Life cycle assessment (LCA) of urban water infrastructure: emerging approaches to balance objectives and inform comprehensive decision-making

被引:70
作者
Byrne, Diana M. [1 ]
Lohman, Hannah A. C. [1 ]
Cook, Sherri M. [2 ]
Peters, Gregory M. [3 ,4 ]
Guest, Jeremy S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Chalmers Univ Technol, Div Environm Syst Anal, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ New South Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MICROBIAL RISK-ASSESSMENT; INCLUDING PATHOGEN RISK; ARCHIVED US BIOSOLIDS; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; WASTE-WATER; SOCIAL ASPECTS; FATE FACTORS; FRESH-WATER; END-POINTS; PART;
D O I
10.1039/c7ew00175d
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been widely used to quantify environmental impacts associated with urban water infrastructure, including wastewater, drinking water, stormwater, and integrated urban water systems. While LCA is applicable for the estimation of global environmental impacts, decision-makers must balance these impacts with local, often regulated, environmental and public health objectives. To characterize the state of the art for the use of LCA for urban water infrastructure, a thorough literature review was conducted of papers that applied LCA to wastewater (173 papers), drinking water (44 papers), stormwater (17 papers), and integrated urban water (22 papers) systems. Analyses revealed current preferences for functional unit basis (e.g., volume for wastewater), system boundaries (e.g., focus on operation), and impact assessment methodology (CML, ReCiPe, and Eco-Indicator). Based on these findings, LCA methodological recommendations for urban water infrastructure are made, and emerging opportunities to balance objectives and inform comprehensive decision-making are discussed. Critical opportunities include the integration of spatial considerations (e.g., spatialized characterization factors), water quantity (e.g., water quantity indicators), public health (e.g., integration with risk assessment), economic and social assessments (e.g., life cycle costing and social LCA), along with prioritization of continuous stakeholder engagement. Finally, research and development needs specific to the use of LCA for urban water infrastructure (e.g., development of new indicators coupled with case studies) are prioritized.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1014
页数:13
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [1] Environmental and economic sustainability of ion exchange drinking water treatment for organics removal
    Amini, Adib
    Kim, Youngwoon
    Zhang, Jie
    Boyer, Treavor
    Zhang, Qiong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 104 : 413 - 421
  • [2] [Anonymous], WHAT GREEN INFR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, METHODOLOGICAL SHEET
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
  • [5] Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) for Environmental Development and Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance
    Ashbolt, Nicholas J.
    Amezquita, Alejandro
    Backhaus, Thomas
    Borriello, Peter
    Brandt, Kristian K.
    Collignon, Peter
    Coors, Anja
    Finley, Rita
    Gaze, William H.
    Heberer, Thomas
    Lawrence, John R.
    Larsson, D. G. Joakim
    McEwen, Scott A.
    Ryan, James J.
    Schoenfeld, Jens
    Silley, Peter
    Snape, Jason R.
    Van den Eede, Christel
    Topp, Edward
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 121 (09) : 993 - 1001
  • [6] Assessing the Importance of Spatial Variability versus Model Choices in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: The Case of Freshwater Eutrophication in Europe
    Azevedo, Ligia B.
    Henderson, Andrew D.
    van Zelm, Rosalie
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (23) : 13565 - 13570
  • [7] TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0
    Bare, Jane
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2011, 13 (05) : 687 - 696
  • [8] Life Cycle Impact Assessment Workshop Summary Midpoints versus Endpoints: The Sacrifices and Benefits
    Bare, Jane C.
    Hofstetter, Patrick
    Pennington, David W.
    de Haes, Helias A. Udo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2000, 5 (06) : 319 - 326
  • [9] Spatialised fate factors for nitrate in catchments: Modelling approach and implication for LCA results
    Basset-Mens, Claudine
    Anibar, Lamiaa
    Durand, Patrick
    van der Werf, Hayo M. G.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 367 (01) : 367 - 382
  • [10] Bautista-de los Santos QM, 2016, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V2, P631, DOI [10.1039/C6EW00030D, 10.1039/c6ew00030d]