Clinimetric, properties of 3 instruments measuring postoperative recovery in a gynecologic surgical population

被引:43
作者
Kluivers, Kirsten B. [1 ]
Hendriks, Jan C. M. [2 ]
Mol, Ben W. J. [3 ,4 ]
Bongers, Marlies Y. [3 ]
Vierhout, Mark E. [1 ]
Brolmann, Hans A. M. [5 ]
de Vet, Henrica C. W. [6 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.027
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. General, health-related quality-of-life questionnaires and recovery-specific questionnaires have been used to measure recovery in surgical patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinimetric properties of 3 recovery instruments and to examine whether recovery-specific instruments are useful. Methods. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40), Recovery Index-10 (RI-10), and RAAD-36 health survey were used to measure recovery in women undergoing different types of hysterectomy in the first 12 weeks after operation. Construct validity was assessed by testing predefined hypotheses. The changes observed during the postoperative period were used as indicators for responsiveness. Results. One hundred and sixty-one women were included. Response rate and internal consistency were found satisfactory. The highest number of hypotheses used for assessment of construct validity was confirmed in the RI-10. The RI-10 was more responsive compared with the QoR-40 and the RAND-36. Conclusions. Because construct validity and responsiveness were greatest in the RI-10, we conclude that this short recovery-specific instrument is useful in studies evaluating postoperative recovery. We recommend the use of the RI-10, unless the immediate postoperative days are of interest in which the QoR-40 was valid.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 21
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Health measurement scales
[2]   Age-specific detriments to quality of life among breast cancer patients one year after diagnosis [J].
Arndt, V ;
Merx, H ;
Stürmer, T ;
Stegmaier, C ;
Ziegler, H ;
Brenner, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (05) :673-680
[3]   Quality of life as subjective experience:: Reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Hürny, C ;
Maibach, R ;
Herrmann, R ;
Laffer, U .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (07) :775-782
[4]   A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments [J].
Coons, SJ ;
Rao, S ;
Keininger, DL ;
Hays, RD .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (01) :13-35
[5]   Current challenges in clinimetrics [J].
de Vet, HCW ;
Terwee, CB ;
Bouter, LM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (12) :1137-1141
[6]   MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].
GUYATT, G ;
WALTER, S ;
NORMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178
[7]  
Hays R D, 1993, Health Econ, V2, P217, DOI 10.1002/hec.4730020305
[8]   Measuring health-related quality of life in older patient populations - A review of current approaches [J].
Hickey, A ;
Barker, M ;
McGee, H ;
O'Boyle, C .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2005, 23 (10) :971-993
[9]   Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J].
Johnson, N ;
Barlow, D ;
Lethaby, A ;
Tavender, E ;
Curr, L ;
Garry, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7506) :1478-1481
[10]   Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease [J].
Johnson, N. ;
Barlow, D. ;
Lethaby, A. ;
Tavender, E. ;
Curr, E. ;
Garry, R. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (02)