Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma

被引:106
作者
Kroepil, Patric [1 ]
Fenk, Roland [1 ]
Fritz, Lars B. [1 ]
Blondin, Dirk [1 ]
Kobbe, Guido [1 ]
Moedder, Ulrich [1 ]
Cohnen, Mathias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Diagnost Radiol, Klin Hamatol Onkol & Klin Immunol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
multiple myeloma; MDCT; whole-body scan; low-dose CT; osteolysis;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-007-0738-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study compares the sensitivity of whole-body multidetector CT (MDCT) and conventional radiography (CR) in the staging of multiple myeloma (MM). Twentynine patients with MM underwent a staging examination both by MDCT and CR. CT examination was performed with a collimation of 644.6 mm, a tube potential of 100 kVp, an effective tube current-time product of 100 mAs and automatic dose modulation as low-dose protocol. Number, size and diagnostic confidence of osteolytic lesions were determined and compared. The effective dose of MDCT and CR was assessed. Using MDCT, the detection of osteolysis was increased seven-fold concerning the spine. Ninety-seven lesions in 18 patients were detected exclusively by MDCT. The detection rate concerning the spine, pelvic skeleton and thoracic cage was significantly higher (p<0.001), and diagnostic confidence was increased by MDCT (p<0.02) compared to CR. Therapy was changed after MDCT in 18.2% of the patients with a clinical suspicion of progressive disease. The estimated effective dose of MDCT (4.8 mSv) and CR (1.7 mSv) was comparable. In conclusion, MDCT has a significantly higher sensitivity and reliability in the detection of osteolysis than CR and can be recommended as standard imaging method in the staging of MM.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Automatic tube-current modulation in CT -: A comparison between different solutions [J].
Althén, JN .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :308-312
[2]  
Baur-Melnyk A, 2004, RADIOLOGE, V44, P874, DOI 10.1007/s00117-004-1103-z
[3]   Diagnosis, prognosis, and standard treatment of multiple myeloma [J].
Boccadoro, M ;
Pileri, A .
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 11 (01) :111-&
[4]   Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Poll, LW ;
Puettmann, C ;
Ewen, K ;
Saleh, A ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) :1148-1153
[5]   Multislice helical CT (MSCT) for mid-facial trauma: Optimization of parameters for scanning and reconstruction [J].
Dammert, S ;
Funke, M ;
Merten, HA ;
Obernauer, S ;
Grabbe, E .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2002, 174 (07) :874-879
[6]  
DURIE BGM, 1986, SEMIN ONCOL, V13, P300
[7]  
DURIE BGM, 1982, CLIN HAEMATOL, V11, P181
[8]  
DURIE BGM, 1975, CANCER, V36, P842, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197509)36:3<842::AID-CNCR2820360303>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-U
[10]  
Durie Brian G M, 2003, Hematol J, V4, P379