Laparoscopic CBD exploration using a V-shaped choledochotomy

被引:14
作者
Kim, Eun Young [1 ]
Lee, Soo Ho [1 ]
Lee, Jun Suh [1 ]
Hong, Tae Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Seoul, South Korea
来源
BMC SURGERY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Choledocholithiasis; Cholelithiasis; Laparoscopy; BILE-DUCT STONES; CONCOMITANT GALLBLADDER STONES; MANAGEMENT; CHOLEDOCHOLITHOTOMY; 2-STAGE; STAGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-015-0050-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a treatment modality for choledocholithiasis. The advantages of this technique are that it is less invasive than conventional open surgery and it permits single-stage management; however, other technical difficulties limit its use. The aim of this article is to introduce our novel technique for LCBDE, which may overcome some of the limitations of conventional LCBDE. Since December 2013, ten patients have undergone LCBDE using a V-shaped choledochotomy (V-CBD). After the confluence of the cystic duct and the CBD were exposed, a V-shaped incision was made along the medial wall of the cystic duct and the lateral wall of the common hepatic duct, which comprise two sides of Calot's triangle. The choledochoscope was inserted into the lumen of the CBD through a V-shaped incision, and all CBD stones were retrieved using a basket or a Fogarty balloon catheter or were irrigated with saline. After CBD clearance was confirmed using the choledochoscope, the choledochotomy was closed with the bard absorbable suture material known as V-loc. Results: The diameter of the CBD ranged from 8 to 30 mm, and the mean size of the stones was 11.6 +/- 8.4 mm. The mean operative time was 97.8 +/- 30.3 min, and the mean length of the postoperative hospital stay was 6.0 +/- 4.6 days. All patients recovered without any postoperative complications, except for one patient who developed postoperative pancreatitis. No conversions to laparotomy were observed, and there were no recurrent stones and no need of T-tube insertion. Conclusions: This report suggests that our novel technique, known as V-CBD, may represent a feasible and straightforward procedure for treating choledocholithiasis, especially when the CBD is not dilated.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Bandyopadhyay Samik Kumar, 2007, J Minim Access Surg, V3, P19, DOI 10.4103/0972-9941.30682
[2]   ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF BILE-DUCT STONES - (APPLES AND ORANGES) [J].
COTTON, PB .
GUT, 1984, 25 (06) :587-597
[3]   EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi [J].
Cuschieri, A ;
Lezoche, E ;
Morino, M ;
Croce, E ;
Lacy, A ;
Toouli, J ;
Faggioni, A ;
Ribeiro, VM ;
Jakimowicz, J ;
Visa, J ;
Hanna, GB .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (10) :952-957
[4]   Laparoendoscopic Management of Concomitant Gallbladder Stones and Common Bile Duct Stones: What is the Best Technique? [J].
El-Geidie, Ahmed Abdel-Raouf .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2011, 21 (04) :282-287
[5]   Comparative Evaluation of Two Laparoscopic Procedures for Treating Common Bile Duct Stones [J].
Gu, Ai-dong ;
Li, Xiang-nong ;
Guo, Ke-xun ;
Ma, Zu-tai .
CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2011, 59 (03) :159-164
[6]   Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration [J].
Gurusamy, K. S. ;
Samraj, K. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (01)
[7]  
Huang SM, 2010, AM SURGEON, V76, P517
[8]  
Huang SM, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P407
[9]  
Lu J, 2013, AM SURGEON, V79, P1142
[10]   Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration After Unsuccessful Endoscopic Stone Removal [J].
Paik, Kwang Yeol ;
Kim, Eung Kook .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (02) :137-140