An Evaluation of Surgical Site Infections by Wound Classification System Using the ACS-NSQIP

被引:190
作者
Ortega, Gezzer [1 ]
Rhee, Daniel S. [1 ]
Papandria, Dominic J. [1 ]
Yang, Jessica [1 ]
Ibrahim, Andrew M. [1 ]
Shore, Andrew D. [1 ]
Makary, Martin A. [1 ]
Abdullah, Fizan [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Div Pediat Surg, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
wound classification; surgical site infection; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; surgical outcomes; PREVENTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.056
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Surgical wound classification has been the foundation for infectious risk assessment, perioperative protocol development, and surgical decision-making. The wound classification system categorizes all surgeries into: clean, clean/contaminated, contaminated, and dirty, with estimated postoperative rates of surgical site infection (SSI) being 1%-5%, 3%-11%, 10%-17%, and over 27%, respectively. The present study evaluates the associated rates of the SSI by wound classification using a large risk adjusted surgical patient database. Methods. A cross-sectional study was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset between 2005 and 2008. All surgical cases that specified a wound class were included in our analysis. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, preoperative risk factors, co-morbidities, and complication rates were compared across the different wound class categories. Surgical site infection rates for superficial, deep incisional, and organ/space infections were analyzed among the four wound classifications using multivariate logistic regression. Results. A total of 634,426 cases were analyzed. From this sample, 49.7% were classified as clean, 35.0% clean/contaminated, 8.56% contaminated, and 6.7% dirty. When stratifying by wound classification, the clean, clean/contaminated, contaminated, and dirty wound classifications had superficial SSI rates of 1.76%, 3.94%, 4.75%, and 5.16%, respectively. The rates of deep incisional infections were 0.54%, 0.86%, 1.31%, and 2.1%. The rates for organ/space infection were 0.28%, 1.87%, 2.55%, and 4.54%. Conclusion. Using ACS-NSQIP data, the present study demonstrates substantially lower rates of surgical site infections in the contaminated and dirty wound classifications than previously reported in the literature. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of negative-pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections after ileostomy closure in colorectal cancer patients: a prospective multicenter study
    Okuya, Koichi
    Takemasa, Ichiro
    Tsuruma, Tetsuhiro
    Noda, Ai
    Sasaki, Kenichi
    Ueki, Tomomi
    Mukaiya, Mitsuhiro
    Saito, Keita
    Okita, Kenji
    Nishidate, Toshihiko
    Akizuki, Emi
    Hamabe, Atsushi
    Ishii, Masayuki
    SURGERY TODAY, 2020, 50 (12) : 1687 - 1693
  • [42] Evaluation of the performance of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy
    Rivard, Colleen
    Nahum, Rebi
    Slagle, Elizabeth
    Duininck, Megan
    Vogel, Rachel Isaksson
    Teoh, Deanna
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 141 (02) : 281 - 286
  • [43] Outcomes of Non-curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP)
    Yunni Jeong
    Alyson L. Mahar
    Natalie G. Coburn
    Christopher J. Wallis
    Raj Satkunasivam
    Kaitlyn Beyfuss
    Paul J. Karanicolas
    Calvin H. L. Law
    Julie Hallet
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 3943 - 3949
  • [44] Femoral Hernias: Analysis of Preoperative Risk Factors and 30-Day Outcomes of Initial Groin Hernias Using ACS-NSQIP
    Halgas, Barret
    Viera, Jennifer
    Dilday, Joshua
    Bader, Julia
    Holt, Danielle
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2018, 84 (09) : 1455 - 1461
  • [45] Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern in Isolates of Postoperative Wound Infections and Bacteriology of Surgical Site Infections: a Cross Sectional Study
    Azhar, Osama
    Bashir, Jamshed
    Ghias, Nighat
    Farid, Javeria
    Khan, Raja Muhammad Adeel
    Zaman, Junaid
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 16 (01): : 642 - 644
  • [46] Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system
    Glenn, Owen J. J.
    Faux, Ian
    Pratschke, Kathryn M. M.
    Blacklock, Kelly L. Bowlt L.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2024, 53 (01) : 184 - 193
  • [47] Negative Pressure Wound Dressing Reduces Surgical Site Infections in Infants after Closed Abdominal Procedures: A Preliminary Report
    Zoeller, Christoph
    Yoshizawa, Emi
    Sethi, Mohammad V.
    Ure, Benno M.
    Kuebler, Joachim F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2019, 29 (04) : 384 - 387
  • [48] The Modified Five-Item Frailty Index to Predict Hand and Wrist Surgical Repair Postoperative Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis of 11 369 Patients
    Ibelli, Taylor J.
    Alerte, Eric
    Akhavan, Arya
    Liu, Helen
    Kuruvilla, Annet
    Katz, Abigail
    Etigunta, Suhas
    Taub, Peter J.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024, 19 (03): : 433 - 441
  • [49] Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gao, Junru
    Wang, Yunyun
    Song, Jingyu
    Li, Ze
    Ren, Jianan
    Wang, Peige
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (10) : 3980 - 3990
  • [50] ?Sandwich? wound dressing to reduce surgical site infections during sacrococcygeal surgery: A retrospective analysis
    Xu, Sirui
    Li, Song
    Yan, Fei
    Han, Shuang
    Lin, Shan
    Gu, Jiaao
    Yu, Zhange
    Shao, Tuo
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2021, 30 (02) : 267 - 270