A Stackelberg game model for resource allocation in cargo container security

被引:22
作者
Bakir, Niyazi Onur [1 ]
机构
[1] Bilkent Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Container security; Port security; Border security; Game theory; Risk analysis; Terrorism;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-010-0793-z
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper presents a game theoretic model that analyzes resource allocation strategies against an adaptive adversary to secure cargo container transportation. The defender allocates security resources that could interdict an unauthorized weapon insertion inside a container. The attacker observes the defender's security strategy and chooses a site to insert the weapon. The attacker's goal is to maximize the probability that the weapon reaches its target. The basic model includes a single container route. The results in the basic model suggest that in equilibrium the defender should maintain an equal level of physical security at each site on the cargo container's route. Furthermore, the equilibrium levels of resources to interdict the weapon overseas increase as a function of the attacker's capability to detonate the weapon remotely at a domestic seaport. Investment in domestic seaport security is highly sensitive to the attacker's remote detonation capability as well. The general model that includes multiple container routes suggests that there is a trade-off between the security of foreign seaports and the physical security of sites including container transfer facilities, container yards, warehouses and truck rest areas. The defender has the flexibility to shift resources between non-intrusive inspections at foreign seaports and physical security of other sites on the container route. The equilibrium is also sensitive to the cost effectiveness of security investments.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 22
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ALLISON G, 2006, HARVARD INT REV, V28, P50
[2]  
Allison Graham., 2004, NUCL TERRORISM
[3]  
[Anonymous], ILL TRAFF OTH UN ACT
[4]  
[Anonymous], NAT PLANN SCEN EX SU
[5]  
Bakir N.O., 2008, Decision Analysis, V5, P230
[6]  
BAKSHI N, 2009, 20090501 WHART SCH R
[7]   Optimal resource allocation for defense of targets based on differing measures of attractiveness [J].
Bier, Vicki M. ;
Haphuriwat, Naraphorn ;
Menoyo, Jaime ;
Zimmerman, Rae ;
Culpen, Alison M. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2008, 28 (03) :763-770
[8]   Meeting the challenges of terrorism risk analysis [J].
Bier, Vicki M. ;
von Winterfeldt, Detlof .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (03) :503-504
[9]  
BOROS E, 2006, RRR262006
[10]   Terrorist nuclear weapon construction: How difficult? [J].
Bunn, Matthew ;
Wier, Anthony .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2006, 607 :133-149