Multi-objective optimal power flow model for power system operation dispatching

被引:0
|
作者
Tan, Shuwen [1 ]
Lin, Shunjiang [1 ]
Yang, Liuqing [1 ]
Zhang, Anqi [1 ]
Shi, Weiwei [1 ]
Feng, Hanzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] S China Univ Technol, Sch Elect Power Engn, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
2013 IEEE PES ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC) | 2013年
关键词
Multi-objective optimal power flow; Pareto frontier; Normal Boundary Intersection method; optimal dispatching; Power system; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM; SECURITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
For the basic requirements of power system operation of security, high quality, economy, environmental protection, a multi-objective optimal power flow(MOPF) model is established to minimize three objective functions of load buses voltage deviations, network active power loss, pollution gas emissions and meanwhile to satisfy the security constraints of power transmission limits in lines. The normal boundary intersection method (NBI) is adopted to transform three-objective optimal power flow model into a series of single-objective optimization model, and then the interior point method is used to obtain the evenly distributed Pareto frontier in objective functions space. According to fuzzy membership and entropy weight of various targets, the comprehensive compromise optimal solution can be identified from the Pareto frontier surface, which is employed as the operation dispatching scheme of the system. By the multi-objective optimization calculation of the IEEE 9-buses system and the IEEE 39-buses system, the results validate the effectiveness of the proposed model and algorithm, and indicate that the comprehensive compromised optimal solution can be used as an optimal dispatching scheme of power system operation.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cooperative constrained multi-objective dual-population evolutionary algorithm for optimal dispatching of wind-power integrated power system
    Zhang, Zhen
    Zhang, Huifeng
    Tian, Yazhang
    Li, Chongwei
    Yue, Dong
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2024, 87
  • [22] Multi-Objective Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch for Distribution System
    Singh, Himmat
    Srivastava, Laxmi
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER, CONTROL, SIGNALS AND INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERING (ICPCSI), 2017, : 558 - 563
  • [23] Improved gravitational search algorithm and novel power flow prediction network for multi-objective optimal active dispatching problems
    Qian, Jie
    Wang, Ping
    Chen, Gonggui
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 223
  • [24] Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Considering Emissions and Voltage Violations
    Kravits, Jacob
    Baker, Kyri
    Kasprzyk, Joseph
    2021 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2021,
  • [25] Multi-Objective Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer for Optimal Power Flow
    Mohamed, Al-Attar Ali
    El-Gaafary, Ahmed A. M.
    Mohamed, Yahia S.
    Hemeida, Ashraf Mohamed
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL MIDDLE EAST POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (MEPCON), 2016, : 982 - 990
  • [26] Comfort loss associated with automated demand response for multi-objective optimal power flow
    Safarzaei, Mohsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2021, 128
  • [27] Artificial bee colony algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem
    Adaryani, M. Rezaei
    Karami, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2013, 53 : 219 - 230
  • [28] Multi-objective optimal power flow using grasshopper optimization algorithm
    Mandal, Barun
    Roy, Provas Kumar
    OPTIMAL CONTROL APPLICATIONS & METHODS, 2024, 45 (02) : 623 - 645
  • [29] Analysis on Coordinated Power-Transportation System Operation Based on Multi-objective Optimization
    Lyu S.
    Wei Z.
    Ma J.
    Chen S.
    Peng Y.
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46 (12): : 98 - 106
  • [30] Multi-objective optimal power flow calculation considering wind power confidence risk cost
    Wen Z.
    Peng C.
    Sun H.
    Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2020, 48 (24): : 36 - 43