Clinical Results and Outcome Improvement Over Time in Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:4
|
作者
Di Deo, Priscilla [7 ]
Lingsma, Hester [2 ]
Nieboer, Daan [2 ]
Roozenbeek, Bob [3 ]
Citerio, Giuseppe [4 ,5 ]
Beretta, Luigi [6 ]
Magnoni, Sandra [1 ,7 ]
Zanier, Elisa R. [8 ]
Stocchetti, Nino [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Physiopathol & Transplantat, Milan, Italy
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Sch Med & Surg, Monza, Italy
[5] San Gerardo Hosp, Neurointens Care, Monza, Italy
[6] Hosp San Raffaele, Inst Sci, Neurointens Care Unit, Milan, Italy
[7] Osped Maggiore Policlin, Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Neurointens Care Unit, Milan, Italy
[8] IRCCS Ist Mario Negri, Dept Neurosci, Via G La Masa 19, I-20154 Milan, Italy
关键词
outcome; prognostic models; traumatic brain injury; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HEAD-INJURY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; IMPACT MODELS; INTERNATIONAL MISSION; PROGNOSTIC MODELS; MODERATE; CRASH; PREDICTION; CARE;
D O I
10.1089/neu.2015.4026
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Prognostic models for traumatic brain injury (TBI) are important tools both in clinical practice and research if properly validated, preferably by external validation. Prognostic models also offer the possibility of monitoring performance by comparing predicted outcomes with observed outcomes. In this study, we applied the prognostic models developed by the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) in an Italian multi-center database (Neurolink) with two aims: to compare observed with predicted outcomes and to check for a possible improvement of clinical outcome over the 11 years of patient inclusion in Neurolink. We applied the IMPACT models to patients included in Neurolink between 1997 and 2007. Performance of the models was assessed by determining calibration (with calibration plots) and discrimination (by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]). Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze a possible trend in outcomes over time, adjusted for predicted outcomes. A total of 1401 patients were studied. Patients had a median age of 40 years and 51% had a Glasgow Coma Scale motor score of 5 or 6. The models showed good discrimination, with AUCs of 0.86 (according to the Core Model) and 0.88 (Extended Model), and adequate calibration, with the overall observed risk of unfavorable outcome and mortality being less than predicted. Outcomes significantly improved over time. This study shows that the IMPACT models performed reasonably well in the Neurolink data and can be used for monitoring performance. After adjustment for predicted outcomes with the prognostic models, we observed a substantial improvement of patient outcomes over time in the three Neurolink centers.
引用
收藏
页码:2019 / 2025
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Traumatic Brain Injury: What Is a Favorable Outcome?
    Zuckerman, David A.
    Giacino, Joseph T.
    Bodien, Yelena G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2022, 39 (13-14) : 1010 - 1012
  • [22] Large Between-Center Differences in Outcome After Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the International Mission on Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) Study
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Roozenbeek, Bob
    Li, Bayoue
    Lu, Juan
    Weir, James
    Butcher, Isabella
    Marmarou, Anthony
    Murray, Gordon D.
    Maas, Andrew I. R.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 68 (03) : 601 - 607
  • [23] Early outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury, pre-injury alcohol abuse and intoxication at time of injury
    De Guise, Elaine
    Leblanc, Joanne
    Dagher, Jehane
    Lamoureux, Julie
    Al Jishi, Ahmed
    Maleki, Mohammad
    Marcoux, Judith
    Feyz, Mitra
    BRAIN INJURY, 2009, 23 (11) : 853 - 865
  • [24] Prognostic value of various intracranial pathologies in traumatic brain injury
    Lesko, M. M.
    Bouamra, O.
    O'Brien, S.
    Lecky, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2012, 38 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [25] Acute and Subacute Outcome Predictors in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Monocentric Study
    Gritti, Paolo
    Zangari, Rosalia
    Carobbio, Alessandra
    Zucchi, Alberto
    Lorini, Ferdinando Luca
    Ferri, Francesco
    Agostinis, Cristina
    Lanterna, Luigi Andrea
    Brembilla, Carlo
    Foresti, Camillo
    Barbui, Tiziano
    Biroli, Francesco
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 128 : E531 - E540
  • [26] Employment outcome four years after a severe traumatic brain injury: results of the Paris severe traumatic brain injury study
    Ruet, Alexis
    Jourdan, Claire
    Bayen, Eleonore
    Darnoux, Emmanuelle
    Sahridj, Dalila
    Ghout, Idir
    Azerad, Sylvie
    Diehl, Pascale Pradat
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Charanton, James
    Azouvi, Claire Vallat
    Azouvi, Philippe
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (18) : 2200 - 2207
  • [27] Intracranial Pressure Dose and Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury
    Sheth, Kevin N.
    Stein, Deborah M.
    Aarabi, Bizhan
    Hu, Peter
    Kufera, Joseph A.
    Scalea, Thomas M.
    Hanley, Daniel F.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2013, 18 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [28] Computed tomography and clinical outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury
    Stenberg, Maud
    Koskinen, Lars-Owe D.
    Jonasson, Per
    Levi, Richard
    Stainacke, Britt-Marie
    BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (03) : 351 - 358
  • [29] Machine learning predicts improvement of functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients after inpatient rehabilitation
    Say, Irene
    Chen, Yiling Elaine
    Sun, Matthew Z.
    Li, Jingyi Jessica
    Lu, Daniel C.
    FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2022, 3
  • [30] Outcome Assessment in Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials and Prognostic Studies
    Sherer, Mark
    Roebuck-Spencer, Tresa
    Davis, Lynne Cole
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2010, 25 (02) : 92 - 98