Comparison of shockwave frequencies of 30 and 60 shocks per minute for kidney stones: a prospective randomized study

被引:2
|
作者
Altok, Muammer [1 ]
Gunes, Mustafa [1 ]
Umul, Mehmet [1 ]
Sahin, Ali Feyzullah [2 ]
Bas, Ercan [1 ]
Oksay, Taylan [1 ]
Soyupek, Sedat [1 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, TR-32260 Isparta, Turkey
[2] Sifa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Frequency; kidney; lithotripsy; pain; stone; WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; UROLITHIASIS TREATMENT; FRAGMENTATION; DELIVERY; SLOW; METAANALYSIS; AMPLITUDE; MODEL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2016.1235609
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: One of the factors that determines the treatment success of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the frequency of the shockwaves during the procedure. This study compared the efficacy and pain perception of shockwave frequencies at 30 versus 60 shocks/min for kidney stones. Materials and methods: From August 2013 to May 2015, 160 patients with solitary, radiopaque kidney stones were randomized to SWL at 30 shocks/min (group 1) or 60 shocks/min (group 2), with 80 patients in each group. The primary outcome measure was success rate at 3 months after the last SWL session. The secondary outcome measure was pain perception during the procedures. Results: Of the 160 randomized patients, data for a total of 148 patients (74 patients in group 1 and 74 patients in group 2) were analyzed, after the exclusion of the patients lost to follow-up or who required secondary intervention within 3 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the success rate at 3 months (68.9% vs 71.6%, p = .719). However, the mean visual analogue scale scores of all the sessions were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (5.83 vs 4.06, p <. 05). Stone location, especially the lower calyceal location, was the only significant negative predictor for success according to multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: The success rate was similar between these two frequencies. However, pain perception was significantly higher at 30 than at 60 shocks/min.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 482
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones
    Kandemir, Abdulkadir
    Guven, Selcuk
    Balasar, Mehmet
    Sonmez, Mehmet Giray
    Taskapu, Hakan
    Gurbuz, Recai
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (11) : 1771 - 1776
  • [22] Comparison of treatment outcomes according to output voltage during shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized multicenter study
    Jinsung Park
    Hong-Wook Kim
    Sungwoo Hong
    Hee Jo Yang
    Hong Chung
    World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 : 609 - 615
  • [23] Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study
    Vilches, R. M.
    Aliaga, A.
    Reyes, D.
    Sepulveda, F.
    Mercado, A.
    Moya, F.
    Ledezma, R.
    Hidalgo, J. P.
    Olmedo, T.
    Marchant, F.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2015, 39 (04): : 236 - 242
  • [24] A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study
    Nihat Karakoyunlu
    Goksel Goktug
    Nevzat Can Şener
    Kursad Zengin
    Ismail Nalbant
    Ufuk Ozturk
    Ugur Ozok
    Abdurrahim Imamoglu
    Urolithiasis, 2015, 43 : 283 - 287
  • [25] Is Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy the Modality of Choice Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for a 20 to 30 mm Single Renal Pelvic Stone with ≤1000 Hounsfield Unit in Adults? A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
    Gadelkareem, Rabea Ahmed
    Abdelsalam, Yaser Mahmoud
    Ibraheim, Mohammed Abdelsalam
    Reda, Ahmed
    Sayed, Mohamed Abdel-Basir
    El-Azab, Ahmed Shehata
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (11) : 1141 - 1148
  • [26] Comparison of reusable and single-use ureteroscopes for the treatment of medium-sized stones in the lower calyx: A prospective randomized study
    Salman, Mehmet Yilmaz
    Bayar, Goksel
    Dincer, Hakan Remzi
    Sinanoglu, Orhun
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (07): : 770 - 774
  • [27] Flexible ureterorenoscopy (RIRS) vs. Mini- percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MINI-PCNL) for renal stones 20–30 mm a prospective randomized study
    Ahmed Sebaey
    Ahmed Abou Taleb
    Salah Elbashir
    Rabie Gomaa
    Ali Elshazli
    Wael Saber
    African Journal of Urology, 2022, 28
  • [28] Flexible ureterorenoscopy (RIRS) vs. Mini- percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MINI-PCNL) for renal stones 20-30 mm a prospective randomized study
    Sebaey, Ahmed
    Abou Taleb, Ahmed
    Elbashir, Salah
    Gomaa, Rabie
    Elshazli, Ali
    Saber, Wael
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 28 (01)
  • [29] Comparison of an Indwelling Period Following Ureteroscopic Removal of Stones between Double-J Stents and Open-Ended Catheters: A Prospective, Pilot, Randomized, Multicenter Study
    Moon, Kyong Tae
    Cho, Hee Ju
    Cho, Jeong Man
    Kang, Jeong Yoon
    Yoo, Tag Keun
    Moon, Hong Sang
    Lee, Seung Wook
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 52 (10) : 698 - 702