal Siting, Sizing, and Enforcement of Marine Protected Areas
    Albers, H. J.
    Preonas, L.
    Capitan, T.
    Robinson, E. J. Z.
    Madrigal-Ballestero, R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 77 (01) : 229 - 269
  • [39] Marine protected areas: Re-thinking their inception
    Chuenpagdee, Ratana
    Pascual-Fernandez, Jose J.
    Szelianszky, Emese
    Luis Alegret, Juan
    Fraga, Julia
    Jentoft, Svein
    MARINE POLICY, 2013, 39 : 234 - 240
  • [40] Marine protected areas in a welfare-based perspective
    Reithe, Siv
    Armstrong, Claire W.
    Flaaten, Ola
    MARINE POLICY, 2014, 49 : 29 - 36