Prediction of Pillar Stability for Underground Mines Using the Stochastic Gradient Boosting Technique

被引:35
作者
Ding, Hangxing [1 ]
Li, Guanghui [1 ]
Dong, Xin [1 ]
Lin, Yun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Resource & Civil Engn, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Resources & Safety Engn, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Civil Environm & Min Engn, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2018年 / 6卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Pillar stability; stochastic gradient boosting (SGB); 10-fold cross-validation; ROC curve; relative variable importance; DESIGN; STRENGTH; MACHINE; CLASSIFICATION; RELIABILITY; DAMAGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2880466
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The prediction of pillar stability is of great importance because pillar failure can lead to large disasters. In this paper, a stochastic gradient boosting (SGB) model was applied to classify pillar stability. Five potentially relevant factors, including the pillar width, the pillar height, the ratio of the pillar width to the pillar height, the uniaxial compressive strength of the rock, and the pillar stress, were chosen to establish the evaluation index system. The 205 pillar samples were collected, and an SGB model was developed by training 80% of original data (165 samples), and the optimal parameter values of the model were achieved by the method of 10-fold cross-validation. The external testing set (with 40 samples) was used to validate the feasibility of the SGB model. The accuracy and kappa analysis, together with the three within-class classification metrics (recall, precision, and F-measure), and receiver operating characteristic curve were utilized to evaluate the performance of the optimum SGB, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and MLPNN models. The results revealed that the SGB model has higher credibility than the RF, SVM, and MLPNN models. The sensitivity of the parameters was investigated based on the relative variable importance, in which the pillar stress and the ratio of the pillar width to the pillar height were found to be the major influencing variables for pillar stability.
引用
收藏
页码:69253 / 69264
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], P 3 INT S ROCKB SEIS
  • [2] Boosting for high-dimensional two-class prediction
    Blagus, Rok
    Lusa, Lara
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 16
  • [3] Brady B., 2004, Rock mechanics for underground mining
  • [4] Modeling Uncertainties in Mining Pillar Stability Analysis
    Cauvin, Maxime
    Verdel, Thierry
    Salmon, Romuald
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (10) : 1371 - 1380
  • [5] Pillar design by combining finite element methods, neural networks and reliability: a case study of the Feng Huangshan copper mine, China
    Deng, J
    Yue, ZQ
    Tham, LG
    Zhu, HH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2003, 40 (04) : 585 - 599
  • [6] Sensitivity Analysis of k-Fold Cross Validation in Prediction Error Estimation
    Diego Rodriguez, Juan
    Perez, Aritz
    Antonio Lozano, Jose
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 32 (03) : 569 - 575
  • [7] Discrimination of Mine Seismic Events and Blasts Using the Fisher Classifier, Naive Bayesian Classifier and Logistic Regression
    Dong, Longjun
    Wesseloo, Johan
    Potvin, Yves
    Li, Xibing
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2016, 49 (01) : 183 - 211
  • [8] Pillar strength in underground stone mines in the United States
    Esterhuizen, G. S.
    Dolinar, D. R.
    Ellenberger, J. L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2011, 48 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [9] Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
    Friedman, JH
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2001, 29 (05) : 1189 - 1232
  • [10] Stochastic gradient boosting
    Friedman, JH
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2002, 38 (04) : 367 - 378