A radiographic analysis of degenerative spondylolisthesis at the L4-5 level Clinical article

被引:25
作者
Anderson, D. Greg [1 ]
Limthongkul, Worawat
Sayadipour, Amirali
Kepler, Christopher K.
Harrop, James S. [2 ]
Maltenfort, Mitchell [2 ]
Vaccaro, Alexander R.
Hilibrand, Alan
Rihn, Jeffrey A.
Albert, Todd J.
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Rothman Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis; dynamic angulation; dynamic translation; osteophyte formation; LUMBAR DISC DEGENERATION; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SAGITTAL BALANCE; SPINE; ASSOCIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; DECOMPRESSION; OSTEOPHYTES; AGREEMENT; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3171/2011.10.SPINE11140
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) is common and has generally been characterized as a homogeneous disease entity in the literature and in clinical practice. Because disease variability has not been carefully characterized, stratification of treatment recommendations based on scientific evidence is currently lacking. In this study, the authors analyzed radiographic parameters of patients with LDS at the L4-5 level to better characterize this entity. Methods. Demographic data were collected from 304 patients (200 women and 104 men) with LDS at the L4-5 level. Plain radiographs including anteroposterior, lateral, and flexion-extension lateral radiographs were analyzed for disc height, segmental angulation, segmental translation, and osteophyte formation. Correlations were sought between the variables of age, sex, disc height, segmental angulation, segmental translation, and osteophyte formation. Results. The mean patient age was 63.8 years (range 40-86 years). The mean mid-disc height was 7 mm (range 0-14 mm) on the neutral lateral view. The mean angulation between the superior endplate of L-5 and the inferior endplate of L-4 was 6 degrees of lordosis (range 13 degrees of kyphosis to 23 degrees lordosis) on the neutral lateral view. The mean angular change between flexion and extension lateral radiographs was 5 degrees (range 0 degrees-17 degrees). The mean translation on the neutral lateral view was 6 mm (range 0-15 mm). The mean change in translational between flexion and extension was 2 mm (range 0-11 mm). Twenty patients (7%) exhibited spondylolisthesis only on the flexion view. A significant positive correlation was found between the change in angulation and the change in translation on flexion and extension views (rho = 0.18, p = 0.001). No significant correlation was found between anterior osteophyte size and mobility with flexion-extension radiographs. Conclusions. The wide range in all radiographic parameters for LDS confirms the heterogeneous nature of this condition and suggests that a grading system to subclassify LDS may be clinically useful. On flexion and extension radiographs, increased translational motion correlated with increased angular motion. Anterior osteophyte size was not found to be predictive of segmental stability. This data set should prove beneficial to those seeking to subcategorize LDS in the future. (DOI: 10.3171/2011.10.SPINE11140)
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 134
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and radiographic analysis of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with sagittal imbalance
    Min-soo Cho
    Eun-Min Seo
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 2181 - 2189
  • [32] Low grade lytic spondylolisthesis L4/L5 treated with PLIF
    Schwarzenbach, Othmar
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (03) : 506 - 507
  • [33] Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kuo, Chao-Hung
    Huang, Wen-Cheng
    Wu, Jau-Ching
    Tu, Tsung-Hsi
    Fay, Li-Yu
    Wu, Ching-Lan
    Cheng, Henrich
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 29 (03) : 250 - 258
  • [34] Smaller facet effusion in association with restabilization at the time of operation in Japanese patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis Clinical article
    Oishi, Yosuke
    Murase, Masaaki
    Hayashi, Yoshihiro
    Ogawa, Takayuki
    Hamawaki, Jun-ichi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 12 (01) : 88 - 95
  • [35] Which Approach Is Advantageous to Preventing Development of Adjacent Segment Disease? Comparative Analysis of 3 Different Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques (ALIF, LLIF, and PLIF) in L4-5 Spondylolisthesis
    Lee, Chul-Woo
    Yoon, Kang-Jun
    Ha, Sang-Soo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 105 : 612 - 622
  • [36] Short-term and mid-term evaluation of three types of minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Song, Zhaojun
    Zhang, Zhi
    Zheng, Jiazhuang
    Zhang, Kai
    Wang, Fandong
    Ran, Maobo
    Luo, Juan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [37] Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up
    Kuo, Chao-Hung
    Chang, Peng-Yuan
    Wu, Jau-Ching
    Chang, Hsuan-Kan
    Fay, Li-Yu
    Tu, Tsung-Hsi
    Cheng, Henrich
    Huang, Wen-Cheng
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2016, 40 (01)
  • [38] Particularities of anterior fusion in L4-L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis
    Moreau, P. -E.
    Flouzat-Lachaniette, C. -H.
    Lebhar, J.
    Mirouse, G.
    Poignard, A.
    Allain, J.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (06) : 755 - 758
  • [39] Single-level TLIF Versus LLIF at L4-5: A Comparison of Patient-reported Outcomes and Recovery Ratios
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Ribot, Max A.
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (04) : E495 - E505
  • [40] Imaging analysis and predictive nomogram construction for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with severe clinical symptom based on propensity score matching
    He, Yi
    Wang, Wei
    Zhou, Haiting
    Huang, Xiaojian
    Wang, Yinguang
    Qu, Yunkun
    Cheng, Hao
    You, Hongbo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)