Importance of Time Point-Specific Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Osteoporosis Treatments: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analyses

被引:7
作者
Willems, Damon [1 ]
Javaid, Muhammad Kassim [2 ]
Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael [2 ]
Libanati, Cesar [1 ]
Yehoshua, Alon [3 ]
Charokopou, Mata [1 ]
机构
[1] UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
[3] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
comparative effectiveness; fracture prevention; indirect treatment comparison; network metaanalysis; osteoporosis; systematic review; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; BONE-DENSITY; ROMOSOZUMAB TREATMENT; COMPARATIVE EFFICACY; VERTEBRAL FRACTURES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ALENDRONATE; PREVENTION; RISK; BISPHOSPHONATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.11.015
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: The efficacy comparison of osteoporosis treatments can be hindered by the absence of head-to-head trials; instead, network meta-analyses (NMAs) have been used to determine comparative effectiveness. This study was the first to investigate the impact of time point-specific NMAs of osteoporosis treatments on variability in treatments' onset of action caused by their different mechanisms of actions and trial designs. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of treatments for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, including romosozumab (ROMO), teriparatide (TPTD), abaloparatide (ABL), alendronate (ALN), risedronate (RIS), ibandronate (IB), zoledronic acid/zoledronate (ZOL), denosumab (DEN), and raloxifene (RLX), on at least 1 fracture or bone mineral density (BMD) outcome. Of 100 RCTs identified in 5 databases, 27 RCTs were included for NMAs of new vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fracture outcomes at 12, 24, and 36 months, and 47 RCTs were included for NMAs of BMD outcomes at lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck to compare the relative efficacy of osteoporosis treatments. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Findings: For vertebral fractures, TPTD (83.63%), ABL (69.11%), and ROMO/ALN (78.70%) had the highest probability to be the most effective treatment at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. ROMO/ALN had the highest probability (54.4%, 64.69%, and 90.29%, respectively) to be the most effective treatment for nonvertebral fractures at 12, 24, and 36 months. For hip fractures, ROMO/ALN (46.31%), ABL (61.1%), and DEN (55.21%) had the highest probability to be the most effective treatment at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. ROMO had the highest probability (76.06%, 44.19%, and 51.78%, respectively) to be the most effective treatment for BMD outcomes at lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 97
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Akkawi Ibrahim, 2018, Joints, V6, P122, DOI 10.1055/s-0038-1660790
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, BROKEN BONES BROKEN
  • [3] Efficacy of Pharmacological Therapies for the Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Barrionuevo, Patricia
    Kapoor, Ekta
    Asi, Noor
    Alahdab, Fares
    Mohammed, Khaled
    Benkhadra, Khalid
    Almasri, Jehad
    Farah, Wigdan
    Sarigianni, Maria
    Muthusamy, Kalpana
    Al Nofal, Alaa
    Haydour, Qusay
    Wang, Zhen
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2019, 104 (05) : 1623 - 1630
  • [4] Benjamin Biju, 2016, Osteoporos Sarcopenia, V2, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.afos.2016.03.003
  • [5] Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures
    Black, DM
    Cummings, SR
    Karpf, DB
    Cauley, JA
    Thompson, DE
    Nevitt, MC
    Bauer, DC
    Genant, HK
    Haskell, WL
    Marcus, R
    Ott, SM
    Torner, JC
    Quandt, SA
    Reiss, TF
    Ensrud, KE
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 348 (9041) : 1535 - 1541
  • [6] Change in Bone Density and Reduction in Fracture Risk: A Meta-Regression of Published Trials
    Bouxsein, Mary L.
    Eastell, Richard
    Lui, Li-Yung
    Wu, Lucy A.
    de Papp, Anne E.
    Grauer, Andreas
    Marin, Fernando
    Cauley, Jane A.
    Bauer, Douglas C.
    Black, Dennis M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2019, 34 (04) : 632 - 642
  • [7] BUGS, 2003, WINBUGS USER MANUAL
  • [8] Byun Ji-Hye, 2017, J Bone Metab, V24, P37
  • [9] Bone-Forming and Antiresorptive Effects of Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: Bone Histomorphometry and Microcomputed Tomography Analysis After 2 and 12 Months of Treatment
    Chavassieux, Pascale
    Chapurlat, Roland
    Portero-Muzy, Nathalie
    Roux, Jean-Paul
    Garcia, Pedro
    Brown, Jacques P.
    Libanati, Cesar
    Boyce, Rogely W.
    Wang, Andrea
    Grauer, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2019, 34 (09) : 1597 - 1608
  • [10] Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
    Cosman, F.
    Crittenden, D. B.
    Adachi, J. D.
    Binkley, N.
    Czerwinski, E.
    Ferrari, S.
    Hofbauer, L. C.
    Lau, E.
    Lewiecki, E. M.
    Miyauchi, A.
    Zerbini, C. A. F.
    Milmont, C. E.
    Chen, L.
    Maddox, J.
    Meisner, P. D.
    Libanati, C.
    Grauer, A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (16) : 1532 - 1543