Measurement uncertainty analysis of low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy: post-implant dosimetry

被引:7
作者
Gregory, Kent J. [1 ]
Pattison, John E. [1 ]
Bibbo, Giovanni [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Sch Engn Appl Phys, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[2] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Div Med Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
关键词
LDR brachytherapy; Prostate; D-90; Uncertainty; GUM; CT HEAD SCANS; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; AMERICAN-BRACHYTHERAPY; INTERSEED ATTENUATION; IMPLANT BRACHYTHERAPY; TISSUE COMPOSITION; PERMANENT IMPLANT; STRANDED SEEDS;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-014-0325-2
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The minimal dose covering 90 % of the prostate volume-D (90)-is arguably the most important dosimetric parameter in low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy. In this study an analysis of the measurement uncertainties in D (90) from low-dose-rate prostate seed brachytherapy was conducted for two common treatment procedures with two different post-implant dosimetry methods. The analysis was undertaken in order to determine the magnitude of D (90) uncertainty, how the magnitude of the uncertainty varied when D (90) was calculated using different dosimetry methods, and which factors were the major contributors to the uncertainty. The analysis considered the prostate as being homogeneous and tissue equivalent and made use of published data, as well as original data collected specifically for this analysis, and was performed according to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). It was found that when prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted in two separate sessions using only CT images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 25 % at the 95 % confidence interval. When prostate imaging and seed implantation were conducted during a single session using CT and ultrasound images for post-implant analysis, the expanded uncertainty in D (90) values were about 33 %. Methods for reducing these uncertainty levels are discussed. It was found that variations in contouring the target tissue made the largest contribution to D (90) uncertainty, while the uncertainty in seed source strength made only a small contribution. It is important that clinicians appreciate the overall magnitude of D (90) uncertainty and understand the factors that affect it so that clinical decisions are soundly based, and resources are appropriately allocated.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 81
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The correlation between D90 and outcome for l-125 seed implant monotherapy for localised prostate cancer
    Ash, Dan
    Al-Qaisieh, Bashar
    Bottomley, David
    Carey, Brendan
    Joseph, Joji
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 79 (02) : 185 - 189
  • [2] Bentley R.E., 2003, UNCERTAINTY MEASUREM, V6th
  • [3] Third-party brachytherapy source calibrations and physicist responsibilities: Report of the AAPM Low Energy Brachytherapy Source Calibration Working Group
    Butler, Wayne M.
    Bice, William S., Jr.
    DeWerd, Larry A.
    Hevezi, James M.
    Huq, M. Saiful
    Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
    Palta, Jatinder R.
    Rivard, Mark J.
    Seuntjens, Jan P.
    Thomadsen, Bruce R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (09) : 3860 - 3865
  • [4] A survey of current clinical practice in permanent and temporary prostate brachytherapy: 2010 update
    Buyyounouski, Mark K.
    Davis, Brian J.
    Prestidge, Bradley R.
    Shanahan, Thomas G.
    Stock, Richard G.
    Grimm, Peter D.
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    Zaider, Marco
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2012, 11 (04) : 299 - 305
  • [5] Postimplant dosimetry using a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine:: A new clinical standard
    Carrier, Jean-Francois
    D'Amours, Michel
    Verhaegen, Frank
    Reniers, Brigitte
    Martin, Andre-Guy
    Vigneault, Eric
    Beaulieu, Luc
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (04): : 1190 - 1198
  • [6] Impact of interseed attenuation and tissue composition for permanent prostate implants
    Carrier, JF
    Beaulieu, L
    Therriault-Proulx, F
    Roy, R
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (03) : 595 - 604
  • [7] Dosimetric effects of seed anisotropy and interseed attenuation for 103Pd and 125I prostate implants
    Chibani, O
    Williamson, JF
    Todor, D
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (08) : 2557 - 2566
  • [8] American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for transrectal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy
    Davis, Brian J.
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Lee, W. Robert
    Crook, Juanita M.
    Stock, Richard G.
    Merrick, Gregory S.
    Butler, Wayne M.
    Grimm, Peter D.
    Stone, Nelson N.
    Potters, Louis
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2012, 11 (01) : 6 - 19
  • [9] Accuracy of seed reconstruction in prostate postplanning studied with a CT- and MRI-compatible phantom
    De Brabandere, Marisol
    Kirisits, Christian
    Peeters, Ronald
    Haustermans, Karin
    Van den Heuvel, Frank
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 79 (02) : 190 - 197
  • [10] Prostate post-implant dosimetry: Interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion
    De Brabandere, Marisol
    Hoskin, Peter
    Haustermans, Karin
    Van den Heuvel, Frank
    Siebert, Frank-Andre
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 104 (02) : 192 - 198