Opportunities and challenges for international institutional data comparisons

被引:9
作者
Lepori, Benedetto [1 ,4 ]
Borden, Victor M. H. [2 ]
Coates, Hamish [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Svizzera Italiana, Inst Commun & Publ Policy, Fac Commun Media & Soc, Lugano, Switzerland
[2] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Educ IOE, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
关键词
Higher education data; comparative higher education studies; institutional classification; HIGHER-EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS; UNIVERSITY RANKINGS; POLICY; PRODUCTIVITY; INDICATORS; FAREWELL; SYSTEMS; MNCS;
D O I
10.1080/21568235.2022.2094817
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper discusses empirical comparisons of higher education institutions across world regions. It argues that institutional data systems have the potential for complementing global comparisons promoted by rankings by providing sensible information on institutional size, budgets, staffing, enrolments and activity profiles. With this perspective in hand, this paper tackles three questions. First, how is it feasible to identify Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) given their complex structures? Second, how is it feasible to define the perimeter of HEI sectors? Third, what kinds of data could be used for comparison, and where are the main data gaps? By analysing institutional data systems across the United States, Europe and Asia, the paper concludes that institutional data systems display some remarkable similarities that make them an important resource for global comparisons; however, variation in the context of data production and usage implies differences in the higher education perimeter and on institutional delimitation; sensible comparisons, therefore, require explicit knowledge of the institutional context in which data have been borne.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 390
页数:18
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [21] The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project
    Daraio, Cinzia
    Bonaccorsi, Andrea
    Geuna, Aldo
    Lepori, Benedetto
    Bach, Laurent
    Bogetoft, Peter
    Cardoso, Margarida F.
    Castro-Martinez, Elena
    Crespi, Gustavo
    Fernandez de Lucio, Ignacio
    Fried, Harold
    Garcia-Aracil, Adela
    Inzelt, Annamaria
    Jongbloed, Ben
    Kempkes, Gerhard
    Llerena, Patrick
    Matt, Mireille
    Olivares, Maria
    Pohl, Carsten
    Raty, Tarmo
    Rosa, Maria J.
    Sarrico, Claudia S.
    Simar, Leopold
    Slipersaeter, Stig
    Teixeira, Pedro N.
    Vanden Eeckaut, Philippe
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (01) : 148 - 164
  • [22] de Boer H, 2007, NEW FORMS OF GOVERNANCE IN RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS: DISCIPLINARY APPROACHES, INTERFACES AND INTEGRATION, P137, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-5831-8_5
  • [23] Desrosières A, 2001, SOC RES, V68, P339
  • [24] The effect of university mergers on the Shanghai ranking
    Docampo, D.
    Egret, D.
    Cram, L.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 104 (01) : 175 - 191
  • [25] Drori G.S., 2006, Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change
  • [26] Etzkowitz H., 2004, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, V1, P64
  • [27] EUROSTAT, 2010, Business Registers. Recommendation Manual
  • [28] The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective
    Ferlie, Ewan
    Musselin, Christine
    Andresani, Gianluca
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 56 (03) : 325 - 348
  • [29] Geiger R.L., 1993, RES RELEVANT KNOWLED
  • [30] Productivity, performance, efficiency, impact-What do we measure anyway? Some comments on the paper "A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators" by Abramo and D'Angelo
    Glanzel, Wolfgang
    Thijs, Bart
    Debackere, Koenraad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2016, 10 (02) : 658 - 660