Screening immune adjuvants for an inactivated vaccine against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae

被引:5
|
作者
Guan, Li-Jun [1 ,2 ]
Pei, Shi-Xuan [1 ]
Song, Ji-Jian [1 ]
Zhan, Peng-Fei [1 ]
Han, Yi-Nong [1 ]
Xue, Yun [1 ]
Ding, Ke [1 ]
Zhao, Zhan-Qin [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Lab Vet Microbiol, Luoyang, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Coll Vet Med, Changchun, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae; swine; vaccine; adjuvant; protective efficacy; PARASUIS SEROVARS 4; PROTECTIVE EFFICACY; GLASSERS-DISEASE; STRAINS; ANTIGEN; SWINE; SEROTYPES; INFECTION; OUTBREAKS; SPAA;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2022.922867
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
In this study, we screened adjuvants for an inactivated vaccine against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (E. rhusiopathiae). Inactivated cells of E. rhusiopathiae strain HG-1 were prepared as the antigen in five adjuvanted inactivated vaccines, including a mineral-oil-adjuvanted vaccine (Oli vaccine), aluminum-hydroxide-gel-adjuvanted vaccine (Alh vaccine), ISA201-biphasic-oil-emulsion-adjuvanted vaccine (ISA201 vaccine), GEL02-water-soluble-polymer-adjuvanted vaccine (GEL vaccine), and IMS1313-water-soluble-nanoparticle-adjuvanted vaccine (IMS1313 vaccine). The safety test results of subcutaneous inoculation in mice showed that Oli vaccine had the most severe side effects, with a combined score of 35, followed by the ISA201 vaccine (25 points), Alh vaccine (20 points), GEL vaccine (10 points), and IMS1313 vaccine (10 points). A dose of 1.5LD(50) of strain HG-1 was used to challenge the mice intraperitoneally, 14 days after their second immunization. The protective efficacy of Oli vaccine and Alh vaccine was 100% (8/8), whereas that of the other three adjuvanted vaccines was 88% (7/8). Challenge with 2.5LD(50) of strain HG-1 resulted in a 100% survival rate, demonstrating the 100% protective efficacy of the Oli vaccine, followed by the GEL vaccine (71%, 5/7), IMS1313 vaccine (57%, 4/7), ISA201 vaccine (43%, 3/7), and Alh vaccine (29%, 2/7). Challenge with 4LD(50) of strain HG-1 showed 100% (7/7) protective efficacy of the Oli vaccine and 71% (5/7) protective efficacy of the GEL vaccine, whereas the protective efficacy of other three adjuvanted vaccine was 14% (1/7). The Alh and GEL vaccines were selected for comparative tests in piglets, and both caused minor side effects. A second immunization with these two adjuvanted vaccines conferred 60 and 100% protective efficacy, respectively, after the piglets were challenged via an ear vein with 8LD(100) of strain HG-1. After challenge with 16LD(100) of strain HG-1, the Alh and GEL vaccines showed 40% and 100% protective efficacy, respectively. Our results suggested that GEL is the optimal adjuvant for an inactivated vaccine against E. rhusiopathiae.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety of a live attenuated Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae vaccine for swine
    Neumann, Eric J.
    Grinberg, Alex
    Bonistalli, Kathryn N.
    Mack, Hamish J.
    Lehrbach, Philip R.
    Gibson, Nicole
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 135 (3-4) : 297 - 303
  • [2] Immunogenicity and Protection by DnaK and SpaA Recombinant Proteins Against Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae in a Murine Model
    Godoy, Naiane Lima
    de Moraes, Jonathan Ballico
    de Castro, Cynthia Aparecida
    Pedott Santana, Jhonne Pedro
    Zangirolami, Teresa Cristina
    da Silva, Adilson Jose
    Marques Novo-Mansur, Maria Teresa
    Anibal, Fernanda de Freitas
    CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 57 (05) : 379 - 394
  • [3] A field comparison study of two vaccine protocols against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae in two types of swine breeds in Spain
    Sanchez-Tarifa, E.
    Alonso, C.
    Perez, I.
    Garcia, L. A.
    Fernandez-Fontelo, A.
    Gomez-Duran, O.
    Garcia-Morante, B.
    Garcia-Vazquez, Francisco A.
    Hernandez-Caravaca, I.
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [4] Safety and long-lasting immunity of the combined administration of a modified-live virus vaccine against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 and an inactivated vaccine against porcine parvovirus and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae in breeding pigs
    Sanchez-Matamoros, Almudena
    Camprodon, Agusti
    Maldonado, Jaime
    Pedrazuela, Rafael
    Miranda, Joel
    PORCINE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2019, 5 (1)
  • [5] The Swine Erysipelas Vaccine SER-ME Effectively Protects Pigs against Challenge with the Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae M203/I257 SpaA-Type Variant
    Morimoto, Misako
    Kato, Atsushi
    Nogami, Kotoe
    Akaike, Yuta
    Furusawa, Takaaki
    Kojima, Hiroe
    Sasakawa, Chihiro
    VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2022, 9 (08)
  • [6] Protective effect of NaOH-extracted Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae vaccine in pigs
    Kitajima, T
    Oishi, E
    Amimoto, K
    Ui, S
    Nakamura, H
    Okada, N
    Sasaki, O
    Yasuhara, H
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 60 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [7] Evaluation of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae vaccines in pigs by intradermal challenge and immune responses
    Eamens, G. J.
    Chin, J. C.
    Turner, B.
    Barchia, I.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 116 (1-3) : 138 - 148
  • [8] Development of a duplex PCR for rapid detection and differentiation of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae vaccine strains and wild type strains
    Zhu, Weifeng
    Wu, Chao
    Kang, Chao
    Cai, Chengzhi
    Jin, Meilin
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 199 : 108 - 110
  • [9] Oral vaccination against mycoplasmal pneumonia of swine using a live Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae vaccine strain as a vector
    Ogawa, Yohsuke
    Oishi, Eiji
    Muneta, Yoshihiro
    Sano, Akiyuki
    Hikono, Hirokazu
    Shibahara, Tomoyuki
    Yagi, Yukio
    Shimoji, Yoshihiro
    VACCINE, 2009, 27 (33) : 4543 - 4550
  • [10] Induction of cross-protection in mice against dolphin Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae isolates with a swine commercial vaccine
    Lacave, G
    Cox, E
    Hermans, J
    Devriese, L
    Goddeeris, BM
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 80 (03) : 247 - 253