PHASE I TRIAL OF PELVIC NODAL DOSE ESCALATION WITH HYPOFRACTIONATED IMRT FOR HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER

被引:56
作者
Adkison, Jarrod B. [1 ]
McHaffie, Derek R. [1 ]
Bentzen, Soren M. [1 ]
Patel, Rakesh R. [1 ]
Khuntia, Deepak [1 ]
Peteret, Daniel G. [2 ]
Hong, Theodore S. [1 ]
Tome, Wolfgang [1 ]
Ritter, Mark A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Human Oncol, Carbone Canc Ctr, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[2] Rapid City Reg Hosp, John T Vucurevich Reg Canc Care Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rapid City, SD USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2012年 / 82卷 / 01期
关键词
Pelvic lymph node dose escalation; Bowel displacement board; Rectal balloon; Hypofractionated radiation therapy; Image-guided prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy; ADEQUATE STAGING PROCEDURE; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; III TRIAL; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOTHERAPY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; THERAPY; NEOADJUVANT; IRRADIATION; ADJUVANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Toxicity concerns have limited pelvic nodal prescriptions to doses that may be suboptimal for controlling microscopic disease. In a prospective trial, we tested whether image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can safely deliver escalated nodal doses while treating the prostate with hypofractionated radiotherapy in 51/2 weeks. Methods and Materials: Pelvic nodal and prostatic image-guided IMRT was delivered to 53 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk patients to a nodal dose of 56 Gy in 2-Gy fractions with concomitant treatment of the prostate to 70 Gy in 28 fractions of 2.5 Gy, and 50 of 53 patients received androgen deprivation for a median duration of 12 months. Results: The median follow-up time was 25.4 months (range, 4.2-57.2). No early Grade 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group or Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3.0 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were seen. The cumulative actuarial incidence of Grade 2 early GU toxicity (primarily alpha blocker initiation) was 38%. The rate was 32% for Grade 2 early GI toxicity. None of the dose volume descriptors correlated with GU toxicity, and only the volume of bowel receiving >= 30 Gy correlated with early GI toxicity (p = 0.029). Maximum late Grades 1, 2, and 3 GU toxicities were seen in 30%, 25%, and 2% of patients, respectively. Maximum late Grades land 2 GI toxicities were seen in 30% and 8% (rectal bleeding requiring cautery) of patients, respectively. The estimated 3-year biochemical control (nadir + 2) was 81.2 +/- 6.6%. No patient manifested pelvic nodal failure, whereas 2 experienced paraaortic nodal failure outside the field. The six other clinical failures were distant only. Conclusions: Pelvic IMRT nodal dose escalation to 56 Gy was delivered concurrently with 70 Gy of hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy in a convenient, resource-efficient, and well-tolerated 28-fraction schedule. Pelvic nodal dose escalation may be an option in any future exploration of potential benefits of pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 190
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   ELECTIVE PELVIC IRRADIATION IN STAGE A2, B CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - ANALYSIS OF RTOG-77-06 [J].
ASBELL, SO ;
KRALL, JM ;
PILEPICH, MV ;
BAERWALD, H ;
SAUSE, WT ;
HANKS, GE ;
PEREZ, CA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (06) :1307-1316
[2]  
Bader P, 2002, J UROLOGY, V168, P518
[3]   Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (02) :514-518
[4]   Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer [J].
Bernier, J ;
Domenge, C ;
Ozsahin, M ;
Matuszewska, K ;
Lefèbvre, JL ;
Greiner, RH ;
Giralt, J ;
Maingon, P ;
Rolland, F ;
Bolla, M ;
Cognetti, F ;
Bourhis, J ;
Kirkpatrick, A ;
van Glabbeke, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (19) :1945-1952
[5]   ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN SELECT PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
BLUESTEIN, DL ;
BOSTWICK, DG ;
BERGSTRALH, EJ ;
OESTERLING, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1315-1320
[6]   Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial [J].
Bolla, M ;
Collette, L ;
Blank, L ;
Warde, P ;
Dubois, JB ;
Mirimanoff, RO ;
Storme, G ;
Bernier, J ;
Kuten, A ;
Sternberg, C ;
Mattelaer, J ;
Torecilla, JL ;
Pfeffer, JR ;
Cutajar, CL ;
Zurlo, A ;
Pierart, M .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9327) :103-108
[7]   Percentage of positive biopsy cores can improve the ability to predict lymph node invasion in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Zanni, Giuseppe ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (06) :1573-1581
[8]   Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Zanni, Giuseppe ;
Scattoni, Vincenzo ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (01) :147-151
[9]   Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Zanni, Giuseppe ;
Scattoni, Vincenzo ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (06) :1019-1027
[10]   Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection [J].
Burkhard, FC ;
Bader, P ;
Schneider, E ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 42 (02) :84-90