The rise and fall of a National Safety Promotion Programme - The case of Sweden
被引:1
|
作者:
Skjonberg, Guldbrand
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Linkoping Univ, Sect Social Med & Publ Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Hlth, Linkoping, SwedenLinkoping Univ, Sect Social Med & Publ Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Hlth, Linkoping, Sweden
Skjonberg, Guldbrand
[1
]
Svanstrom, Leif
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Karolinska Inst, Res Grp Hlth & Safety Promot, Div Social Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, S-11453 Stockholm, SwedenLinkoping Univ, Sect Social Med & Publ Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Hlth, Linkoping, Sweden
Svanstrom, Leif
[2
]
Schelp, Lothar
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Karolinska Inst, Res Grp Hlth & Safety Promot, Div Social Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, S-11453 Stockholm, SwedenLinkoping Univ, Sect Social Med & Publ Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Hlth, Linkoping, Sweden
Schelp, Lothar
[2
]
机构:
[1] Linkoping Univ, Sect Social Med & Publ Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Hlth, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Res Grp Hlth & Safety Promot, Div Social Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, S-11453 Stockholm, Sweden
national programme;
safe community;
cross-sector collaboration;
D O I:
10.1080/17457300.2010.542561
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
In 1982, when Sweden got a new Health Service Act, the health sector was given a new role - to collect, analyse and actively disseminate the knowledge it gained. A National Safety Promotion Programme was build up by the National Board for Health and Welfare, and a National Inter-sector Cooperation Group and medical advisory board were established. In 1992, the programme was transferred to the National Institute of Public Health. Later the Institute was given a new role and therefore the programme was relocated to the Swedish Rescue Service Agency. In some aspects we can see a parallel with the paradigm that was behind the Civil Protection Act 2003 and the Health Service Act 1982. It was a logic consequence to move the national programme to the rescue service sector. Within the National Rescue Service Agency the programme ended up in the line organisation, which lacked a cross-sector work orientation. The programme was closed down. In the article the reason for the decisions is described and also the background and the possibilities for the programme to act in different national boards as well as the preconditions for an inter-sector group.
机构:
Harvard Univ, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, Harvard, MA USA
Brigham Womens Hosp, Harvard, MA USAUniv Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, EHlth Res Grp, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
机构:
London Sch Econ, Ctr Philosophy Nat & Social Sci, London WC2A 2AE, EnglandLondon Sch Econ, Ctr Philosophy Nat & Social Sci, London WC2A 2AE, England
机构:
European Res Ctr Anticorrupt & State Bldg ERCAS, Berlin, Germany
Hertie Sch Governance, Berlin, GermanyEuropean Res Ctr Anticorrupt & State Bldg ERCAS, Berlin, Germany