Multi-objective optimal power flow model for power system operation dispatching

被引:0
|
作者
Tan, Shuwen [1 ]
Lin, Shunjiang [1 ]
Yang, Liuqing [1 ]
Zhang, Anqi [1 ]
Shi, Weiwei [1 ]
Feng, Hanzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] S China Univ Technol, Sch Elect Power Engn, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
2013 IEEE PES ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC) | 2013年
关键词
Multi-objective optimal power flow; Pareto frontier; Normal Boundary Intersection method; optimal dispatching; Power system; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM; SECURITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
For the basic requirements of power system operation of security, high quality, economy, environmental protection, a multi-objective optimal power flow(MOPF) model is established to minimize three objective functions of load buses voltage deviations, network active power loss, pollution gas emissions and meanwhile to satisfy the security constraints of power transmission limits in lines. The normal boundary intersection method (NBI) is adopted to transform three-objective optimal power flow model into a series of single-objective optimization model, and then the interior point method is used to obtain the evenly distributed Pareto frontier in objective functions space. According to fuzzy membership and entropy weight of various targets, the comprehensive compromise optimal solution can be identified from the Pareto frontier surface, which is employed as the operation dispatching scheme of the system. By the multi-objective optimization calculation of the IEEE 9-buses system and the IEEE 39-buses system, the results validate the effectiveness of the proposed model and algorithm, and indicate that the comprehensive compromised optimal solution can be used as an optimal dispatching scheme of power system operation.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-objective optimal power flow solutions using a constraint handling technique of evolutionary algorithms
    Biswas, Partha P.
    Suganthan, P. N.
    Mallipeddi, R.
    Amaratunga, Gehan A. J.
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (04) : 2999 - 3023
  • [42] TOPSIS-Q(λ) Learning for Multi-objective Optimal Carbon Emission Flow of Power Grid
    Tang, Jie
    Zhang, Xiaoshun
    Cheng, Lefeng
    Yu, Tao
    Pan, Bin
    Guo, Lexin
    Tan, Min
    2015 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT MATERIALS AND MECHATRONICS (IMM 2015), 2015, : 20 - 26
  • [43] Multi-objective Optimal Power Flow Using Fuzzy Satisfactory Stochastic Optimization
    Muangkhiew, Prakaipetch
    Chayakulkheeree, Keerati
    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (03): : 281 - 290
  • [44] Differential search algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem
    Abaci, Kadir
    Yamacli, Volkan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 79 : 1 - 10
  • [45] A new meta-heuristic programming for multi-objective optimal power flow
    Daqaq, Fatima
    Ouassaid, Mohammed
    Ellaia, Rachid
    ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 103 (02) : 1217 - 1237
  • [46] A new meta-heuristic programming for multi-objective optimal power flow
    Fatima Daqaq
    Mohammed Ouassaid
    Rachid Ellaia
    Electrical Engineering, 2021, 103 : 1217 - 1237
  • [47] Optimization of Optimal Power Flow Problem Using Multi-Objective Manta Ray Foraging Optimizer
    Kahraman, Hamdi Tolga
    Akbel, Mustafa
    Duman, Serhat
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 116
  • [48] Modified Tasmanian devil optimization for solving single and multi-objective optimal power flow in conventional and advanced power systems
    Farhat, Mohamed
    Kamel, Salah
    Abdelaziz, Almoataz Y.
    CLUSTER COMPUTING-THE JOURNAL OF NETWORKS SOFTWARE TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2025, 28 (02):
  • [49] Solution of multi-objective optimal power flow using efficient meta-heuristic algorithm
    Reddy, S. Surender
    ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 100 (02) : 401 - 413
  • [50] A modified teaching-learning based optimization for multi-objective optimal power flow problem
    Shabanpour-Haghighi, Amin
    Seifi, Ali Reza
    Niknam, Taher
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 77 : 597 - 607