Saliency-based 3D convolutional neural network for categorising common focal liver lesions on multisequence MRI

被引:14
作者
Wang, Shu-Hui [1 ,2 ]
Han, Xin-Jun [1 ]
Du, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Zhen-Chang [1 ]
Yuan, Chunwang [3 ]
Chen, Yinan [4 ,5 ]
Zhu, Yajing [4 ]
Dou, Xin [6 ]
Xu, Xiao-Wei [4 ]
Xu, Hui [1 ]
Yang, Zheng-Han [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Friendship Hosp, Dept Radiol, 95 Yongan Rd, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Weihai Municipal Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cheeloo Coll Med, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Youan Hosp, Ctr Intervent Oncol & Liver Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] SenseTime, SenseTime Res, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] SenseTime, WCH SenseTime Joint Lab, Shanghai, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[6] SenseTime, SenseBrain Technol, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
基金
国家重点研发计划; 北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deep learning; MRI; Classification; Focal liver lesion; Model interpretation; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LI-RADS; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; ENHANCEMENT PATTERNS; DIAGNOSIS; CT; MASSES;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-021-01117-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The imaging features of focal liver lesions (FLLs) are diverse and complex. Diagnosing FLLs with imaging alone remains challenging. We developed and validated an interpretable deep learning model for the classification of seven categories of FLLs on multisequence MRI and compared the differential diagnosis between the proposed model and radiologists. Methods In all, 557 lesions examined by multisequence MRI were utilised in this retrospective study and divided into training-validation (n = 444) and test (n = 113) datasets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the performance of the model. The accuracy and confusion matrix of the model and individual radiologists were compared. Saliency maps were generated to highlight the activation region based on the model perspective. Results The AUC of the two- and seven-way classifications of the model were 0.969 (95% CI 0.944-0.994) and from 0.919 (95% CI 0.857-0.980) to 0.999 (95% CI 0.996-1.000), respectively. The model accuracy (79.6%) of the seven-way classification was higher than that of the radiology residents (66.4%, p = 0.035) and general radiologists (73.5%, p = 0.346) but lower than that of the academic radiologists (85.4%, p = 0.291). Confusion matrices showed the sources of diagnostic errors for the model and individual radiologists for each disease. Saliency maps detected the activation regions associated with each predicted class. Conclusion This interpretable deep learning model showed high diagnostic performance in the differentiation of FLLs on multisequence MRI. The analysis principle contributing to the predictions can be explained via saliency maps.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Medical Image Analysis using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Review
    Anwar, Syed Muhammad
    Majid, Muhammad
    Qayyum, Adnan
    Awais, Muhammad
    Alnowami, Majdi
    Khan, Muhammad Khurram
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (11)
  • [2] Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS - An In-depth Analysis
    Barth, Borna K.
    Donati, Olivio F.
    Fischer, Michael A.
    Ulbrich, Erika J.
    Karlo, Christoph A.
    Becker, Anton
    Seifert, Burkhard
    Reiner, Caecilia S.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (09) : 1145 - 1153
  • [3] Increased interreader agreement in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using an adapted LI-RADS algorithm
    Becker, Anton S.
    Barth, Borna K.
    Marquez, Paulo H.
    Donati, Olivio F.
    Ulbrich, Erika J.
    Karlo, Christoph
    Reiner, Caecilia S.
    Fischer, Michael A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 86 : 33 - 40
  • [4] Assessing Radiology Research on Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Guide for Authors, Reviewers, and Readers-From the Radiology Editorial Board
    Bluemke, David A.
    Moy, Linda
    Bredella, Miriam A.
    Ertl-Wagner, Birgit B.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Goh, Vicky J.
    Halpern, Elkan F.
    Hess, Christopher P.
    Schiebler, Mark L.
    Weiss, Clifford R.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2020, 294 (03) : 487 - 489
  • [5] Focal liver masses: Enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images - Concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images
    Burns, Peter N.
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 242 (01) : 162 - 174
  • [6] Assessing tumor response after loco-regional liver cancer therapies: the role of 3D MRI
    Chapiro, Julius
    Lin, MingDe
    Duran, Rafael
    Schernthaner, Ruediger E.
    Geschwind, Jean-Francois
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2015, 15 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [7] Radiologic-Pathologic Analysis of Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Patients with HCC after TACE: Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D Quantitative Image Analysis
    Chapiro, Julius
    Wood, Laura D.
    Lin, MingDe
    Duran, Rafael
    Cornish, Toby
    Lesag, David
    Charu, Vivek
    Schernthaner, Ruediger
    Wang, Zhijun
    Tacher, Vania
    Savic, Lynn Jeanette
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Geschwind, Jean-Francois
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 273 (03) : 746 - 758
  • [8] Danila M, 2010, MED ULTRASON, V12, P233
  • [9] Three-dimensional solid texture analysis in biomedical imaging: Review and opportunities
    Depeursinge, Adrien
    Foncubierta-Rodriguez, Antonio
    De Ville, Dimitri Van
    Mueller, Henning
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2014, 18 (01) : 176 - 196
  • [10] Liver MRI: From basic protocol to advanced techniques
    Donato, Henrique
    Franca, Manuela
    Candelaria, Isabel
    Caseiro-Alves, Filipe
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 93 : 30 - 39