Validation of a nonlinear force method for large deformations in shape-morphing structures

被引:6
|
作者
du Pasquier, Cosima [1 ]
Shea, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Engn Design & Comp Lab, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Shape morphing; Nonlinear force method; Stochastic optimization; Sensitivity analysis; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-022-03187-z
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Reducing energy and material consumption is a priority for the construction, aerospace, and automotive industries. Shape morphing addresses these concerns by broadening the band of functionality of a structure by adapting its shape to an external stimulus, such as pressure, or an internal stimulus, such as embedded actuation. This work outlines the development of an actuator placement optimization method for overdeterminate lattice structures with the objective of achieving predetermined large shape changes accurately. The deformation is modeled with both a linear and a nonlinear force method to determine their validity for large-shape change and their usefulness for the field of shape morphing. The linear and nonlinear methods are compared in four benchmark problems and two case studies relevant to the field of shape morphing. The nonlinear method is shown to achieve a level of accuracy 10(2) to 10(4) higher compared to FEM simulation, while using 23% fewer actuators and up to 77.3% less elongation of actuators, which makes it more favorable for shape-morphing applications. Two case studies for applications in aerospace and construction show that the nonlinear force method is better equipped for large shape change in overdeterminate meshed freeform target shapes and doubly curved surfaces with a high variable density. However, the nonlinear force method is less computationally efficient than the linear force method, as expected. A judicious choice of constraints can help reduce the run time.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of a nonlinear force method for large deformations in shape-morphing structures
    Cosima du Pasquier
    Kristina Shea
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2022, 65
  • [2] Magnetothermal Shape-Morphing of Thermoset Structures
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Wang, Xubin
    Li, Zhen
    Wei, Huangsan
    Tang, Jingda
    Wang, Tiejun
    ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES, 2025, 10 (06):
  • [3] Shape-morphing structures based on perforated kirigami
    Zhang, Yunlan
    Yang, Jingyi
    Liu, Mingchao
    Vella, Dominic
    EXTREME MECHANICS LETTERS, 2022, 56
  • [4] Controlled shape-morphing metallic components for deployable structures
    McCue, Ian D.
    Valentino, Gianna M.
    Trigg, Douglas B.
    Lennon, Andrew M.
    Hebert, Chuck E.
    Seker, Drew P.
    Nimer, Salahudin M.
    Mastandrea, James P.
    Trexler, Morgana M.
    Storck, Steven M.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2021, 208
  • [5] Inverse design of programmable shape-morphing kirigami structures
    Ying, Xiaoyuan
    Fernando, Dilum
    Dias, Marcelo A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2025, 286
  • [6] Review of shape-morphing automobile structures: concepts and outlook
    Daynes, Stephen
    Weaver, Paul M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, 2013, 227 (11) : 1603 - 1622
  • [7] Nonlinear vibrations of shape-morphing cantilever plates: modeling and analysis
    Gulsacan, Burak
    Reiner, David
    Murphy, Cory
    Aureli, Matteo
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (28): : 240 - 245
  • [8] Inverse Design of Two-Dimensional Shape-Morphing Structures
    Abu-Mualla, Mohammad
    Jiron, Victor
    Huang, Jida
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2023, 145 (12)
  • [9] INVERSE DESIGN OF 2D SHAPE-MORPHING STRUCTURES
    Abu-Mualla, Mohammad
    Jiron, Victor
    Huang, Jida
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2023, VOL 2, 2023,
  • [10] Developing Complex Shape-Morphing Metallic Structures for Space Applications
    McCue, Ian D.
    Lennon, Andrew M.
    Seker, Drew P.
    Hebert, Chuck
    Mastandrea, James P.
    Peitsch, Christopher M.
    Montalbano, Timothy J.
    Mooers, Cavin T.
    Sopcisak, Joseph
    Carter, Ryan H.
    Szczesniak, Steve
    Trexler, Morgana M.
    Storck, Steven M.
    Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (Applied Physics Laboratory), 2021, 35 (04): : 404 - 408