Importance of Time Point-Specific Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Osteoporosis Treatments: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analyses

被引:7
作者
Willems, Damon [1 ]
Javaid, Muhammad Kassim [2 ]
Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael [2 ]
Libanati, Cesar [1 ]
Yehoshua, Alon [3 ]
Charokopou, Mata [1 ]
机构
[1] UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
[3] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
comparative effectiveness; fracture prevention; indirect treatment comparison; network metaanalysis; osteoporosis; systematic review; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; BONE-DENSITY; ROMOSOZUMAB TREATMENT; COMPARATIVE EFFICACY; VERTEBRAL FRACTURES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ALENDRONATE; PREVENTION; RISK; BISPHOSPHONATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.11.015
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: The efficacy comparison of osteoporosis treatments can be hindered by the absence of head-to-head trials; instead, network meta-analyses (NMAs) have been used to determine comparative effectiveness. This study was the first to investigate the impact of time point-specific NMAs of osteoporosis treatments on variability in treatments' onset of action caused by their different mechanisms of actions and trial designs. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of treatments for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, including romosozumab (ROMO), teriparatide (TPTD), abaloparatide (ABL), alendronate (ALN), risedronate (RIS), ibandronate (IB), zoledronic acid/zoledronate (ZOL), denosumab (DEN), and raloxifene (RLX), on at least 1 fracture or bone mineral density (BMD) outcome. Of 100 RCTs identified in 5 databases, 27 RCTs were included for NMAs of new vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fracture outcomes at 12, 24, and 36 months, and 47 RCTs were included for NMAs of BMD outcomes at lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck to compare the relative efficacy of osteoporosis treatments. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Findings: For vertebral fractures, TPTD (83.63%), ABL (69.11%), and ROMO/ALN (78.70%) had the highest probability to be the most effective treatment at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. ROMO/ALN had the highest probability (54.4%, 64.69%, and 90.29%, respectively) to be the most effective treatment for nonvertebral fractures at 12, 24, and 36 months. For hip fractures, ROMO/ALN (46.31%), ABL (61.1%), and DEN (55.21%) had the highest probability to be the most effective treatment at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. ROMO had the highest probability (76.06%, 44.19%, and 51.78%, respectively) to be the most effective treatment for BMD outcomes at lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 97
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [31] Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Y.
    Cao, Y.
    Zhang, S.
    Zhang, W.
    Zhang, B.
    Tang, Q.
    Li, Z.
    Wu, J.
    [J]. CLIMACTERIC, 2018, 21 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [32] McClung Michael R, 2018, Osteoporos Sarcopenia, V4, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.afos.2018.03.002
  • [33] Effect of Abaloparatide vs Placebo on New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Miller, Paul D.
    Hattersley, Gary
    Riis, Bente Juel
    Williams, Gregory C.
    Lau, Edith
    Russo, Luis Augusto
    Alexandersen, Peter
    Zerbini, Cristiano A. F.
    Hu, Ming-yi
    Harris, Alan G.
    Fitzpatrick, Lorraine A.
    Cosman, Felicia
    Christiansen, Claus
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (07): : 722 - 733
  • [34] Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
    Moher, David
    Liberati, Alessandro
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (10) : 1006 - 1012
  • [35] Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density and Risk of Vertebral Fractures with Denosumab Treatment in Japanese Postmenopausal Women and Men with Osteoporosis
    Okubo, Naoki
    Matsui, Shigeyuki
    Matsumoto, Toshio
    Sugimoto, Toshitsugu
    Hosoi, Takayuki
    Osakabe, Taisuke
    Watanabe, Ko
    Takami, Hideo
    Shiraki, Masataka
    Nakamura, Toshitaka
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 107 (06) : 559 - 566
  • [36] Imminent fracture risk assessments in the UK FLS setting: implications and challenges
    Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael
    Charokopou, Mata
    Toth, Emese
    Donnelly, Kerry
    Cooper, Cyrus
    Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
    Libanati, Cesar
    Javaid, Muhammad K.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [37] Multinational, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the effects of alendronate on bone density and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass:: Results of the FOSIT study
    Pols, HAP
    Felsenberg, D
    Hanley, DA
    Stepán, J
    Muñoz-Torres, M
    Wilkin, TJ
    Qin-sheng, G
    Galich, AM
    Vandormael, K
    Yates, AJ
    Stych, B
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 9 (05) : 461 - 468
  • [38] Comparative effects of raloxifene and alendronate on fracture outcomes in postmenopausal women with low bone mass
    Recker, Robert R.
    Kendler, David
    Recknor, Christopher P.
    Rooney, Theodore W.
    Lewiecki, E. Michael
    Utian, Wulf H.
    Cauley, Jane A.
    Lorraine, Joanne
    Qu, Yongming
    Kulkarni, Pandurang M.
    Gaich, Carol L.
    Wong, Mayme
    Plouffe, Leo, Jr.
    Stock, John L.
    [J]. BONE, 2007, 40 (04) : 843 - 851
  • [39] RStudio T., 2018, RSTUDIO
  • [40] Romosozumab or Alendronate for Fracture Prevention in Women with Osteoporosis
    Saag, Kenneth G.
    Petersen, Jeffrey
    Brandi, Maria Luisa
    Karaplis, Andrew C.
    Lorentzon, Mattias
    Thomas, Thierry
    Maddox, Judy
    Fan, Michelle
    Meisner, Paul D.
    Grauer, Andreas
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (15) : 1417 - 1427