Evaluation of a bundle of care to reduce incisional surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery

被引:5
作者
Phelan, Liam [1 ]
Dilworth, Mark P. [1 ]
Bhangu, Aneel [1 ]
Limbrick, Jack W. [1 ]
King, Stratton [1 ]
Bowley, Doug M. [1 ]
Hardy, Katie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Heartlands Hosp, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham B9 5SS, W Midlands, England
关键词
Surgical wound infection; postoperative complications; surgical procedures; operative; mortality; standards;
D O I
10.1177/1757177419892072
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is associated with morbidity, mortality and increased care costs; many SSIs are considered preventable. The aim of the present study was to test implementation of a pragmatic, evidence-based bundle designed to reduce incisional SSI after emergency laparotomy and elective major lower gastrointestinal surgery. Method: This was a prospective before-and-after study. Data were collected before the intervention and for two separate subsequent time periods. An evidence-based bundle of care (BOC) was implemented; the primary outcome measure was incisional SSI at 30 days. The secondary outcome measure was 30-day unplanned readmissions. The initial post-intervention group, Group 2, assessed a variable number of potential impacting factors; however, due to funding and staffing levels the second post-bundle group, Group 3, focused on the core aspects of the BOC and rates of incisional SSI and readmission. Results: In total, 99 patients were included in the 'before' group; and 71 in Group 2 and 92 in Group 3, the post-intervention groups. The incisional SSI rate was 29.3% (29/99) before and 28.2% (20/71) in Group 2 (P=0.873) and 21.7% (20/92) in Group 3 (P=0.234) after the intervention. After adjustment for confounders, the care bundle was associated with a non-significant reduction in SSI (Group 2: odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45-1.93, P=0.0843). However, it was associated with significantly reduced readmissions 18.1% (18/99) before versus 5.6% (4/71) in Group 2 (OR = 0.236, 95% CI = 0.077-0.72, P=0.012) and 8.7% (8/92) in Group 3 (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.9, P=0.029). Comparing the pre-bundle group to the post-bundle groups, there was an overall significant reduction in readmissions (P=0.003). This implies a number needed to treat of 8-11 patients to prevent one readmission. Adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis with the Trust guidelines increased from 91% to 99% (1 vs. 2, P=0.047). Conclusion: Introduction of the bundle was associated with a reduction in the observed rate of incisional SSI from 29.3% to 21.7%; significantly fewer patients required unplanned readmission. Use of the bundle was associated with significantly improved compliance with appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Risk factors for surgical site infection in cardiac surgery [J].
Goncalves da Silva, Quenia Cristina ;
Barbosa, Maria Helena .
ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2012, 25 :89-95
[42]   Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Pediatric Cardiac Surgery [J].
Ribeiro, Anna Christina de Lima ;
Siciliano, Rinaldo Focaccia ;
Lopes, Antonio Augusto ;
Strabelli, Tania Mara Varejao .
ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 120 (12)
[43]   Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after major abdominal surgery [J].
Ejaz, Aslam ;
Schmidt, Carl ;
Johnston, Fabian M. ;
Frank, Steve M. ;
Pawlik, Timothy M. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 217 :153-159
[44]   Development and Validation of a Model for Predicting Surgical Site Infection After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery [J].
Sheyn, David ;
Gregory, W. Thomas ;
Osazuwa-Peters, Oyomoare ;
Jelovsek, J. Eric .
UROGYNECOLOGY, 2022, 28 (10) :658-666
[45]   SURGICAL SITE INFECTION SURVEILLANCE IN POST-HOSPITAL DISCHARGE AFTER CARDIAC RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY [J].
Menis Sasaki, Vanessa Damiana ;
Romanzini, Adilson Edson ;
Marcielo de Jesus, Ana Paula ;
de Carvalho, Edeva ;
Gomes, Joao Junior ;
Damiano, Valquiria Barco .
TEXTO & CONTEXTO ENFERMAGEM, 2011, 20 (02) :328-332
[46]   Postoperative Changes in Presepsin Level and Values Predictive of Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery [J].
Koakutsu, Tomoaki ;
Sato, Tetsuya ;
Aizawa, Toshimi ;
Itoi, Eiji ;
Kushimoto, Shigeki .
SPINE, 2018, 43 (08) :578-584
[47]   Outcome of Patients with Surgical Site Infection after Craniotomy [J].
Berghmans, Mathilde ;
de Ghellinck, Leopold ;
De Greef, Julien ;
Di Santo, Melissa ;
Ribeiro Vaz, Jose-Geraldo ;
Zech, Francis ;
Belkhir, Leila .
SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2022, 23 (04) :388-393
[48]   Risk Factor of Surgical Site Infection After Pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Sugiura, Teiichi ;
Uesaka, Katsuhiko ;
Ohmagari, Norio ;
Kanemoto, Hideyuki ;
Mizuno, Takashi .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (12) :2888-2894
[49]   Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis and Wound Management in Spine Surgery [J].
White, Alexandra J. ;
Fiani, Brian ;
Jarrah, Ryan ;
Momin, Arbaz A. ;
Rasouli, Jonathan .
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (03) :451-461
[50]   WHAT'S NEW IN INFECTION ON SURGICAL SITE AND ANTIBIOTICOPROPHYLAXIS IN SURGERY? [J].
da Costa, Adriano Carneiro ;
Santa-Cruz, Fernando ;
Ferraz, Alvaro A. B. .
ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (04)