Comparison of shockwave frequencies of 30 and 60 shocks per minute for kidney stones: a prospective randomized study

被引:2
作者
Altok, Muammer [1 ]
Gunes, Mustafa [1 ]
Umul, Mehmet [1 ]
Sahin, Ali Feyzullah [2 ]
Bas, Ercan [1 ]
Oksay, Taylan [1 ]
Soyupek, Sedat [1 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, TR-32260 Isparta, Turkey
[2] Sifa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Frequency; kidney; lithotripsy; pain; stone; WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; UROLITHIASIS TREATMENT; FRAGMENTATION; DELIVERY; SLOW; METAANALYSIS; AMPLITUDE; MODEL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2016.1235609
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: One of the factors that determines the treatment success of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the frequency of the shockwaves during the procedure. This study compared the efficacy and pain perception of shockwave frequencies at 30 versus 60 shocks/min for kidney stones. Materials and methods: From August 2013 to May 2015, 160 patients with solitary, radiopaque kidney stones were randomized to SWL at 30 shocks/min (group 1) or 60 shocks/min (group 2), with 80 patients in each group. The primary outcome measure was success rate at 3 months after the last SWL session. The secondary outcome measure was pain perception during the procedures. Results: Of the 160 randomized patients, data for a total of 148 patients (74 patients in group 1 and 74 patients in group 2) were analyzed, after the exclusion of the patients lost to follow-up or who required secondary intervention within 3 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the success rate at 3 months (68.9% vs 71.6%, p = .719). However, the mean visual analogue scale scores of all the sessions were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (5.83 vs 4.06, p <. 05). Stone location, especially the lower calyceal location, was the only significant negative predictor for success according to multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: The success rate was similar between these two frequencies. However, pain perception was significantly higher at 30 than at 60 shocks/min.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 482
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones [J].
Al-Ansari, Abdulla ;
As-Sadiq, Khalid ;
Al-Said, Sami ;
Younis, Nagy ;
Jaleel, Osama A. ;
Shokeir, Ahmed A. .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 38 (01) :63-67
[2]  
Azat C, 2010, BRATISL MED J, V111, P644
[3]   Best Practices in Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Comparison of Regional Practice Patterns [J].
Brown, Robert D. ;
De, Shubha ;
Sarkissian, Carl ;
Monga, Manoj .
UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (05) :1060-1064
[4]  
CHAUSSY C, 1980, LANCET, V2, P1265
[5]   THE INFLUENCE OF FLUID PROPERTIES AND PULSE AMPLITUDE ON BUBBLE DYNAMICS IN THE FIELD OF A SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPTER [J].
CHOI, MJ ;
COLEMAN, AJ ;
SAUNDERS, JE .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (11) :1561-1573
[6]   Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi [J].
Davenport, Kim ;
Minervini, Andrea ;
Keoghane, Stephen ;
Parkin, John ;
Keeley, Francis X. ;
Timoney, Anthony G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (05) :2055-2058
[7]   BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SHOCK-WAVES - KIDNEY DAMAGE BY SHOCK-WAVES IN DOGS - DOSE DEPENDENCE [J].
DELIUS, M ;
ENDERS, G ;
XUAN, ZR ;
LIEBICH, HG ;
BRENDEL, W .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1988, 14 (02) :117-122
[8]   Does the rate of extracorporeal shock wave delivery affect stone fragmentation? [J].
Greenstein, A ;
Matzkin, H .
UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (03) :430-432
[9]   Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter [J].
Huber, P ;
Jochle, K ;
Debus, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (10) :3113-3128
[10]   Improvement of stone comminution by slow delivery rate of shock waves in extracorporeal lithotripsy [J].
Kato, Yuji ;
Yamaguchi, Satoshi ;
Hori, Junichi ;
Okuyama, Mitsuhiko ;
Kakizaki, Hidehiro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 13 (12) :1461-1465