Principles for Architecting Adaptable Command and Control Systems

被引:1
|
作者
Pitsko, Robert [1 ]
Verma, Dinesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Stevens Inst Technol, Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA
来源
CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH | 2012年 / 8卷
关键词
Principles; Adaptability; Architecture; Design; Command and Control; C2;
D O I
10.1016/j.procs.2012.01.029
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Command and Control (C2) systems are complex and require large capital investments, asynchronous design and test periods for different elements, and long deployment lifecycles of substituent elements. During the deployment, or evolution, of a C2 system, the larger operational context is likely to change. This has been observed to force costly and often suboptimal architectural changes at run-time as the C2 system struggles to adapt. Adaptability has been defined as a system's ability to change itself in response to changing environments; unfortunately, not all changes will be positive. It remains conceivable that some instances of adaptation can lead to sub-optimization or even global failures. These failures need be minimized. Traditional C2 systems design attempts to minimize these risks through highly detailed design specifications, rules, and testing requirements. Unfortunately, such methods may not enable an adaptive architecture. A principles based approach, consisting of a relatively small set of strategic outcome oriented concepts, could serve to guide the development of an adaptable C2 architecture while simultaneously minimizing the corresponding risk to the C2 system. This paper proposes and examines a set of principles for architecting adaptable systems and offers areas for further research. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 140
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robustness of decentralized decision-making architectures in command and control systems
    Boss, Lewis N.
    Gralla, Erica L.
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2023, 26 (02) : 149 - 161
  • [22] Orthogonal Array Experiment in Systems Engineering and Architecting
    Huynh, Thomas V.
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2011, 14 (02) : 208 - 222
  • [23] Computational framework for interactive architecting of complex systems
    Guenov, Marin D.
    Riaz, Atif
    Bile, Yogesh H.
    Molina-Cristobal, Arturo
    Van Heerden, Albert S. J.
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2020, 23 (03) : 350 - 365
  • [24] Architecting families of software systems with process algebras
    Bernardo, M
    Ciancarini, P
    Donatiello, L
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND METHODOLOGY, 2002, 11 (04) : 386 - 426
  • [25] Middleware Building Blocks for Architecting RFID Systems
    Kefalakis, Nikos
    Leontiadis, Nektarios
    Soldatos, John
    Donsez, Didier
    MOBILE LIGHTWEIGHT WIRELESS SYSTEMS, 2009, 13 : 325 - +
  • [26] Models of command and control
    Stanton, Neville A.
    Walker, Guy
    Jenkins, Dan
    Salmon, Paul
    Young, Mark
    Aujla, Amerdeep
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4562 : 600 - +
  • [27] Smart Adaptable Assembly Systems
    ElMaraghy, H.
    ElMaraghy, W.
    6TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS (CATS), 2016, 44 : 4 - 13
  • [28] Adaptable buildings: A systems approach
    Gosling, Jonathan
    Sassi, Paola
    Naim, Mohamed
    Lark, Robert
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2013, 7 : 44 - 51
  • [29] Three Strategies for Functional Architecting: Cases from the Health Systems of Developing Countries
    Nielsen, Petter
    Saebo, Johan Ivar
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 22 (01) : 134 - 151
  • [30] Architecting Dependable Systems with Proactive Fault Management
    Salfner, Felix
    Malek, Miroslaw
    ARCHITECTING DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS VII, 2010, 6420 : 171 - 200