Comparison of shockwave frequencies of 30 and 60 shocks per minute for kidney stones: a prospective randomized study

被引:2
|
作者
Altok, Muammer [1 ]
Gunes, Mustafa [1 ]
Umul, Mehmet [1 ]
Sahin, Ali Feyzullah [2 ]
Bas, Ercan [1 ]
Oksay, Taylan [1 ]
Soyupek, Sedat [1 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, TR-32260 Isparta, Turkey
[2] Sifa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Frequency; kidney; lithotripsy; pain; stone; WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; UROLITHIASIS TREATMENT; FRAGMENTATION; DELIVERY; SLOW; METAANALYSIS; AMPLITUDE; MODEL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2016.1235609
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: One of the factors that determines the treatment success of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the frequency of the shockwaves during the procedure. This study compared the efficacy and pain perception of shockwave frequencies at 30 versus 60 shocks/min for kidney stones. Materials and methods: From August 2013 to May 2015, 160 patients with solitary, radiopaque kidney stones were randomized to SWL at 30 shocks/min (group 1) or 60 shocks/min (group 2), with 80 patients in each group. The primary outcome measure was success rate at 3 months after the last SWL session. The secondary outcome measure was pain perception during the procedures. Results: Of the 160 randomized patients, data for a total of 148 patients (74 patients in group 1 and 74 patients in group 2) were analyzed, after the exclusion of the patients lost to follow-up or who required secondary intervention within 3 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the success rate at 3 months (68.9% vs 71.6%, p = .719). However, the mean visual analogue scale scores of all the sessions were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (5.83 vs 4.06, p <. 05). Stone location, especially the lower calyceal location, was the only significant negative predictor for success according to multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: The success rate was similar between these two frequencies. However, pain perception was significantly higher at 30 than at 60 shocks/min.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 482
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] A Prospective, Randomized Study of the Clinical Effects of Shock Wave Delivery for Unilateral Kidney Stones: 60 Versus 120 Shocks per Minute
    Ng, Chi-Fai
    Lo, Anthony K. Y.
    Lee, Kim W. M.
    Wong, K. T.
    Chung, Wai-yee
    Gohel, Danny
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (03) : 837 - 842
  • [2] A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Compare Shock Wave Frequencies of 60 and 120 Shocks per Minute for Upper Ureteral Stones
    Honey, R. J. D'A.
    Schuler, T. D.
    Ghiculete, D.
    Pace, K. T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (04) : 1418 - 1423
  • [3] Comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones
    Mazzucchi, Eduardo
    Brito, Artur H.
    Danilovic, Alexandre
    Ebaid, Gustavo X.
    Chedid Neto, Elias
    Franco de Azevedo, Jose Reinaldo
    Srougi, Miguel
    CLINICS, 2010, 65 (10) : 961 - 965
  • [4] Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: A randomized, double-blind trial
    Pace, KT
    Ghiculete, D
    Harju, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (02) : 595 - 599
  • [5] Re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones
    Ho, Christopher C. K.
    CLINICS, 2011, 66 (01) : 181 - 181
  • [6] Comparing 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock-wave lithotripsy of solitary renal calculi: A controlled randomized study
    Ali, Tamer A.
    Abdelaal, Mohamed A.
    Amin, Moamen M.
    Saif-Elnasr, Mohamed K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2021, 14 (03) : 160 - 165
  • [7] Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi
    Davenport, Kim
    Minervini, Andrea
    Keoghane, Stephen
    Parkin, John
    Keeley, Francis X.
    Timoney, Anthony G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (05) : 2055 - 2058
  • [8] Comparison of treatment outcomes according to output voltage during shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized multicenter study
    Park, Jinsung
    Kim, Hong-Wook
    Hong, Sungwoo
    Yang, Hee Jo
    Chung, Hong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (05) : 609 - 615
  • [9] Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study
    Sfoungaristos, Stavros
    Polimeros, Nikolaos
    Kavouras, Adamantios
    Perimenis, Petros
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 44 (03) : 731 - 737
  • [10] Does tamsulosin increase stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy of renal stones? A prospective, randomized controlled study
    Hussein, Mohamed M.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 44 (01): : 27 - 31