Long-term longevity and clinical outcomes of Linox S/SD implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a single-center experience

被引:3
作者
Alasti, Mohammad [1 ]
Machado, Colin [1 ]
Mirzaee, Sam [1 ]
Healy, Stewart [1 ]
Bittinger, Logan [1 ]
Adam, David [1 ]
Kotschet, Emily [1 ]
Krafchek, Jack [1 ]
Alison, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Med Ctr, MonashHeart, Monash Cardiac Rhythm Management Dept, 246 Clayton Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
Biotronik; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Lead failure; Linox; Survival; Vigila; INSULATION FAILURE; BIOTRONIK LINOX; FOLLOW-UP; CONDUCTOR;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-020-00787-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Since the introduction of the Biotronik Linox S/SD leads in 2006, there have been multiple reports of premature lead failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the longevity of the Linox S/SD leads and to identify the possible predictors of lead failure in a single tertiary implant center. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent implantation of Linox S/SD leads or Sorin Vigila 1CR/2CR leads (the same Linox S/SD leads marketed by Sorin) at our center. The cumulative lead survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curve, and variables associated with lead failure were assessed by Cox proportional hazard model. Results A total of 187 patients (154 (82%) male) underwent Linox S/SD or Vigila 1CR/2CR implantation between 2007 and 2013. During follow-up with a median time of 75 months, nine lead failures were identified (4.8%). The mean and median times from lead implantation to lead failure were 70.7 +/- 21 months and 64 (45-111) months, respectively. The cumulative survival probability for the Linox S/SD at 5 years was 97.1% and at 12 years was 90.3%. Non-physiological high-rate sensing was the most common type of lead failure in patients. In two-thirds of these patients, this led to inappropriate shock. We did not find any significant relationships between patients' clinical and procedural characteristics and lead failure. Conclusions At our center, the 5-year lead survival of the Linox S/SD has been better than reports from other centers. The majority of lead failures presented as non-physiological high-rate sensing with subsequent inappropriate therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Al-Khatib SM, 2018, CIRCULATION, V138, pE210, DOI [10.1161/CIR.0000000000000549, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000548]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, BIOTRONIK PRODUCT PE
  • [3] Externalized conductors and insulation failure in Biotronik defibrillator leads: History repeating or a false alarm?
    De Maria, Elia
    Borghi, Ambra
    Bonetti, Lorenzo
    Fontana, Pier Luigi
    Cappelli, Stefano
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2017, 5 (02) : 27 - 34
  • [4] Long-Term Evaluation of Biotronik Linox and Linoxsmart Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads
    Good, Eric D.
    Cakulev, Ivan
    Orlov, Michael V.
    Hirsh, David
    Simeles, John
    Mohr, Kelly
    Moll, Phil
    Bloom, Heather
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (06) : 735 - 742
  • [5] A randomized study of remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: safety and efficacy report of the ECOST trial
    Guedon-Moreau, Laurence
    Lacroix, Dominique
    Sadoul, Nicolas
    Clementy, Jacques
    Kouakam, Claude
    Hermida, Jean-Sylvain
    Aliot, Etienne
    Boursier, Michel
    Bizeau, Olivier
    Kacet, Salem
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (08) : 605 - 614
  • [6] Insulation Failure of the Linox Defibrillator Lead: A Case Report and Retrospective Review of a Single Center Experience
    Howe, Andrew J.
    McKeag, Nicholas A.
    Wilson, Carol M.
    Ashfield, Kyle P.
    Roberts, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06) : 686 - 689
  • [7] Comparison of longevity and clinical outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads among manufacturers
    Kawada, Satoshi
    Nishii, Nobuhiro
    Morimoto, Yoshimasa
    Miyoshi, Akihito
    Tachibana, Motomi
    Sugiyama, Hiroyasu
    Nakagawa, Koji
    Watanabe, Atsuyuki
    Morita, Hiroshi
    Ito, Hiroshi
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (10) : 1496 - 1503
  • [8] Comparison of lead failure manifestation of Biotronik Linox with St. Jude Medical Riata and Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead
    Lam, Anna
    Buehler, Stefan
    Goulouti, Eleni
    Sweda, Romy
    Haeberlin, Andreas
    Medeiros-Domingo, Argelia
    Servatius, Helge
    Seiler, Jens
    Baldinger, Samuel
    Noti, Fabian
    Tanner, Hildegard
    Roten, Laurent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 54 (02) : 161 - 170
  • [9] Insulation Failure with Externalized Conductor of a Linox SD Lead: A Case Report
    Manfredi, Joseph A.
    Smithgall, Steven M.
    Kircher, Charles M.
    Lollis, Mary A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (04) : 440 - 441
  • [10] Performance of the Linox implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: A single-center experience
    Marai, Ibrahim
    Milman, Anat
    Nof, Eyal
    Gurevitz, Osnat
    Barlev, David
    Lipchenca, Igor
    Bachar, Sharona
    Glikson, Michael
    Beinart, Roy
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (12): : 1524 - 1528