What are the predictive factors leading to ureteral obstruction following endoscopic correction of VUR in the pediatric population?

被引:18
作者
Chertin, B. [1 ]
Mele, E. [2 ]
Kocherov, S. [1 ]
Zilber, S. [3 ]
Nappo, S. Gerocarni [2 ]
Capozza, N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Med, Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Pediat Urol, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Bambino Gesu Pediat Hosp, Pediat Urol Unit, Rome, Italy
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Med, Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
Endoscopic correction; Obstruction; Vantris; Histological evaluation; DEXTRANOMER/HYALURONIC ACID COPOLYMER; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX; SUBURETERAL INJECTION; MULTICENTER SURVEY; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.021
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background It is extremely important to not only address the short-term success following endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) but also the long-term efficacy and safety of the tissue augmenting substance utilized for endoscopic correction. Objective This study retrospectively evaluated all cases of ureterovesical junction (UVJ) obstruction following endoscopic treatment of VUR over the last 5 years utilizing two tissue augmenting substances, with special emphasis on the safety of Vantris (R), and performed clinical and histological review of these patients. Methods The study population comprised 2495 patients who underwent endoscopic correction of VUR utilizing Deflux (R) (1790) and Vantris (R) (705). Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin & eosin and trichrome, and examined under a light microscope. Nine primary obstructive megaureters after ureteral reimplantation served as controls. Results Nine (0.5%) children (three female and six male) in the Deflux group and nine (1.3%) (five females and four males) in the Vantris group developed UVJ obstruction and required ureteral re-implantation. Obstruction developed during the period ranging 2-49 months (average 16 months) following endoscopic correction. The primary reflux grade was III in seven, IV in six, and V in six children. The mean volume of the injected material in all obstructed patients was 1.2 +/- 0.6 cc (mean +/- SD). Histopathological analysis revealed a pseudocapsule composed of fibrous tissue and foreign-body giant cells surrounding the Vantris implant in all patients. The distal part of the ureters demonstrated significant ureteral dilatation without ureteral fibrosis. In all patients, additional biopsies from the muscularis propria adjacent to the injection site were examined and showed no significant abnormalities. There was an increased collagen deposition in the juxtavesical segment of the obstructive ureters following Deflux and Vantris injections, and of primary obstructive megaureter. No significant difference was found in the tissue response between Deflux and Vantris patients and controls. Statistical analysis of the nonhomogeneous population demonstrated higher obstruction rates in patients from the Vantris group. However, no statistical difference was demonstrated regarding the obstruction rate in the homogenous group with relation to gender, age and reflux grade group of patients. Moreover, univariate analysis revealed that Grade V reflux, the presence of beak sign on the reviewed pretreatment, and inflamed bladder mucosa upon injection were significant independent risk factors leading to obstruction. Discussion This study suggested that the underlining ureteral pathology lead to UVJ obstruction following Vantris injection. There was increased collagen deposition in the juxtavesical segment of the obstructive ureters following Vantris injection. Furthermore, these findings were similar to those discovered in patients who underwent endoscopic correction with Deflux, and in patients who required ureteral reimplantation due to primary obstructive megaureter. Additional biopsies from the muscularis propria adjacent to the injection site showed no significant abnormalities, ironing out the fact that Vantris did not led to adverse tissue reaction following injection. Univariate analysis further ironed out the hypothesis that underlying ureteral pathology was responsible for the increased incidence of UVJ obstruction and demonstrated that Grade V reflux, the presence of beak sign on the reviewed pretreatment VCUG, and inflamed bladder mucosa upon injection were significant independent risk factors leading to obstruction. Conclusion Data showed that Vantris injection did not lead to any different ureteral fibrosis or inflammatory changes to the tissue augmenting substances utilized in past and present clinical practice, and therefore did not seem to increase the incidence of UVJ obstruction. High reflux grade, presence of obstructive/refluxing megaureter and inflamed bladder mucosa were the only statistically significant and independent predictive factors for UVJ obstruction following endoscopic correction of VUR.
引用
收藏
页码:538.e1 / 538.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Relative contraindication to endoscopic subureteral injection for vesicoureteral reflux: Congenital refluxing megaureter with distal aperistaltic segment
    Aaronson, David S.
    Siddiqui, Sarneer A.
    Reinberg, Yuri
    Baskin, Lauvence S.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (04) : 616 - 619
  • [2] Postoperative ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (Vantris®)
    Alizadeh, Farshid
    Mazdak, Hamid
    Khorrami, Mohammad H.
    Khalighinejad, Pooyan
    Shoureshi, Pourya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2013, 9 (04) : 488 - 492
  • [3] Asymptomatic chronic partial obstruction of a normal ureter following dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux®) injection for grade I vesicoureteral reflux
    Arlen, Angela M.
    Pakalniskis, Brittany L.
    Cooper, Christopher S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2012, 8 (03) : E27 - E30
  • [4] The role of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux: A 17-year experience
    Capozza, N
    Lais, A
    Nappo, S
    Caione, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (04) : 1626 - 1628
  • [5] Endoscopic treatment of primary grades IV and V vesicoureteral reflux in children with subureteral injection of polytetrafluoroethylene
    Chertin, B
    De Caluwé, D
    Puri, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (05) : 1847 - 1849
  • [6] Preliminary data on endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (Vantris®): Surgical outcome following single injection
    Chertin, Boris
    Abu Arafeh, Wael
    Zeldin, Alexander
    Kocherov, Stanislav
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2011, 7 (06) : 654 - 657
  • [7] Long-term results of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux with different tissue-augmenting substances
    Chertin, Boris
    Kocherov, Stanislav
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2010, 6 (03) : 251 - 256
  • [8] Acute and delayed vesicoureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer: Why and how to manage
    Garcia-Aparicio, L.
    Rodo, J.
    Palazon, P.
    Martin, O.
    Blazquez-Gomez, E.
    Manzanares, A.
    Garcia-Smith, N.
    Bejarano, M.
    de Haro, I.
    Ribo, J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2013, 9 (04) : 493 - 497
  • [9] FUNCTIONAL OBSTRUCTION OF URETER AND RENAL PELVIS - HISTOLOGICAL AND ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC STUDY
    GOSLING, JA
    DIXON, JS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1978, 50 (03): : 145 - 152
  • [10] GRIFFITHS D J, 1989, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, V111, P206, DOI 10.1115/1.3168367