Environmental life cycle assessment of a small hydropower plant in China

被引:60
作者
Pang, Mingyue [1 ]
Zhang, Lixiao [1 ]
Wang, Changbo [1 ]
Liu, Gengyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; Environmental impacts; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Small hydropower; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; EMERGY ANALYSIS; ENERGY; GENERATION; WIND; INVENTORY; REDUCTION; SYSTEMS; POWER;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-015-0878-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Small hydropower (SHP) in China has experienced soring development in the past two decades and has been assigned ambitious development goals recently, while its environmental performance remains unclear. This study is intended to provide a comprehensive assessment of the environmental impacts of SHP plants in China, to compare the results with its counterparts in other countries, and to identify the key factors in the mitigation of negative consequences. A life cycle assessment of a SHP plant in Guizhou Province of China was conducted in a cradle-to-grave manner following the ISO 14040 guidelines. The functional unit is defined as 1 MWh of net electricity produced by the plant. The CML 2001 method was applied to characterize the environmental impacts. The environmental impact categories considered in this study included global warming (GWP), abiotic depletion (ADP), acidification (AP), freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity (FAETP), human toxicity (HTP), and photochemical ozone creation (POCP). Further contribution analyses and sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the key contributors to each impact category during the life cycle of the plant. For the case plant, the considered impacts are caused primarily by the construction stage. As for the materials and energy inputs, cement, steel, and electricity are the three dominating ones for the overall environmental impacts. Compared with SHP plants in other countries, the plant performs similar to the MW scale plants in Thailand and Japan but worse than the plant in Switzerland. Further comparison of life cycle inventories (LCIs) revealed that the quality of hydro-energy resources and acquisition of indigenous equipment technology is essential to their environmental performance. The results of the sensitivity analysis suggested that the amount of construction materials and energy consumption as well as the plant output influences its environmental performance significantly. The construction stage of the SHP plant is the most important source of environmental impacts. To minimize the impacts of this stage, optimization of the structural design and application of new construction materials and good construction practices is recommended. In addition, determining suitable installed capacity and advancing equipment technologies to ensure the optimal output is also crucial to improve the environmental performance of SHP plants in China, regarding the current serious problem of unstable operation.
引用
收藏
页码:796 / 806
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ILCD HDB INT REF LIF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[3]   Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an Italian wind farm [J].
Ardente, Fulvio ;
Beccali, Marco ;
Cellura, Maurizio ;
Lo Brano, Valeno .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2008, 12 (01) :200-217
[4]   Life cycle assessment of an offshore grid interconnecting wind farms and customers across the North Sea [J].
Arvesen, Anders ;
Nes, Rasmus Nikolai ;
Huertas-Hernando, Daniel ;
Hertwich, Edgar G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (04) :826-837
[5]   Life Cycle Assessment of Chinese Shrimp Farming Systems Targeted for Export and Domestic Sales [J].
Cao, Ling ;
Diana, James S. ;
Keoleian, Gregory A. ;
Lai, Qiuming .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (15) :6531-6538
[6]  
CWSY, 2012, CHIN WAT STAT YB 201
[7]   Benefit Evaluation on Energy Saving and Emission Reduction of National Small Hydropower Ecological Protection Project [J].
Ding Yi-fan ;
Tang De-shan ;
Wang Ting .
2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 :540-544
[8]   Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Utility-Scale Wind Power [J].
Dolan, Stacey L. ;
Heath, Garvin A. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 :S136-S154
[9]  
Dones R, 1996, IAEA ADV GROUP M ASS
[10]   Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Finnveden, Goran ;
Hauschild, Michael Z. ;
Ekvall, Tomas ;
Guinee, Jeroen ;
Heijungs, Reinout ;
Hellweg, Stefanie ;
Koehler, Annette ;
Pennington, David ;
Suh, Sangwon .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 91 (01) :1-21