Use of geopark resource values for a sustainable tourism: a case study from Turkey (Cittaslow Uzundere)

被引:22
作者
Ozgeris, Mustafa [1 ]
Karahan, Faris [2 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Tortum Vocat Coll, Landscape & Ornamental Plants Programme, TR-25430 Erzurum, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Univ, Architecture & Design Fac, Landscape Architecture Dept, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
Development; Geopark; Plannning; Sustainability; Tourism; GEOTOURISM; HERITAGE; GEOCONSERVATION; GEODIVERSITY; GEOHERITAGE; AREAS;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-020-00773-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Geoparks contain various resource values including geological, geomorphological, hydrographical values, edaphic, biological diversity, historical structures and traditional culture within themselves. The resource value of geoparks draw the attention of scientists and nature and adventure lovers. For this reason, geopark resource values constitute a significant potential for many touristic activities. Considering that this potential is planned in a sustainable manner, geopark resource values will be preserved and a contribution will be made to local and regional development as well. The study is carried out on 12 different locations in Uzundere, the 11th Cittaslow city in Turkey. The aim of the study is to evaluate the use of geopark resources for the development of sustainable tourism. Geotourism potential of the area is determined by SWOT (strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats) analysis with a focus group within the scope of the study. In addition to the SWOT analysis, the TOWS matrix is established and some basic strategies are included for sustainable tourism development. Moreover, geotourism and special interest routes are recommended for 12 locations containing various geopark resource values.
引用
收藏
页码:4270 / 4284
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   SWOT analysis revisited through PEAK-framework [J].
Al-Araki, Magid .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2013, 25 (03) :615-625
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MAK TOUR MOR SUST GU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ERZURUM DOA TURIZMI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, CLIO, V28, P5, DOI CLIO
[5]  
Antic A, 2017, Acta Geotur, V8, P67, DOI [10.1515/agta-2017-0007, DOI 10.1515/AGTA-2017-0007]
[6]  
Atalay, 1979, REVIEV GEOGRAPHICAL, V17, P49
[7]   Geotourism and Rural Tourism Synergy for Sustainable DevelopmentMarcik Valley CaseTunceli, Turkey [J].
Ates, Hacer Celik ;
Ates, Yusuf .
GEOHERITAGE, 2019, 11 (01) :207-215
[8]   Public Education in Heritage Conservation for Geopark Community [J].
Azman, Norzaini ;
Halim, Sharina Abdul ;
Liu, Ong Puay ;
Saidin, Salsela ;
Komoo, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNER DIVERSITY 2010, 2010, 7 :504-511
[9]   Definition of the Portuguese frameworks with international relevance as an input for the European geological heritage characterisation [J].
Brilha, J ;
Andrade, C ;
Azerêdo, A ;
Barriga, FJAS ;
Cachao, M ;
Couto, H ;
Cunha, PP ;
Crispim, JA ;
Dantas, P ;
Duarte, LV ;
Freitas, MC ;
Granja, HM ;
Henriques, MH ;
Henriques, R ;
Lopes, L ;
Madeira, J ;
Matos, JMX ;
Noronha, F ;
Pais, J ;
Piçarra, J ;
Ramalho, MM ;
Relvas, JMRS ;
Ribeiro, A ;
Santos, A ;
Santos, VF ;
Terrinha, P .
EPISODES, 2005, 28 (03) :177-186
[10]   Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: a Review [J].
Brilha, Jose .
GEOHERITAGE, 2016, 8 (02) :119-134