Inferring the connectivity of coupled oscillators from time-series statistical similarity analysis

被引:47
作者
Tirabassi, Giulio [1 ]
Sevilla-Escoboza, Ricardo [2 ]
Buldu, Javier M. [3 ,4 ]
Masoller, Cristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Fis & Engn Nucl, Barcelona 08222, Spain
[2] Tech Univ Madrid, Ctr Biomed Technol, Madrid 28223, Spain
[3] Univ Guadalajara, Ctr Univ Lagos, Lagos De Moreno 47460, Jalisco, Mexico
[4] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Complex Syst Grp, Madrid, Spain
关键词
CLIMATE NETWORKS; SYNCHRONIZATION; FLUCTUATIONS;
D O I
10.1038/srep10829
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A system composed by interacting dynamical elements can be represented by a network, where the nodes represent the elements that constitute the system, and the links account for their interactions, which arise due to a variety of mechanisms, and which are often unknown. A popular method for inferring the system connectivity (i.e., the set of links among pairs of nodes) is by performing a statistical similarity analysis of the time-series collected from the dynamics of the nodes. Here, by considering two systems of coupled oscillators (Kuramoto phase oscillators and Rossler chaotic electronic oscillators) with known and controllable coupling conditions, we aim at testing the performance of this inference method, by using linear and non linear statistical similarity measures. We find that, under adequate conditions, the network links can be perfectly inferred, i.e., no mistakes are made regarding the presence or absence of links. These conditions for perfect inference require: i) an appropriated choice of the observed variable to be analysed, ii) an appropriated interaction strength, and iii) an adequate thresholding of the similarity matrix. For the dynamical units considered here we find that the linear statistical similarity measure performs, in general, better than the non-linear ones.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The Kuramoto model:: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena [J].
Acebrón, JA ;
Bonilla, LL ;
Vicente, CJP ;
Ritort, F ;
Spigler, R .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2005, 77 (01) :137-185
[2]   Synchronization in complex networks [J].
Arenas, Alex ;
Diaz-Guilera, Albert ;
Kurths, Jurgen ;
Moreno, Yamir ;
Zhou, Changsong .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2008, 469 (03) :93-153
[3]   Permutation entropy: A natural complexity measure for time series [J].
Bandt, C ;
Pompe, B .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 88 (17) :4
[4]   Stability of Climate Networks with Time [J].
Berezin, Y. ;
Gozolchiani, A. ;
Guez, O. ;
Havlin, S. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2012, 2
[5]   From brain to earth and climate systems: Small-world interaction networks or not? [J].
Bialonski, Stephan ;
Horstmann, Marie-Therese ;
Lehnertz, Klaus .
CHAOS, 2010, 20 (01)
[6]   Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems [J].
Bullmore, Edward T. ;
Sporns, Olaf .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 10 (03) :186-198
[7]  
Carroll Thomas L., 1995, Nonlinear dynamics in circuits
[8]   Extracting connectivity from dynamics of networks with uniform bidirectional coupling [J].
Ching, Emily S. C. ;
Lai, Pik-Yin ;
Leung, C. Y. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2013, 88 (04)
[9]   Inferring interdependencies in climate networks constructed at inter-annual, intra-season and longer time scales [J].
Deza, J. I. ;
Barreiro, M. ;
Masoller, C. .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS, 2013, 222 (02) :511-523
[10]   Scale-free brain functional networks -: art. no. 018102 [J].
Eguíluz, VM ;
Chialvo, DR ;
Cecchi, GA ;
Baliki, M ;
Apkarian, AV .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2005, 94 (01)