The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions

被引:162
作者
Kroner, DG [1 ]
Mills, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] Pittsburgh Inst, Kingston, ON K7L 5E5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1177/009385480102800405
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The predictive accuracy of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, Level of Service Inventory-Revised, HCR-20, Violence Risk Appraisal Guide, and the Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form were compared in a sample of male offenders. Both correlations and receiver operating characteristics measured the relationship between the instruments and the predictive outcome criteria of institutional misconduct and release failure. Although some instruments performed better across the outcome measures, there were no statistical differences in predictive accuracy among the instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 489
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[51]   PREDICTING THE DISCIPLINARY ADJUSTMENT OF MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM SECURITY PRISON-INMATES USING THE LIFE-STYLE CRIMINALITY SCREENING FORM [J].
WALTERS, GD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 1991, 35 (01) :63-71
[52]  
Webster C.D., 1995, The HCR-20 scheme: The assessment of dangerousness and risk
[53]   IS HARE PSYCHOPATHY CHECKLIST RELIABLE WITHOUT THE INTERVIEW [J].
WONG, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1988, 62 (03) :931-934