Opportunities and challenges for international institutional data comparisons

被引:9
作者
Lepori, Benedetto [1 ,4 ]
Borden, Victor M. H. [2 ]
Coates, Hamish [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Svizzera Italiana, Inst Commun & Publ Policy, Fac Commun Media & Soc, Lugano, Switzerland
[2] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Educ IOE, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
关键词
Higher education data; comparative higher education studies; institutional classification; HIGHER-EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS; UNIVERSITY RANKINGS; POLICY; PRODUCTIVITY; INDICATORS; FAREWELL; SYSTEMS; MNCS;
D O I
10.1080/21568235.2022.2094817
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper discusses empirical comparisons of higher education institutions across world regions. It argues that institutional data systems have the potential for complementing global comparisons promoted by rankings by providing sensible information on institutional size, budgets, staffing, enrolments and activity profiles. With this perspective in hand, this paper tackles three questions. First, how is it feasible to identify Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) given their complex structures? Second, how is it feasible to define the perimeter of HEI sectors? Third, what kinds of data could be used for comparison, and where are the main data gaps? By analysing institutional data systems across the United States, Europe and Asia, the paper concludes that institutional data systems display some remarkable similarities that make them an important resource for global comparisons; however, variation in the context of data production and usage implies differences in the higher education perimeter and on institutional delimitation; sensible comparisons, therefore, require explicit knowledge of the institutional context in which data have been borne.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 390
页数:18
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2016, 10 (02) : 646 - 651
  • [2] Aliyeva Aida, 2018, NPEC 2018-023
  • [3] Altbach P.G., 1999, Tertiary Education and Management, V5, P105, DOI DOI 10.1080/13583883.1999.9966985
  • [4] Barré R, 2004, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH: THE USE OF PUBLICATION AND PATENT STATISTICS IN STUDIES OF S&T SYSTEMS, P115
  • [5] Becher T., 2001, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR
  • [6] Funding, is it key for standing out in the university rankings?
    Benito, Monica
    Gil, Pilar
    Romera, Rosario
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 121 (02) : 771 - 792
  • [7] Bogetoft Peter., 2007, Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation. Specialization and Performance in Europe, P443
  • [8] Indicators on individual higher education institutions: Addressing data problems and comparability issues
    Bonaccorsi, Andrea
    Daraio, Cinzia
    Lepori, Benedetto
    Sliperseter, Stig
    [J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2007, 16 (02) : 66 - 78
  • [9] Bonaccorsi Andrea., 2007, Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation. Specialization and Performance in Europe, P31
  • [10] Borden V.H., 2013, New Directions for Institutional Research, V2013, P39, DOI DOI 10.1002/IR.20038