Imperialism and nationalism The nature of Russian aggression in Ukraine

被引:4
|
作者
Rojek, Pawel [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Philosophy, Grodzka 52, PL-33332 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Russian politics; War in Ukraine; Russian ideologies; Nationalism; Imperialism; Postimperialism; Neoimperialism; Pan-Slavism;
D O I
10.1007/s11212-022-09501-1
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Is Russia a neoimperial or postimperial state? In this paper, I compare two interpretations proposed by political commentators Marcel Van Herpen and Dmitri Trenin. Van Herpen holds that the Russian empire is literally being rebuilt, whereas Trenin believes that Russia is just ceasing to be an empire. I argue that, contrary to popular belief, the current war against Ukraine cannot be interpreted as an attempt to restore the Russian empire. This is because being an empire requires a universalistic ideology that can be accepted by other nations. Meanwhile, the ideological foundation of the current war is an obviously nationalistic conception of the "Russian world." Polish historians Andrzej Nowak and Wlodzimierz Marciniak brilliantly argued that it was Russian nationalism that had previously led to the collapse of both Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union. Under this interpretation the current war in Ukraine can be seen not as the rebirth but rather as the dramatic end of Russian imperialism.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 461
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条