Motor imagery alone drives corticospinal excitability during concurrent action observation and motor imagery

被引:46
作者
Meers, Rosie [1 ]
Nuttall, Helen E. [1 ]
Vogt, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Dept Psychol, Lancaster, England
关键词
Motor simulation; Motor resonance; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor evoked potentials; Neurorehabilitation; LATERAL OCCIPITOTEMPORAL CORTEX; FACILITATION; MODULATION; REPRESENTATIONS; ACTIVATION; IMITATION; MECHANISM; TASKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.012
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We studied the motor simulation processes involved in concurrent action observation and motor imagery (AO+MI) using motor evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. During congruent AO+MI, participants were shown videos of a model's hand performing rhythmical finger movements, and they imagined moving the same finger of their own hand in synchrony with the observed finger. During incongruent AO+MI, the imagery task involved a different finger from the observed one. As expected, congruent AO+MI yielded robust facilitatory effects, relative to baseline, only in the effector involved in the task. Incongruent AO+MI produced equally pronounced effects in the effector that was engaged in MI, whilst no corticospinal facilitation was found for the effector corresponding to the observed action. We further replicated that engaging in pure AO without MI does not produce reliable effects. These results do not support the proposal that observed and imagined action are both simulated at the level of the primary motor cortex. Rather, motor imagery alone can sufficiently explain the observed effects in both AO+MI conditions. This bears clear implications for the application of AO+MI procedures in sport and neurorehabilitation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 333
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Differential cortical activation during observation and observation-and-imagination [J].
Berends, H. I. ;
Wolkorte, R. ;
Ijzerman, M. J. ;
van Putten, M. J. A. M. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 229 (03) :337-345
[2]  
Binks J. A., 2018, 2018 M RES IM OBS GR
[3]   Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during the observation of a cyclic hand movement [J].
Borroni, P ;
Montagna, M ;
Cerri, G ;
Baldissera, F .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 1065 (1-2) :115-124
[4]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[5]   TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX WITH MAGNETIC STIMULATION - FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY [J].
BRASILNETO, JP ;
MCSHANE, LM ;
FUHR, P ;
HALLETT, M ;
COHEN, LG .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (01) :9-16
[6]   Inhibition or facilitation? Modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery [J].
Bruno, Valentina ;
Fossataro, Carlotta ;
Garbarini, Francesca .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2018, 111 :360-368
[7]   Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation [J].
Buccino, Giovanni .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 369 (1644)
[8]   Commentary: Motor Imagery during Action Observation: A Brief Review of Evidence, Theory and Future Research Opportunities [J].
Carson, Howie J. ;
Collins, Dave J. .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
[9]   Analysis of mirror neuron system activation during action observation alone and action observation with motor imagery tasks [J].
Cengiz, Bulent ;
Vuralli, Doga ;
Zinnuroglu, Murat ;
Bayer, Gozde ;
Golmohammadzadeh, Hassan ;
Gunendi, Zafer ;
Turgut, Ali Emre ;
Irfanoglu, Bulent ;
Arikan, Kutluk Bilge .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 236 (02) :497-503
[10]   Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions [J].
Clark, S ;
Tremblay, F ;
Ste-Marie, D .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2004, 42 (01) :105-112