Differentiation Between Benign and Metastatic Breast Lymph Nodes Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficients

被引:8
作者
Fardanesh, Reza [1 ]
Thakur, Sunitha B. [1 ,2 ]
Sevilimedu, Varadan [3 ]
Horvat, Joao V. [1 ]
Gullo, Roberto Lo [1 ]
Reiner, Jeffrey S. [1 ]
Eskreis-Winkler, Sarah [1 ]
Thakur, Nikita [1 ,4 ]
Pinker, Katja [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Touro Coll Osteopath Med, Middletown, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast cancer; prognostic factors; lymph nodes; diffusion-weighted imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; MRI; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; FROZEN-SECTION; WEIGHTED MRI; INTRAOPERATIVE EVALUATION; IMAGING IMPROVES; IMPRINT CYTOLOGY; CANCER; BIOPSY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.795265
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the range of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for benign axillary lymph nodes in contrast to malignant axillary lymph nodes, and to define the optimal ADC thresholds for three different ADC parameters (minimum, maximum, and mean ADC) in differentiating between benign and malignant lymph nodes. This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent breast MRI from January 2017-December 2020. Two-year follow-up breast imaging or histopathology served as the reference standard for axillary lymph node status. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for minimum, maximum, and mean ADC (min ADC, max ADC, and mean ADC) for benign vs malignant axillary lymph nodes were determined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and optimal ADC thresholds were determined using Youden's Index. The final study sample consisted of 217 patients (100% female, median age of 52 years (range, 22-81), 110 with benign axillary lymph nodes and 107 with malignant axillary lymph nodes. For benign axillary lymph nodes, ADC values (x10(-3) mm(2)/s) ranged from 0.522-2.712 for mean ADC, 0.774-3.382 for max ADC, and 0.071-2.409 for min ADC; for malignant axillary lymph nodes, ADC values (x10(-3) mm(2)/s) ranged from 0.796-1.080 for mean ADC, 1.168-1.592 for max ADC, and 0.351-0.688 for min ADC for malignant axillary lymph nodes. While there was a statistically difference in all ADC parameters (p<0.001) between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes, boxplots illustrate overlaps in ADC values, with the least overlap occurring with mean ADC, suggesting that this is the most useful ADC parameter for differentiating between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes. The mean ADC threshold that resulted in the highest diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant lymph nodes was 1.004x10(-3) mm(2)/s, yielding an accuracy of 75%, sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 79%, positive predictive value of 77%, and negative predictive value of 74%. This mean ADC threshold is lower than the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) mean ADC threshold of 1.300x10(-3) mm(2)/s, therefore suggesting that the EUSOBI threshold which was recently recommended for breast tumors should not be extrapolated to evaluate the axillary lymph nodes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Accuracy of Axillary Lymph Node Staging in Breast Cancer Patients: An Observer-Performance Study Comparison of MRI and Ultrasound [J].
Abe, Hiroyuki ;
Schacht, David ;
Kulkarni, Kirti ;
Shimauchi, Akiko ;
Yamaguchi, Ken ;
Sennett, Charlene A. ;
Jiang, Yulei .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (11) :1399-1404
[2]   Diffusion-weighted MRI for Unenhanced Breast Cancer Screening [J].
Amornsiripanitch, Nita ;
Bickelhaupt, Sebastian ;
Shin, Hee Jung ;
Dang, Madeline ;
Rahbar, Habib ;
Pinker, Katja ;
Partridge, Savannah C. .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (03) :504-520
[3]   Arm morbidity of axillary dissection with sentinel node biopsy versus delayed axillary dissection [J].
Ballal, Helen ;
Hunt, Catherine ;
Bharat, Chrianna ;
Murray, Kevin ;
Kamyab, Roshi ;
Saunders, Christobel .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 88 (09) :917-921
[4]   Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group [J].
Baltzer, Pascal ;
Mann, Ritse M. ;
Iima, Mami ;
Sigmund, Eric E. ;
Clauser, Paola ;
Gilbert, Fiona J. ;
Martincich, Laura ;
Partridge, Savannah C. ;
Patterson, Andrew ;
Pinker, Katja ;
Thibault, Fabienne ;
Camps-Herrero, Julia ;
Le Bihan, Denis .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) :1436-1450
[5]   Readout-segmented Echo-pIanar Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-weighted MR Breast Examinations at 3.0 T [J].
Bogner, Wolfgang ;
Pinker-Domenig, Katja ;
Bickel, Hubert ;
Chmelik, Marek ;
Weber, Michael ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Trattnig, Siegfried ;
Gruber, Stephan .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (01) :64-76
[6]   Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions [J].
Chen, Xin ;
Li, Wen-ling ;
Zhang, Yi-li ;
Wu, Qian ;
Guo, You-min ;
Bai, Zhi-lan .
BMC CANCER, 2010, 10
[7]   Is Screening Detected Bilateral Axillary Adenopathy on Mammography Clinically Significant? [J].
Chetlen, Alison ;
Nicholson, Brandi ;
Patrie, James T. ;
Harvey, Jennifer A. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (06) :582-587
[8]   Role of diffusion-weighted MRI: predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer [J].
Chung, Jin ;
Youk, Ji Hyun ;
Kim, Jeong-Ah ;
Gweon, Hye Mi ;
Kim, Eun-Kyung ;
Ryu, Young Hoon ;
Son, Eun Ju .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (08) :909-916
[9]   A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice [J].
Clauser, Paola ;
Mann, Ritse ;
Athanasiou, Alexandra ;
Prosch, Helmut ;
Pinker, Katja ;
Dietzel, Matthias ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Fuchsjaeger, Michael ;
Camps-Herrero, Julia ;
Sardanelli, Francesco ;
Forrai, Gabor ;
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) :1909-1918
[10]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845