Prediction of Fracture Risk in Men: A Cohort Study

被引:25
|
作者
Byberg, Liisa [6 ]
Gedeborg, Rolf [1 ]
Cars, Thomas [2 ]
Sundstrom, Johan [3 ]
Berglund, Lars [4 ]
Kilander, Lena [2 ]
Melhus, Hakan [5 ]
Michaelsson, Karl [6 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci Anesthesiol Intens Care Med & Pain, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci Acute & Internal Med, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ, Uppsala Clin Res Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci Osteoporosis & Clin Pharmacogenet, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
COMORBIDITY; LIFESTYLE; MEDICINE; FRACTURE; PREDICTION; HIP FRACTURE; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; OLDER-PEOPLE; FOLLOW-UP; WOMEN; MORTALITY; BMD; COMORBIDITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1002/jbmr.1498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
FRAX is a tool that identifies individuals with high fracture risk who will benefit from pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. However, a majority of fractures among elderly occur in people without osteoporosis and most occur after a fall. Our aim was to accurately identify men with a high future risk of fracture, independent of cause. In the population-based Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men (ULSAM) and using survival analysis we studied different models' prognostic values (R-2) for any fracture and hip fracture within 10 years from age 50 (n = 2322), 60 (n = 1852), 71 (n = 1221), and 82 (n = 526) years. During the total follow-up period from age 50 years, 897 fractures occurred in 585 individuals. Of these, 281 were hip fractures occurring in 189 individuals. The rates of any fracture were 5.7/1000 person-years at risk from age 50 years and 25.9/1000 person-years at risk from age 82 years. Corresponding hip fractures rates were 2.9 and 11.7/1000 person-years at risk. The FRAX model included all variables in FRAX except bone mineral density. The full model combining FRAX variables, comorbidity, medications, and behavioral factors explained 25% to 45% of all fractures and 80% to 92% of hip fractures, depending on age. The corresponding prognostic values of the FRAX model were 7% to 17% for all fractures and 41% to 60% for hip fractures. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) comparing the full model with the FRAX model ranged between 40% and 53% for any fracture and between 40% and 87% for hip fracture. Within the highest quintile of predicted fracture risk with the full model, one-third of the men will have a fracture within 10 years after age 71 years and two-thirds after age 82 years. We conclude that the addition of comorbidity, medication, and behavioral factors to the clinical components of FRAX can substantially improve the ability to identify men at high risk of fracture, especially hip fracture. (c) 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 807
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Peripheral quantitative computed tomography measures are associated with adult fracture risk: The Hertfordshire Cohort Study
    Dennison, E. M.
    Jameson, K. A.
    Edwards, M. H.
    Denison, H. J.
    Sayer, A. Aihie
    Cooper, C.
    BONE, 2014, 64 : 13 - 17
  • [22] Incident fracture associated with increased risk of mortality even after adjusting for frailty status in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) Cohort Study
    Iki, M.
    Fujita, Y.
    Tamaki, J.
    Kouda, K.
    Yura, A.
    Sato, Y.
    Moon, J. S.
    Harano, A.
    Hazaki, K.
    Kajita, E.
    Hamada, M.
    Arai, K.
    Tomioka, K.
    Okamoto, N.
    Kurumatani, N.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (03) : 871 - 880
  • [23] Distribution of clinical risk factors for fracture in a Brussels cohort of postmenopausal women: The FRISBEE study and comparison with other major cohort studies
    Cappelle, S. I.
    Ramon, I.
    Dekelver, C.
    Rozenberg, S.
    Baleanu, F.
    Karmali, R.
    Rubinstein, M.
    Tondeur, M.
    Moreau, M.
    Paesmans, M.
    Bergmann, P.
    Body, J. -J.
    MATURITAS, 2017, 106 : 1 - 7
  • [24] Performance of FRAX in a cohort of community-dwelling, ambulatory older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study
    Ettinger, B.
    Ensrud, K. E.
    Blackwell, T.
    Curtis, J. R.
    Lapidus, J. A.
    Orwoll, E. S.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 24 (04) : 1185 - 1193
  • [25] Predictors of Excess Mortality After Fracture: A Population-Based Cohort Study
    Melton, L. Joseph, III
    Atkinson, Elizabeth J.
    St Sauver, Jennifer L.
    Achenbach, Sara J.
    Therneau, Terry M.
    Rocca, Walter A.
    Amin, Shreyasee
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2014, 29 (07) : 1681 - 1690
  • [26] Fracture risk of patients suffering from dizziness: A retrospective cohort study
    Kruschinski, Carsten
    Sheehy, Odile
    Hummers-Pradier, Eva
    Lelorier, Jacques
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (04) : 229 - 235
  • [27] Estimation of absolute fracture risk among middle-aged and older men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk population cohort study
    Moayyeri, Alireza
    Kaptoge, Stephen
    Luben, Robert N.
    Wareham, Nicholas J.
    Bingham, Sheila
    Reeve, Jonathan
    Khaw, Kay Tee
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 24 (05) : 259 - 266
  • [28] Overview of Fracture Prediction Tools
    Kanis, John A.
    Harvey, Nicholas C.
    Johansson, Helena
    Oden, Anders
    McCloskey, Eugene V.
    Leslie, William D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2017, 20 (03) : 444 - 450
  • [29] Risk of Major Osteoporotic Fracture After Cardiovascular Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan
    Lai, Shih-Wei
    Liao, Kuan-Fu
    Lai, Hsueh-Chou
    Tsai, Pang-Yao
    Lin, Cheng-Li
    Chen, Pei-Chun
    Sung, Fung-Chang
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [30] Evaluating the performance of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in fracture risk prediction and developing a new Charlson Fracture Index (CFI): a register-based cohort study
    Clausen, A.
    Moller, S.
    Skjodt, M. K.
    Bech, B. H.
    Rubin, K. H.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 33 (03) : 549 - 561